The investigation is tied to an incident on an Alaska Airlines flight in early January. Boeing also told a Senate panel that it cannot find a record of the work done on the Alaska plane.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    8 months ago

    If it’s anything like other criminal inquiries in this country, they will find the lowest paid chump on the totem pole to pin all the blame on while the C-Suite once again walks away with Golden god damned Parachutes.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s optimistic to assume they’ll even bother finding someone in the company guilty even if it’s some low level chump. I don’t actually expect anyone to be found guilty in this whole thing. The only time corporations in this country actually suffer repercussions for their actions is when they cost shareholders significant money Enron style.

      • Talaraine@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is absolutely right. The worst case scenario in these situations is a settlement with no admission of fault.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think even this isn’t as hurtful to major shareholders - the ones that have decisionmaking power - as you’d hope. They typically have more information and pay more attention than the small fish. They’d offload their shares earlier, for longer, as to not disturb the price too much, leaving the remainder to hold the bag once shit hits the fan. The stock market enables that. They’ve extracted a shit ton of money by steering the company over the last couple of decades. The ones that would really bear the brunt are the shareholders that never had any decisionmaking power, and the company’s workers.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Oh I’m sure their Legal team will get QA people to do a full audit trail to find out who was on shift at the assembly line and blame them.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 months ago

      How else will their stock price go up amidst all this controversy lol.

      Accountability should be held at the top. If they can benefit from cost cutting that can potentially kill people through negligence, they need to face criminal consequences for doing so.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not potentially.

        MCAS did kill several hundred people just a few years ago.

        A system Boeing put in place and snuck past regulators specifically to deploy a cheaply developed product that could compete with airbus.

        The executives at Boeing already have blood on their hands. They should have faced manslaughter charges for the 2 flights that went down due to MCAS.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        No no no, this is all a 5D Chess move:

        Make shit planes, stock falls like the planes

        Buyback stocks, price rises

        repeat

        WAKE UP, SHEEPLANE!!!1

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Sadly nothing Boeing has done is criminal in the US even though it absolutely should be. It’s just the bog standard corporate pursuit of profit at the expense of all else. Cutting corners, ignoring safety, rushing everything, and all with fewer people to do the work than are necessary. If Boeing is found criminally guilty for that half the corporations in the US are in trouble.

    No, this is just political theater, much like the TSA is. Boeing has fucked up enough that people are starting to take notice, so this is just a little reminder to them that they need to stop fucking up quite so publicly. The executives will sweat a little, temporarily improve things, and then go right back to their usual bullshit in a year or two when things calm down. Worst case scenario they’ll put out a series of BP style “We’re sorry” videos where they emphasize how much quality and safety supposedly mean to them.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      much like the TSA is

      While mostly true, the TSA was also a stealth jobs program for flunkies who couldn’t get jobs anywhere else (and to help Bush pump his jobs numbers, which were abysmal). You kind of have to be a motivated fucking idiot to spend every day undermining the fourth amendment and acting like you’re doing a service to society. Especially with all the evidence of TSA agents using their authority to just outright steal shit. They’re not hiring the best, and everyone knows that they hire the worst of the worst for these jobs, so it’s hard to even call it “theater” anymore when everyone sees right through it. Hypernormalization.

      • quicksand@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        While you’re correct in your assessment, I’d like to remind people to not be assholes to TSA when they’re going through security. They’re people just trying to do their jobs like the rest of us. It’s a shit job with no recognition and a ton of public contact. The agents aren’t there because they want to stomp on your rights; they have bills to pay and people to take care of.

        • Որբունի@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Being assholes to them is irrational, they can be more of a nuisance to you than you can be to them. However I disagree people doing those jobs deserve any respect, doing evil because it’s a job and it pays and they can’t think of anything better… that doesn’t mean it suddenly becomes acceptable. The pawns don’t feel like they’re responsible for abuses.

    • AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sadly nothing Boeing has done is criminal in the US even though it absolutely should be.

