• bedrooms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    As a non-US citizen I’d like to reiterate that you can get rid of this idiocy only by banning guns.

    Not interested in American opinion regrading this one, sorry, it’s a super simple fact with no discussion worth wasting time for us.

    • osarusan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not interested in American opinion regrading this one

      Kind of shitty to assume that all Americans have the same opinion, no?

    • Kata1yst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Statistically, most Americans agree with much stronger gun controls. Even a significant portion of the conservative block. It’s the few holding the rest of us ransom.

      • Forester@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That would be because there are many people who have no idea about firearms trying to legislate firearms. When the laws are written and constructed in such a way that it makes it so that the commoner is a criminal then the law is not viable. Stop sticking ridiculous riders on your bills and legislation.

        • iegod@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I would rather live somewhere that bans guns by people who know nothing about guns than live somewhere where they aren’t banned but still regulated by people who still know nothing.

    • D_C@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I, from the UK, once had a ‘conversation’ about gun control with an American on Reddit. What brought this about was the day before a 9 year old girl was killed by a stray bullet from a drive-by. One moment she was in her bedroom doing some homework, and the next she was dead.

      After a lot of back and forth with him getting more flummoxed and aggressive he then said something like “If she was outside playing like a normal kid then she wouldn’t have been killed.”
      Yep, he blamed her.

      That was the time I realised it was a waste of everything talking about it.

    • Gljvf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or the mother could.have practiced proper gun safety.

      The kid could have done this woth a knife that was left in her purse

        • Gljvf@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          You think she couldn’t have stabbed her teacher ?

          Stabbings happen every day in the United states. They are one of the easiest weapons to get a hold of.

          • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Have you even read the story? No, given the same circumstances I don’t believe a six year old with a knife would have been able to stab his teacher through her hand and into her chest. If you honestly believe otherwise I can only conclude you have no idea:

            a) what a gun is. b) what a knife is. c) what a six year old is.

            • Gljvf@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Considering I own multiple guns and multiple knifes I can tell you that a knife can easily go through a hand and into a chest and a six year old would be more than powerful enough to do so.

              Perhaps you only have experience woth butter knifes and steak knives. But I have seen a high quality cooking knives take off fingers like it was a butter knife going through warm butter.

              • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                So it’s six year olds you’re not familiar with. Right you are chief, you keep on believing. Makes you wonder why militaries go to all the expense of having guns when knives are exactly the same don’t it.

                • Gljvf@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I may not be as familiar as you are it seems. However I have multiple young children in my family amd some friends have children ranging from a few months old to teenagers. I certainly know how strong a five year old can be.

                  You should know that knives and bayonets have been used effectively in militaries the world over for over a century

                  But you know that and just do t want to admit it.

                  • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    You’re vastly overestimating how strong a six year old is, the effective range of a six year old with a knife and underestimating how much faster and stronger an able bodied grown adult is in comparison and how relatively easy it is to defend yourself from a six year old you’re literally facing down when they’re limited by their own strength.

                    The bayonet is a weapon of last resort, the US army haven’t trained with them in more than a decade and last fought a bayonet battle 70 years ago, there’s not a professional army on the planet who’s primary weapon is an edged blade. More bad faith horse shit.