Rapidcreek@reddthat.com to News@lemmy.world · 11 months agoCatholic nuns sue Smith & Wesson to halt its assault-style weapons saleswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down112
arrow-up1114arrow-down1external-linkCatholic nuns sue Smith & Wesson to halt its assault-style weapons saleswww.reuters.comRapidcreek@reddthat.com to News@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squarerbesfe@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoNot true https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban
minus-squarechitak166@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·edit-211 months agoAn interesting piece of legislation for sure. (even if it is no longer in effect) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban#Definition_of_assault_weapon I suppose you’d have an argument for any of the ‘named’ firearms that do not exhibit “two or more from a set certain features (featured in link)” Can you name any of them? :)
minus-squarerbesfe@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-211 months agoThe features specified have nothing to do with how lethal a firearm is, that’s my point. It’s purely cosmetic bullshit.
Not true
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban
An interesting piece of legislation for sure. (even if it is no longer in effect)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban#Definition_of_assault_weapon
I suppose you’d have an argument for any of the ‘named’ firearms that do not exhibit “two or more from a set certain features (featured in link)”
Can you name any of them? :)
The features specified have nothing to do with how lethal a firearm is, that’s my point. It’s purely cosmetic bullshit.