Lyft is introducing a new feature that lets women and non-binary riders choose a preference to match with drivers of the same gender.

The ride-hailing company said it was a “highly requested feature” in a blog post Tuesday, saying the new feature allows women and non-binary people to “feel that much more confident” in using Lyft and also hopefully encourage more women to sign up to be drivers to access its “flexible earning opportunities.”

The service, called “Women+ Connect,” is rolling out in the coming months. Riders can turn on the option in the Lyft app, however the company warns that it’s not a guarantee that they’ll be matched with a women or non-binary person if one of those people aren’t nearby. Both the riders and drivers will need to opt-in to the feature for it work and riders must chose a gender for it to work.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not equal if it gives special treatment to one but not both. Why can’t I request a specific driver as a man. What if I don’t feel safe with a woman driver based on stereotypes like the woman and trans passengers are. If they assume the male driver is going to make comments or passes at them then I as a male passenger should be able to assume the woman driver might be bad and get me in an accident.

      • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Women and non-binary people gain more safety from this. What are men going to gain from a feature letting them have only male drivers?

        It’s such an incredible dumb thing to be mad about.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Arguably where is the harm in making it allowable to all for it to be equal?

          Arguably, men can gain more safety too, or are you claiming the same can’t happen to men?

          What an incredibly narrow sighted view point.

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Do you not think traumatized men might not? Me personally no, there’s also women who don’t fear for their life around men.

                  So… what’s your point? It applies to both sexes as I hopefully just helped you with.

                  Or of you the group that think the same can’t apply to men?

                  • SeducingCamel@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There’s a big difference in the amount of traumatized men and the systemic oppression of women. Have you ever thought that maybe everything isn’t about you? Do you actually listen to women when they talk to you or do you just go “but but men this men that!”

                • transigence@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Fearing for your safety from relational aggression from women is completely rational. Women are just as aggressive as men — it just takes a different form.

            • Soulg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The exact same way women and nb people get more safety. You’re not that special. It goes both ways, the rate may be much higher one way, but it exists the other way too.

    • transigence@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What “playing field” are you talking about, what is unequal, and what does this do to supposedly equalize this… playing field?

      • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Violent attacks like sexual assault are disproportionately done my male drivers upon non-male passengers. Why do you not see how this is unequal?

        • transigence@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess I just have a problem with your phrasing. You make it sound like if we worked to increase the number of sexual assaults that happen to men by women, this would be a solution to the problem.

          A “playing field” is an analogy for a field of opportunities, like the job market or access to services like education.

          • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You make it sound like if we worked to increase the number of sexual assaults that happen to men by women, this would be a solution to the problem.

            What?