• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    No way, tell me that isnt real. I remember hearing a patent about being able to deliver ads over hdmi but dont tell me it actually got implemented.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          15 days ago

          It doesn’t need to travel over HDMI. That to move signals from one device to another. If the hardware that is outputting the display signal itself wants to insert other data into the signal it’s receiving, it can directly. It doesn’t need to send it through another cable. It’s probably modifying an signal received through HDMI (or other cable), but it doesn’t need to send the modified signal again.

          • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            I’m just stupid and not thinking.

            This sounds like the mental math I did, but I forgot to carry the reality.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      15 days ago

      Why would this need “deliver ads over HDMI”. It’s on the telly, ie the HDMI signal has already been transmitted and now the TV itself is overlaying web-derived images in one corner, the same way it will overlay the guide or whatever when you open it.

    • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      15 days ago

      I totally believe this kind of thing could happens, but I’d expect broader outrage if it were.

      When I set up my LG tv it wanted to show promoted content on the Home Screen and the screensaver.

      I never connect my TV to the internet. People jerk saying they add wireless modems to them but in reality they don’t have to, most prime leave all the telemetry and “AI” features enabled.

      • kabi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        15 days ago

        I’m not sure the picture is edited, but in either case, it would be a lot easier to paste it onto a screencap of the game and open that full screen on the tv…

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Not as bad as this, but when I moved to a new town I got a free big TV with my new ISP. I was going with that ISP anyways so a free 4k HDR TV on top was a nice bonus.

    I wish I had gotten some other bonus. Viewing angle is atrocious and it is impossible to get rid of the input lag (no there isn’t a gaming mode or similar) so no games with precise timing can be played.

    So now we have a big living room TV that is too good to replace with something better but bad enough to be a little bit annoying.

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’m getting from context that this is a smart tv displaying an advertisement, but what the fuck is it even advertising here? A baseball game? Why is the countdown to-the-hour? Why does the player look like a drawing instead of a photo? Why is it specifically that player and not just 'dodgers game tomorrow!"…? It almost looks as if it’s an in-game notification for an MLB-Manager game.

    If it were a burger-king commercial I’d be upset, but the inscrutability of this as an ad at all actually infuriates me.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Nothing to research. They’re all the same bad or will get bad in the foreseeable future. Only thing that matters is the screen technology and the specs of your external media center.

        • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          Sure they want to but they let you disable all of this in the settings. Also a TV with no internet likely will be an unable to serve adds.

          • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            That’s what i say; use the TV as dumb display or deal with enshitification now or later.

            Btw, i have an LG too but i always understood them letting you disable stuff them just anticipating GDPR lawsuits. But seems it’s the same in US? Maybe they really want you not having a bad experience.

            • OneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 days ago

              I mostly like my LG tv, and it’s nice that I can use it without agreeing to their T&C or logging in. It does really piss me off that if I wanted to change picture settings (brightness, color, etc) I’d have to turn their adware settings back on.

      • zod000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        You mean it doesn’t have any of this yet :)

        I say this as someone with two LG TVs. Sure you can just not connect them to the internet, but a lot of people rely on the “Smart” part of the TV to view all their content.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    15 days ago

    I can’t believe this is real. I’ve just bought a relatively cheap Samsung smart TV and it’s got nothing close to this. I would hardly even say it’s got adverts since it’s mostly just recommendations from my apps in the same way they all do now, I don’t think I’ve actually seen it try to sell me anything or get me to watch something that wasn’t free.

    Who the fuck would buy a TV like this? If a company was going to introduce on-screen ads like this they’d start really small.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        I didn’t exactly do a lot of research into either of the two TVs I have and neither of them have ads like this.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          I don’t mean they do this consistently, but that they do this by chance. sometimes people end up spending money on bad brands

  • 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 days ago

    Is there an open-source version of Google TV and similar smart TV software? I feel like i read about one quite recently.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Connecting a Raspberry pi or a Linux computer into the HDMI port. And not connecting the TV to WiFi.

