• LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      The last bit you quoted about Biden is referring to statements he made about Biden asking Netanyahu about the possibility of a ceasefire and that Bibi told Biden there is none.

        • Fal@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes, there’s no possibility because he’s asked and was tolled no possibility.

          • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            This is the correct answer. There will be no cease fire until, at minimum, the hostages are released. The other problem that the Israelis have is that there’s no evidence that Hamas has any intention of honoring a cease fire as they’ve willingly violated many such agreements in the past.

            I don’t have a strong opinion as to what the correct choice is here for Israel, I’m simply stating the facts as they relate to the possibility of a cease fire.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      why tf is a state legislature even wasting time on this?

      they should be contacting their elected representatives in congress like anyone else.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Only ones picking up the phones I imagine. You should attend a local school board meeting and listen to all the

        “This is state level policy”

        “I don’t care do something about it!”

        People are raising their concerns with the powers that be and they aren’t listening so they go find someone with some power and yell at them.

        And yeah this is not me showing contempt. I get it fully.

      • Unaware7013@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        If he wasn’t, he’s be called an antisemitic jew hater for daring question the Israeli narrative. Anything less than full throated support is akin to supporting Hamas according to a very large amount of stupid and/or intellectually dishonest people.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          You aren’t wrong, but he’s been ride-or-die for Israel for his entire career. He’s the most pro-Israel president we’ve ever had.

          • girlfreddy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Reagan was seriously pro-Israel and started the whole US-supported Israeli military funding. source

            Jen Kirby - You mentioned that the United States had a big investment in the Iron Dome. Why is that — what’s the US’s stake in this?

            Jean-Loup Samaan - Well, first, historically, the US started cooperating with Israel on air defense in the 1980s. So when missile defense became a significant component of defense investment in the US, Israel was very quickly involved. There’s a history of close ties between both countries in that field. So it would seem, in a sense, natural that a consequence of that is to support something like Iron Dome.

            I think it was around the end of Obama’s first term, in 2012, that the US put a stronger emphasis on Iron Dome in terms of budgeting. I believe it was probably not just the politics behind it, but also the strategic assessment that the priority is to protect and to strengthen the defense of Israel vis-à-vis these types of rockets.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              What do you think would happen to Israel if Biden came out and said “we will no longer defend Israel, everybody go nuts”?

              Lebanon and Iran and Qatar and Yemen and Iraq and Afghanistan and Turkey and Egypt and maybe even Russia would obliterate them. Israel is only able to exist because the US gives it unconditional support. Hence, the 51st state - an attack on Israel is an attack on the US.

              • SirVer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Lebanon and Iran and Qatar and Yemen and Iraq and Afghanistan and Turkey and Egypt and maybe even Russia would obliterate them.

                I have serious doubts as to the ability of some of these countries to be able to match up to Israel militarily, even aside from having other things to worry about at the moment - Russia in particular does not have the privilege of fighting two wars right now.

                There’s also the fact that Israel is a nuclear power - they almost used their nukes in the Yom Kippur war, which is what prompted the US to actually start resupplying them. If an Arab coalition were to attack Israel now (especially with Netanyahu in power), there is zero chance that they wouldn’t actually do it this time, and everyone knows this. No one in their right mind would try and pressure Israel to that extent, and most foreign powers would be highly motivated to do whatever it took to make sure that didn’t happen.

                Finally, if the US were to leave Israel alone, China would probably step right in to fill that void, and would be well-suited for it too, given that they have relatively good relations with most of the Arab nations (IIRC). So not only would the US lose a massive channel of influence in the region, they’d be allowing their largest geopolitical rival to consolidate their influence in the region as well - wouldn’t Biden be absolutely raked over the coals for that?

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    It’s still clearly an option. You’d think an ancient men would care more about stopping genocide than his own career…

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  wouldn’t Biden be absolutely raked over the coals for that?

                  Ignoring all your speculation about Israel’s strength (I’m highly skeptical they could actually survive modern warfare - they have drone pilots, not infantry lol) he absolutely would. There’s a huge portion of the electorate that absolutely loves Israel and supports their genocide.

                  That’s not really a good reason to continue supporting them.