i quite literally said that i would consider it a violation of privacy,

That is what you said.

What you would consider it is irrelevant to what people who have experienced it have considered it.

So you acknowledge that I would, in fact, expose my child naked in public. And with good reason. And everyone could see her genitalia when I did.

But what I am arguing is that is an anthropocentric view of what constitutes pain and suffering. We cannot assume either is not possible without a nervous system. It’s worth at least looking into the concept even though we don’t know that there would be a mechanism simply based on what we know about plants so far. I myself would put myself on the no side when it comes to whether or not plants feel pain, but I couldn’t say that it was a 100% definite no by any means and I think we may feel very differently about what it means to be a plant and what plants are capable of in 20 years.

That is what we were going for!

And this is how I find out that the closest place name to that word is “Cunta” in Indonesia.

Lame.

However, the road the brothels were on in English towns were apparently known as “Gropecunt Lane,” so I learned that today.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gropecunt_Lane

Ah well, there will always be Dildo, Canada.

You claiming that it would give you PTSD is not evidence that anyone has suffered or is suffering from PTSD because of it. That’s just you making an assumption about a situation you’ve apparently never actually faced.

You wouldn’t expose your child naked in public,

How exactly do you think someone changes a diaper at a park?

What you got from my post and what I actually said have already been established to be very distant from one another.

And, again, I am not the one trying to debate anything here despite you accusing me of it.

I’d say that really depends on context. Nudity at a beach? Sure. But I also think that there should be clothed-only areas as an option as well. Give everyone what they want. This is obviously not the way to do it since that was how it already was.

I’m certainly not suggesting people get arrested for child abuse or anything.

It’s really sad how you’re trusting an AI to get anything accurate after the fucking glue on pizza thing.

They mean Frank Pallone. That’s the one Democrat. He’s in New Jersey and they’re based in Atlanta.

So I sure would like to know why they are donating to Frank Pallone as the one Democrat they donate to.

I wasn’t trying to make up any sort of debate. You are the one trying to debate here. And you’re not doing it very well either.

Toddlers imitate everything adults do and I don’t think that’s something toddlers should be doing, nor something that people on a beach should see toddlers doing.

Very interesting points, and this was the sort of discussion I was hoping to have. These are complex ethical questions without simple answers and in 100 years, people may look back at any eating choices made in this time, be they vegan or 100% carnivore, to be absolutely nuts because none of us have figured out that the real key to good and ethical nutrition is everyone eats a soup made from cloned moose DNA and petroleum. Science is constantly changing and moving on, so who knows? But it’s an interesting thing to talk about, at least to me.

For now, I am on the side of those who say it is not ethical to eat meats, but it is ethical to eat plants. In 20 years of plant science? Who can say?

They donated to one Democrat. The other thing that is listed as blue is an organization that wants more queer politicians of any political stripe in the United States. But I suppose anything that promotes queer people as human and needing representation is just part of the “woke mind virus,” so you’ve convinced me. Cox is 100% communist.

You still seem to think I’m justifying eating meat when I still don’t eat meat.

Fallacy

A (potentially) thinking or feeling plant has to be killed in order to eat it just like an animal has to be killed, and there’s no difference between the two.

Did you not read what I wrote? I made it very clear that there were a lot of differences.

And the fun part is that you’re the second person to tell me that I was trying to justify eating meat when, again, the first four words of my post are “I don’t eat meat.” I couldn’t have been more clear on that point.

Cool, link to where you got it from.

Again, can you find this concept used in some context outside of this conversation?

If I masturbate to Michelangelo’s David, does that make Michelangelo’s David pornographic?

Only if by “liberal” you mean what it means everywhere else in the U.S.

And you might as well link to Media Bias Fact Check if you’re going to paste from it. Which would be the company that’s become very pro-Israel as of late. Not exactly a position for “liberals” in America, as your sort likes to call everyone to the left of Trump.