No, they didn’t. The point that were made all stated that everything’s protected by free speech. No one here is upset about the Black National Anthem being sung, you’re just trying to stir up shit. Ergo, DON’T MAKE IT A THING.
Dog they just listed reasons they think the maga reaction is stupid and you’ve got a whole write up as to why maga doesn’t care about legality. You missed the plot it’s okay.
We know that though. We know they only care because they’re racist. The commenter doesn’t care if it’s a legal issue or not. They just think it’s stupid and listed 6 reasons they think that. Move on it ain’t that deep.
Calling someone “delusional” isn’t a figure of speech; that adjective isn’t used figuratively, as a simile, or as a metaphor. It’s used in this context as a direct accusation, and its literal meaning is already implied.
deleted by creator
All of those six statements were predicated with “This is such a non-thing that it hurts to even consider how stupid it is.“
Ergo, let’s not make it a thing…
deleted by creator
No, they didn’t. The point that were made all stated that everything’s protected by free speech. No one here is upset about the Black National Anthem being sung, you’re just trying to stir up shit. Ergo, DON’T MAKE IT A THING.
deleted by creator
Oh look, someone trying to stir up a dumb argument on the internet because they need attention.
deleted by creator
ooh look, another strawman argument. strawman arguments all over the place today!
deleted by creator
You don’t know what a straw man argument is do you?
deleted by creator
You missed statement 0.
deleted by creator
Oh okay so you chose to ignore it and draw your own conclusions at what point they were making, got it.
deleted by creator
Dog they just listed reasons they think the maga reaction is stupid and you’ve got a whole write up as to why maga doesn’t care about legality. You missed the plot it’s okay.
deleted by creator
We know that though. We know they only care because they’re racist. The commenter doesn’t care if it’s a legal issue or not. They just think it’s stupid and listed 6 reasons they think that. Move on it ain’t that deep.
deleted by creator
In this context “that’s protected speech” means roughly, “STFU maga, nothing you can do about it, and you have no basis for your tantum.”
You don’t need the “literally”. You can just say delusional.
deleted by creator
No, you didn’t and don’t.
Calling someone “delusional” isn’t a figure of speech; that adjective isn’t used figuratively, as a simile, or as a metaphor. It’s used in this context as a direct accusation, and its literal meaning is already implied.
deleted by creator
Perhaps it is used figuratively frequently.
You still didn’t need the word “literally”; the literal meaning of “delusional” is implied in your accusation already.
deleted by creator
Yes, it is.
this pedantic bullshit isn’t worth your time. don’t let them distract you from important work.
Pedantry isn’t important!?