Roommates who sued a Maryland county Monday claim police officers illegally entered their apartment without a warrant, detained them at gunpoint without justification and unnecessarily shot their pet dog, which was left paralyzed and ultimately euthanized.

The dog, a boxer mix named Hennessey, did not attack the three officers who entered the apartment before two of them shot the animal with their firearms and the third fired a stun gun at it, according to the federal lawsuit.

The lawsuit seeks at least $16 million in damages over the June 2, 2021 encounter, which started with Prince George’s County police officers responding to a report of a dog bite at an apartment complex where the four plaintiffs lived. What happened next was captured on police body camera video and video from a plaintiff’s cellphone.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Someone shared in another thread that police officers in the U.S. kill something like 10,000 dogs a year. Psychopaths murder dogs. You don’t become a cop unless you’re a psychopath.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      11 months ago

      Never, ever let a cop into your home if you have a dog. Cops are driven by fear and sadism.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        11 months ago

        Never, ever let a cop into your home

        they can come back with a warrant or not at all. the police are absolutely not here to help and nothing will be made better by police involvement.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          11 months ago

          Also don’t open the door for police. I’ve seen numerous encounters where they’ll block the door and refuse to let you close it. Once you try to close it or a gentle breeze comes by an pushes the door into their foot, they’ll violently throw you to the ground, taze you, and then charge you with assaulting a police officer.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not true, I know I guy who got fired from the company I worked for a few years ago, so what did he do when he wasn’t good at the job, he became a police officer.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m sure, I played soccer with him and hung out with him a few times outside of work. Pretty sure I would have noticed if he was a psychopath. Believe it or not, not everybody is a psychopath, and psychology is more complex than the black and white labels people like to dole out in the comments section on the internet.

          • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            If you’re not qualified to diagnose someone as a psychopath, you are equally unqualified to determine that someone is not a psychopath, especially if you’ve only “hung out a few times.”

          • Vanon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Narrator: He was, in fact, a psychopath. His name was… NocturnalMorning. spooky music

    • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not sure if that person was me, but reposting a recent comment I made to that effect anyhow. The estimate and the word “epidemic” both originate from a DOJ report of all things.

      https://www.criminallegalnews.org/news/2018/jun/16/doj-police-shooting-family-dogs-has-become-epidemic/

      I believe the DOJ report is linked somewhere in that article, if not I’ll dig it up if requested.

      Cops in this country kill so many dogs each year that a specialist at the Department of Justice’s (“DOJ”) community-oriented program services office says it has become an “epidemic.” The DOJ estimates that around 25 to 30 dogs are killed by cops every day, with some numbers as high as 10,000 per year. The totals could, in fact, be higher, since most police agencies do not formally track officer-involved shootings involving animals.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/police/police-murder-trial-after-4-years-deays-prince-georges-county-michael-owens/65-5b3df74b-8c73-4e19-b40d-5aa5bc72f70d

    Fun fact about this blatantly criminal police department, they currently have an officer on trial for murder because he shot a suspect 7 times while that suspect was HANDCUFFED AND IN THE FUCKING POLICE CAR

    This incident happened four years ago, and taxpayers who did nothing wrong have already settled with the victim’s family for millions. The judge presiding over the case has openly accused the prosecution of sandbagging the case for four years and rejected a plea deal the prosecution offered the officer because the victim’s family protested that it was too lenient. This man shot and killed a cooperative, restrained suspect and the prosecution is doing everything they can to let him off the hook, down to and including just not having a trial because they think he’ll be convicted. This is what we mean when we say ACAB, that the police engage in blatant, open criminality up to and including murder and then an entire system does everything it can to avoid holding them responsible. Same story with Jackie Johnson, the DA who initially failed to charge the men who murdered Ahmaud Arbery. She’s been charged with misconduct as well, but it’s been years and she’s not even been arraigned. She violated the law and her oath of office in order to cover up a lynching because one of the murderers is an ex-cop and friend of hers, and she’s being protected from the consequences of enabling a lynch mob by a system that knows that the cops are there to use violence to protect aristocrats from the underclass. Same with Freddie Gray. The neighboring police department in Baltimore arrested him for having a knife even though that isn’t illegal, loaded him into a van, then the official story is “no one knows what happened and no one did anything wrong but he died of a broken neck”.

