The Oregon case decided Friday is the most significant to come before the high court in decades on the issue and comes as a rising number of people in the U.S. are without a permanent place to live.

The Oregon case decided Friday is the most significant to come before the high court in decades on the issue and comes as a rising number of people in the U.S. are without a permanent place to live.

  • homura1650@lemm.ee
    21·
    4 days ago

    The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.

    Overall, the dissent is good. But it makes 1 fundamental mistake of constitutional analysis:

    The Constitution cannot be evaded by such formalistic distinctions