The scenes were emblematic of the crisis gripping the small, Oregon mountain town of Grants Pass, where a fierce fight over park space has become a battleground for a much larger, national debate on homelessness that has reached the U.S. Supreme Court.
The town’s case, set to be heard April 22, has broad implications for how not only Grants Pass, but communities nationwide address homelessness, including whether they can fine or jail people for camping in public. It has made the town of 40,000 the unlikely face of the nation’s homelessness crisis, and further fueled the debate over how to deal with it.
“I certainly wish this wasn’t what my town was known for,” Mayor Sara Bristol told The Associated Press last month. “It’s not the reason why I became mayor. And yet it has dominated every single thing that I’ve done for the last 3 1/2 years.”
Officials across the political spectrum — from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom in California, which has nearly 30% of the nation’s homeless population, to a group of 22 conservative-led states — have filed briefs in the case, saying lower court rulings have hamstrung their ability to deal with encampments.
Removed by mod
“Just stop being poor!” - that town
Just reach into your wallet and pull out the money is not rocket science
More likely, “go be poor somewhere else!”
I mean, for real. How long before the cattle cars come?
Guy at my old work was always saying we need to do this.
Plans like that always work until the metaphorical cattle car comes for them.
I genuinely believe these places should just give homeless people 1-way tickets to Hawaii.
Make it their problem.
Personally, if I was homeless and found out I’m now in debt from the greedy-fuckers who put me there…
I would just take the law into my own hands at that point.
Removed by mod
Regardless of how they hit there, how is it useful for anyone to attempt to fine someone for having nothing? Seems like just a pretense to jail people
There is political pressure from our corporate prison companies to fill their beds, so they can get their tasty government stipend. Indeed, jailing them is beneficial to both parties involved as it “solves” the homeless issue for the govt and makes money for the
briberydonation class citizens they serve.Removed by mod
Often, at the surface all you’ll see is someone being homeless through their own actions. Take a peak a little closer and you’ll see that we all failed them collectively. The biggest difference I’ve noticed between housed and unhoused isn’t the amount of trauma/violence/abuse they’ve suffered its the amount of support around them that made the difference in life trajectory.
Removed by mod
By their own fault? Do they just super enjoy living outside?
Removed by mod