    The police are a street gang. They get to use violence any time they want to without responsibility, and in exchange for that they allow the wealthy to occasionally funnel that violence toward inconvenient people. There is no law, only favor and violence.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    These people did nothing wrong and were accosted by armed thugs in their own home. The dog did nothing wrong and was murdered. The taxpayers did nothing wrong and will pay out tons of money to these people. The police, who did everything wrong, will face no repercussions for their actions because qualified immunity dictates that they didn’t necessarily know that holding innocent people at gunpoint violates their rights.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Pretty fucked up, but not surprising… Why do settlements come from uninvolved taxpayers, rather than the police “union”!?

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      11 months ago

      Paying damages out of police retirement founds would be a simple, one step, foolproof solution to this problem. You don’t want lower retirement? Stop breaking the law. Oh, you’re one of the 5 good cops in the country and this would hurt you even though you did nothing wrong? Actually report the bad cops instead just watching. Thanks.

          • jonne@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The legal fiction that is qualified immunity needs to be banned. It was just made up buy judges.

            • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              It’s fine when used properly. When acting in good faith, officers, just like any company employee, should generally not be held liable.

              However, if they are not acting in good faith, or their actions deviate from good practice, then much like a chemical company employee dumping something toxic out into the environment, then yes they should face personal civil and criminal liability.

              For example, if there’s an active shooter, and the police shoot and kill him, I think most people would agree that that’s acceptable, and the family of the shooter should not have grounds to sue over the shooter’s death.

              If the police walk up and shoot your dog for no reason, that’s unacceptable and they should absolutely face personal liability.

              Per the article:

              “After reviewing all of the evidence in this matter a determination was made that actions of the officers didn’t generate criminal liability because they were acting in good faith,” the office said in a statement to The Post.

              I hope the court disagrees, but I’m not going to hold my breath.

      • RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That gives every cop a financial motive to lie for each other, cover up incidents and silence witnesses.

          • RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            When a psycho cop in the department shoots an innocent kid in the back, the other cops will have to decide either to plant a gun on him or have their their retirement funds drained by a lawsuit.

            • ExLisper@linux.community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              So you’re saying now cops don’t plant guns on people, don’t lie and don’t intimidate witnesses? Have you seen the news, like ever?

      • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Wouldn’t they just quit? Why not just suggest firing the whole lot of them if you’re fine with replacing them?

        • ExLisper@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          It doesn’t matter if they quit or not. It’s the police department that pays damages, no matter if the cops still work there or not (this is how it works now). Once the retirement found looses some $ and the retirements gets lowered cops will be very quick to report bad apples before they actually kill someone (as they should be doing now).

          • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You are incredibly optimistic. I would bet money they just start making deals with criminals like they used to.

    • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      The police are funded by taxpayers, so it doesn’t matter if it’s the city or the police that pay for it, you still foot the bill no matter what. The only solution where citizens don’t lose is if cops are required to carry personal malpractice insurance, like doctors. IMO making cops personally liable for their murders is a good place to start.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        it does matter though because if the money for paying for damages illegally caused by police comes out of their budget they’ll at least feel that until the next year’s budget kicks in. As-is, police are completely removed from any responsibility for their actions.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      FWIW, these judgements are typically paid by the city’s insurance, although that’s also funded by the taxpayers. I don’t know how department policies and the like affect the premiums, but I would really be interested in learning.

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I feel like it’d be worse to have taxpayers care even less about what police are doing. That said, it’s mind-blowing taxpayers don’t seem to care as it is

    • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because you never arm up and surround the precincts.

      Shitlibs screeching in 3…2…

  • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    HEY ANY OF YOU MAGA SHITHEADS WANNA TELL US ABOUT HOW YOU’RE AGAINST GOVERNMENT TYRANNY? YOU GONNA “BACK THE FUCKING BLUE” AGAIN, YOU BUNCH OF PUSSIES?

  • ReallyKinda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    11 months ago

    “ The county offered to compensate Umana for her veterinary bills if she agreed to refrain from publicly speaking about the shooting, but she rejected the offer, according to her lawsuit.”

    Sickening

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ah yes paid vacation for fucking with civilians and shooting their dog

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      But you have to understand that they are actually the victim. Their ego got hurt when the evil civilians refused to answer a question.

  • Gabu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ll be honest, if a policemen did that to a pet of mine, their aim better be good enough to one tap me, otherwise they’re dead.

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Advice I got from a cop for self defense situations. If you have to use lethal force, you’re legally better off if you finish your plate because dead people don’t testify. Be aware of that school of thought, because the cops are too.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d root for you in this hypothetical situation. Their aim isn’t good enough to one tap, that’s why their protocol for dealing with anything remotely scary is to have 10 of them mag dump onto one target.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You’d probably go to prison for life, though. The right to self defense didn’t apply when the aggressor is a cop.