      I doubt that you know whether Boeing has or has not broken any laws.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        OK, well nothing there’s anything public about anyway. It’s always possible they’ve been embezzling or I don’t know, running a drug smuggling ring out of their warehouses, but nothing they’ve probably done is illegal. Remember this is all just a response to the multiple accidents related to manufacturing defects in their planes. At this moment the worst charge they’re looking at is maybe criminal negligence.

        • meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Cover up is where I’d put money. Supplying a federal agency with falsified documents or otherwise lying would start getting into criminal territory. Though I agree that we, the public, have no evidence of that.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          They’re being investigated under “Conspiracy to Defraud the United States”, which does have criminal penalties.

          Now, that’s a prison sentence of up to 5 years. People died because of the decisions by Boeing executives, and countless others were put at risk. There should be a whole lot more here that they should be charged with, but probably won’t.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            And when was the last time that the US sent to jail anybody in the C-suite of a major US company?

            In the US (and not only) the Law might be on the book but it’s most definitelly selectivelly applied and all we’ve seen when it comes to the top people in such “too big to fail” companies is settlements with no admission of guilt.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I don’t disagree. I also think people should present the VW Diesel Emissions scandal accurately.

              • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Oh yeah, that stuff was a complete total disgrace and partly why I wrote “In the US (and not only)”.

                Protecting C-suite types in big companies is almost always how things work in Western Nations, even the supposedly more honest ones.

    • Malek061@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      An enterprising DA should charge a corporation with murder under the personhood standard established by citizens united and go for the death penalty . Revoke their ability to exist in the state.

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      If someone bought off that the bolts were reinstalled they can get in trouble for falsifying inspection records.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Somehow I doubt American Ju$tice will jail the executive who went laughing all the way to bank with the bonuses they made from cutting corners in design, manufacturing and QA, cutting costs down to the bone and using Boeing employees acting as in-house FAA “representatives” to self-certify the pieces of junk Boeing now makes.

    (As somebody else pointed out, the deaths attributable to such practices, namelly in the MCAS debacle, should’ve been treated as manslaughter).

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Its a functional state-financed monopoly that isn’t owned or operated by the state and gets to charge taxpayers an absurd markup per unit by passing every expenditure through half a dozen shell companies that each get to squeeze out profit on the margins.

      But hey, we get the latest in aviation technology, right? Not like they’re just churning out lemons that fall apart in midair.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not even. They knew MCAS was unrecoverable. Their test pilots told them this and the government has the documents. They released it anyway and lied about it. That’s not, “oops”, that’s malice and forethought.

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m making four flights soon with the Boeing 737 Max 8. I’m sure the software is probably all updated and debugged properly.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Rosie the riveter is getting old and can’t keep up with the assembly speed…

    2 years jail for Rocie for riveting slowly

    2 weeks community service for the CEO who required managers to push Rocie faster

    I’m a manager, so I’m pretty sure we’re blameless lol.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nah, the door blowing off the airplane was world news. The 2 Boeing crashes a handful of years ago were world news. It’s a massive American company. The writing has been on the wall for a while.

      • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It is a long going story, but this extra concern happens right after their report and their reports get a lot of views.

    • CuttingBoard@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      There was a documentary about Boeing that was very detailed and it was largely ignored. Oliver’s platform helped get the problem the attention it deserved.

      • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        The truly rich shareholder billionaires that could affect the price, not the measly millionaires, have their own chartered personal business jets. 20 mil can get you a starter jet that runs well, say 1m/year for pilot, copilot, and crew to be on call 24/7. Fuel expenses and runway time, all in all its cheap for them. The ones that want a brand new jet are spending a 60-100mm.

        No billionaire cares more about their non-existant demon tube travel than the profits. If they’re selling or shorting Boeing shares, it’s because of the public outrage, not their own fear of personal safety.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I suspect the explosive decompression caused by one of the doors flying off a plane mid-air might have been more directly responsible than the rapidly downsizing streaming service comedy show that decided to make a few jokes about it.

  • Smeagol666@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The only reason they’re pretending to give a shit is because the stock prices are dropping. The whole time I guess we’ll just ignore the whistleblower that just got “Epsteined” right in the middle of depositions about these self same quality issues. Maybe they’ll even try to blame the dead guy since he was a quality manager, can’t get any more convenient than that.