Donald Trump‘s inner circle doesn’t expect the Supreme Court to go along with his extreme arguments about executive power in the immunity case before the justices. But what the high court does now is almost beside the point: Trump already won.

Three people with direct knowledge of the matter tell Rolling Stone that many of the former president’s lawyers and political advisers have already accepted that the justices will likely rule against him, and reject his claims to expansive presidential immunity in perpetuity. Bringing the case before the court — after a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., shut down their arguments on executive power — was a delaying tactic designed to push Trump’s criminal election subversion trial past Election Day this fall. The strategy paid off so much more than MAGAworld anticipated.

“We already pulled off the heist,” says a source close to Trump, noting it doesn’t matter to them what the Supreme Court decides now.

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    181
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    And lawyers wonder why so many people hate them.

    What a fucking disaster. :(

    • ALQ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      167
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      We know why we’re hated; it’s why those of us who strive to exemplify professionalism, ethics, and civility are so angry and depressed. It’s why I’ve been having a career crisis because I always wanted to go into law, but only to do good, and now it feels like there is so little legitimacy to the judicial branch.

      Fuck the people who abuse the rule of law until there is none, fuck Trump and his cronies, and fuck SCOTUS for fucking us. Now excuse me, I have to go cry in a corner.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        6 months ago

        You can always bail. I did. That JD is wildly useful in other industries. Over a third of the people I’m still in contact with from my graduating class aren’t actively practicing anymore.

        • Cringedrif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          6 months ago

          And that’s the end game for the shit bags that abuse the system. They don’t want a legitimate judicial system. It’s now about how can they gain the most money and power.

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Lawyers need a Hippocratic Oath to do no harm (and hold errant lawyers accountable for malpractice) before the public will trust a lawyer.

        • Xhieron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          6 months ago

          We (lawyers) are actually already ethically obligated to serve up bad lawyers for discipline. It’s Rule 8.3, colloquially known as the duty to rat out your colleagues.

        • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          How would that even work? Do murderers not get an attorney any longer? Who’s harm should we consider? I have to represent my clients’ interests, period.

          The issue with the law is the delay. If I take a civil case to trial it has usually taken 3-5 years. And five years isn’t nearly the longest case I’ve had. Spend more money, have more judges, fewer delays, but that costs money and we’ve been cutting taxes for 40+ years now.

        • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Don’t know if you know this but Hippocratic oath is a) voluntary and b) not enforceable for people who work in medicine. Also the Hippocratic oath came from medics treating enemy soldiers on battlefields. The idea being that a medical professional wouldn’t refuse to treat someone because the patient they’re treating clashes with their personal beliefs. Modern example being a Christian nurse or Dr refusing to treat a gay patient.

          • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Well you literally can’t enforce it. Take surgery, for example. In surgery, you must first do some harm so that you can do significantly more good.

      • interrobang@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        6 months ago

        I appreciate you. I had a good lawyer take up my wrongful termination case, back when i was idealistic.

        He knew i was right, but on paper they skirted the law. He put in the work to get me unemployment & keep me housed, and he never even billed me.

        Thank you for trying. I know its hard.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        I knew a guy who wanted to be a lawyer for the same reasons. Got his degree and passed the bar, then quit and went back to school for biomed. He said he loved law itself, but realized he hated pretty much every coworker and every client, and he knew if he stayed in it he’d become a person he hated as well.

        • ALQ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m fortunate enough to be practicing in a field that does help people (though not nearly as much as I’d like…someone give me Elon’s money and then I’ll be able to make a real difference). The problem is that lawyers/judges like the ones who are handling cases like Trump’s are destroying the rule of law, the efficacy of the courts, and doing whatever they can to dismantle the very system we use to determine whether we have rights or not (dismantle it and the answer is a very clear “not”). The US legal system is already a clusterfuck with not enough budget and inequitable treatment depending on who you are; if things like precedent no longer mean anything, as SCOTUS has recently started making clear, then the legal system becomes completely unnavigable.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    6 months ago

    Election Day doesn’t stop or delay anything when the politician is already indicted.

  • nkat2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yes, and the celebration over a court delay for this team expecting judicial loss - a familiar occurrence for them - will have been worthwhile…

    … strictly provided that Don Snorleone wins in November.

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    If there’s any point at which leftists start seriously popping off, it’s either soon or never

    • Truth_Hurts@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, if Trump tries to become dictator I’ll die defending democracy and I’ll take a lot of traitors with me if I can.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        They’re advocating for violence but specifically not endorsing it because they aren’t going to do shit.

        • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Same with the people who are quick to jump in and say that they’ll take traitors out. If you’ve a family or kids there’s no way you’re fucking risking your life and leaving your family to mourn by playing wannabe freedom fighter. And those that don’t have a family and live in a basement would be too much of a pussy to actually go face to face with a mob or a military or a pseudo military like the cops.

      • LostWon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        You could check Urban Dictionary online, but as I understand it, pop off usually means to say or do something to great effect (such as effectively speaking truth to power). Doesn’t have to only be about speech or putting someone in their place, but it often is.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      All those fucking “we need to burn the whole system down instead of voting” bastards being REAL QUIET right now

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        If they even think for a second about trying to organize any kind of violent crime they’ll have FBI informants and surveillance all over their lives faster than they can say January 6th

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          FBI has been working to disrupt leftist organizing since the 50’s and earlier. If they had been putting that amount of effort into RW projects, there would be none.

          Also, to whatever extent, FBI doesn’t need to disrupt leftists. They do that perfectly fine on their own.

  • galoisghost@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    Until the Supreme Court actually sides with his arguments.

    If that does happen Biden should just have him jailed and removed from every ballot in the country, then unilaterally impeach every member of the Supreme Court who assented. Biden’s the president he can do what he wants, he has immunity

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Even if they can’t try him by election day, I hope they still convict and imprison him even if he’s in office. The presidency is not blanket immunity.

    Honestly, courts can move quickly if they want. I say try him quickly (after all, he has the right to a speedy trial) and let him appeal from prison, like anyone else would have to. No special treatment.

    Furthermore, I hope everyone making these appears in bad also receives some kind of consequence.