• diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      After Germany declared war on them? They didn’t defeat them out of good will, in fact, I’d say America and South Africa were the closest things to Nazi Germany outside of the Reich

      • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not really, no. And let’s ignore the part where the only reason they even fought is because Russia wanted to conquer some of the same land as Germany 😂

        • Nudding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          It was a combined effort, but Russia did most of the work and lost most of the lives? Nice

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            The Russians did nothing on the Western Front or North Africa.

            But yes, they lost the most lives. I’m not sure why that means it wasn’t a collaborative effort. Are you claiming that if the U.S. and Britain had sat by and done nothing, Russia would have defeated Hitler singlehandedly and liberated Western Europe? Because I find that to be a very spurious claim if so.

          • FireTower@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Suffering more losses does equate to contributing more to towards the victory. For example America’s Lend Lease Act didn’t cost American soldiers but contributed towards the allied victory.