• silverbax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Any company that thinks remote work isn’t the future is going to suffer dramatically over the next decade unless they adapt.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      My company has an interesting strategy. We’re mainly hiring people local to our office (closed the others), but no one is required to go in. Hell, I’ve been told a few times, “You ordered $thing and no one was there to receive it. Can you check from now on?”

      This way, if we want to pull a team together for a minute, we can. Most folks know each other, if even from a brief visit, and that works out better. Lemmy bags on in-person relationships, psychology be damned. 🤷🏻‍♂️

      But if we ever mandated a return to the office? LOL no. Our top talent would walk and we’d be left with the dregs who can’t find a better job.

      • Prox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        Our top talent would walk and we’d be left with the dregs who can’t find a better job.

        Yuuuuuuup. This is exactly what’s happening at my job right now, after they mandated at least three in-office days per week. Only the top people are leaving, too; the chaff and the bums love it, because they no longer have to produce, rather they just have to be seen.

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      I just started a gig at a company that doesn’t really know how to do remote work well, but that basically told me that they were having trouble finding candidates so they had to start looking for remote.

      I recently left a gig that sold their offices off so even employees in the area don’t have an office to go to anymore and everyone is remote. They’ve lost some Product/Manager people over the decision, but have otherwise seen an uptick in productivity and morale.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I just recently got laid off, and the industry I work in doesn’t have a huge presence in my city so I was pretty bummed. I was expecting a long, difficult hunt for a new job (I have zero interest in moving).

        But boom, first job I applied for, I got. It’s located in the next province over, but it’s full remote. Cost of living is way cheaper here so I got a big raise and my new employers are probably still chuckling about how cheap I am. A win for everyone.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Fuck the realestate industry period. It shouldn’t be commodified to the point where there are more empty houses up for rent, airbnb, or sitting empty as “investments” than there are homeless. Foreign companies are allowed to buy up realestate and literally extract wealth from the country for something that’s supposed to ultimately be owned by the country (hence no escaping property taxes or eminate domain)… It’s such a limitedly regulated mess that any such “free market” cannot responsibly control.

      • LemmyLinks@lemmy.worldB
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        We need to have way more empty housing than homeless. We can literally build as much housing as we choose. The current high price is literally what our society has decided the price is based on limiting supply.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is great! Only the rich suffer!

      They surely won’t find other ways to make up this loss of wealth. And they surely won’t take it out of our hides.

      Trickledown economics only flows up.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      The hard part will be water lines for so much active water use. A sink and a few toilets is one thing but rigging an irrigation system that also has drainage for leaks or overflows requires space and lots of upfront renovation costs that will be paid back over a very long time. It’s a difficult financial proposition.

      • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’re not running showers out whatever that needs fresh water and the goal would be to reuse that water over and over. You only need to get the water in there to begin with, then your pumps will move it around.

        • unoriginalsin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          Afaraf
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          The problem is a constant fight against gravity. You’ve still got to pump the water effectively to the top of the building every day. And there’s still the issue of getting sunlight to the plants.

          The question really becomes whether it’s more economical to just use traditional irrigation techniques upstream and ship the produce in vs converting a skyscraper into a very inefficient farm space.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Vertical farming usually uses LED lighting, not direct sunlight. And I think the idea is that once the water is present on a given level it gets recirculated and reprocessed there, so it wouldn’t need much additional pumping.

    • LemmyLinks@lemmy.worldB
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why would we want some of the most productive land in the city to be used on farming that can be done somewhere else on land that isn’t even close to as productive?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Love the idea, but how much CO2 you willing to put into that project? It’s gonna cost. Big time.

      Ever built or installed anything? It costs far more energy to retrofit than to burn it down and start fresh.

  • Nora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 months ago

    Holy fuck! Wins are rare, but they are nice to see.

    Here’s hoping this is the start of a trend. Next step retrofitting.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Unfortunately, these days, that usually means, “we’re willing to risk as many of our employees as we can.”