      Smart TV’s can be used as dumb TV’s by not connecting them to the internet. Likewise the HDMI port can connect your own device for the smart functionality.

      • 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yes, im aware of those ways. I remember reading that there was a replacement that was specifically emulating the look and feel of Google TV, but simpler and better. You could install it on Chromecast etc.

      • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yeah but is there an OS or a Linux distro specifically geared for use with a “surrogate SmartTV”?

        It could also be used by connecting the device to a large monitor, as those are cheaper than SmartTVs. No point paying a premium for features you don’t intend to use.

        On a related point, what would you do for a remote control in such a setup?

        • MeatsOfRage@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          Yea I always hear people say just hook up a PC or Pi but I don’t want a keyboard and mouse in my livingroom. The value of these Apple TV / Roku / Google TV setups is you have a little remote and a UI that is designed around it with big visual elements you can see across the room. I’m surprised there seems to be so little movement on something like this.

          I guess one issue is apps. The likes of Netflix wouldn’t support it.

  • FolknForage@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 days ago

    Ads and bloat are the main reason I still use my 1080p Bravia from 15 yrs ago, which btw still looks great.

    Well, that and that I have better uses for 1k usd

    • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 days ago

      This really seems to be the right answer. At least while computer monitors stay dumb.

      Get one of those tiny PCs that you can just leave behind the TV, get a wireless mouse and keyboard too.

      Nothing on TV isn’t available online anyway. Paying the cable company for anything more than an Internet connection seems like setting money on fire to me. Maybe sports would be difficult, but that can literally be found if you know what you’re doing. Even games you wouldn’t be able to with TV.

      Cable TV just seems to me like a boomer’s version of the Internet. It has no place in a world with the Internet, change my mind. The ads on TV are worse than what you find on any popular website/app.

      But as usual, capitalism is messing everything up with the marketing. In a world where hi speed Internet is widely available, “TV” just has no use. None. And worse, the commercials are now leaking through your literal screen.

      I’m not saying that ads aren’t a problem, but there’s a hell of a lot more you can do about them.

      In a perfect world, there would be a place you could go whenever you wanted something and find products and solutions for that thing, and there wouldn’t be ads in anything else at all.

      But until there’s an actual argument to say TV technology isn’t totally worthless, my stance is simply “no TVs are necessary or useful”.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        You can get little combined keyboard/track pads for $20-30. They’re the same size as a remote, usually rechargeable, and kind of a pain to type on… But perfect for typing in the name of what you’re searching for

        • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Yeah I leave it at my brother’s house for our weekly movie and TV day, and he had them already so I didn’t spend more than like 15 minutes looking at those.

          But it’s on the back burner for a QoL update like that.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    when i order a screen in asia to germany i pay a lot less taxes than when ordering a tv or smarttv. so buying a smartTV is kinda dumb anyways.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’ve seen LG getting trashed alongside the other offenders in the industry in smart TV discussions. I have an LG CX65 OLED from 2020, and I’ve always seen the onboard WebOS as pretty serviceable. Have they gotten a lot worse in the last few years? And/or does it vary by product price?

    There are definitely some advertising options to turn off in the menus, and with all that taken care of the only UI I use is a row of app icons that pops up. No ads anywhere, and I don’t seem to be logged into the TV with any kind of account. (Though typing this reminded me that the cheap LG LCD in my son’s room does want a login in order to update firmware)

    Note I said it was serviceable, not great. The UI could be more responsive on better hardware, but it’s also convenient for my family to just be able to use the Wiimote-like motion pointer built into the remote.

    • _bcron@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      I have a newer C4 and I don’t think it’s bad. It’s not too obtrusive and there are guides to opt out of everything, but then again I’m not too concerned with data privacy in regard to my television, so I might be biased

    • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      I have an LG, which is…fine.

      But what I do like about it is that I basically never have to interact with its OS. 100% of my content is watched through an Apple TV. I turn it on with the ATV remote and it goes immediately to the correct HDMI input.