• ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      The hard part will be water lines for so much active water use. A sink and a few toilets is one thing but rigging an irrigation system that also has drainage for leaks or overflows requires space and lots of upfront renovation costs that will be paid back over a very long time. It’s a difficult financial proposition.

      • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re not running showers out whatever that needs fresh water and the goal would be to reuse that water over and over. You only need to get the water in there to begin with, then your pumps will move it around.

        • unoriginalsin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          Afaraf
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          The problem is a constant fight against gravity. You’ve still got to pump the water effectively to the top of the building every day. And there’s still the issue of getting sunlight to the plants.

          The question really becomes whether it’s more economical to just use traditional irrigation techniques upstream and ship the produce in vs converting a skyscraper into a very inefficient farm space.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Vertical farming usually uses LED lighting, not direct sunlight. And I think the idea is that once the water is present on a given level it gets recirculated and reprocessed there, so it wouldn’t need much additional pumping.

    • LemmyLinks@lemmy.worldB
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why would we want some of the most productive land in the city to be used on farming that can be done somewhere else on land that isn’t even close to as productive?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Love the idea, but how much CO2 you willing to put into that project? It’s gonna cost. Big time.

      Ever built or installed anything? It costs far more energy to retrofit than to burn it down and start fresh.