A. You don’t know how medians work. In a set of [1,1,1,1,5,8,9,9,9] 5 is the median. But you wouldn’t say that’s representative of the average worker. You’re looking for the mode. Which would be 1 in that data set.
B. .8 percent is not the hot news you’re looking for.
I did read my sources, because when I said we beat inflation, that’s what my source says
Good news, we had more than a decade of growing wages (the COVID spike is due to compositional effects)
A. You don’t know how medians work. In a set of [1,1,1,1,5,8,9,9,9] 5 is the median. But you wouldn’t say that’s representative of the average worker. You’re looking for the mode. Which would be 1 in that data set.
B. .8 percent is not the hot news you’re looking for.
5 is more representative than the mode, since it does show that about half make more and half made less
1 is ignoring the rest of the data completely
If this was a representative sample the ones would have rebelled already. This is a teaching example.
Not really, if the 1 is $100,000, should they feel worse than the $500,000 and above?
The 1 is not 100,000 and you know it.
Yes, but my point is not everyone should be equal, everyone should have enough money to live
Those are very different goals