• orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      remembers Pulp Fiction scene least that’s what comfortable silence makes me think of, and yes I agree, it’s nice when a couple people can sit down and not feel like they have to say anything.

        • orbitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Holy crap I had no idea it was an actual anniversary! I just think in pop culture bits (memes). Neat. I so remember the first time watching it in the early teens, Tarantino can sure write fun random dialogue also sure was fun seeing Travolta be awesome again at the time after the baby movies. Not that I didn’t enjoy Look Who’s Talking,at the time, but who remembers those after Pulp Fiction for Travolta?

  • yemmly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    What if I told you: People who hate small talk only have meaningful relationships. It’s the shallow relationships they lack.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    personally im a firm believer in the shut the fuck up and be quiet camp.

    Who cares if you talk. If you have something to talk about, talk about it, if not, don’t it’s that simple.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pretty sure being in a long term relationship means you’ve moved on from small talk a long time ago.

    I don’t want to talk with my wife about the weather, we have more important shit to worry about unless we’re literally having to dodge a tornado.

    Small talk is for strangers.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yup. And if we don’t have anything more important to talk about, we’ll just cuddle. Silence is absolutely fine with people you’re comfortable with.

      • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Huh.

        Wife and I talk ALL the time about anything and everything, be it the weather, how weather works, of free will exists, the kids, if kids exists, you name it…

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Maybe you’re both extroverts?

          We’re both introverts, so we’re totally comfortable just sitting next to each other reading different books, or cuddling on a cold winter night. Sometimes we talk about random stuff, but quite often we’re exhausted from dealing with other people but still want that proximity.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      If you went outside and the weather was pleasant you’d never mention it to your wife? Never say anything like “have you been outside? It’s so nice today!”

      • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Genuine appreciation for the weather enough to declare it to those around you isn’t small talk. Small talk is generic filler dialogue you do as a formality.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you’re being that reductive about the definition of small talk then I don’t think small talk exists between couples who have known each other for a long time because you’re just regular talking.

  • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    If my partner can’t handle silence, then there’s something seriously wrong. We usually have something to do and if we don’t we just cuddle up. There’s no need for constant noise.

  • MobileDecay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Imagine having a relationship based on talking about the weather today. I talk about things I enjoy talking about. If I don’t have anything to say then quiet is peaceful. 😊

  • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    276
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sometimes you don’t need to fill the silence with sounds. I’d rather be in a relationship with someone that we can sit down and be quiet together

    • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Or you can use literal sounds instead of words. My spouse and I have this thing going on where we make this kind of squeak/baloon sound with our mouth which has the same effect as “hi, nice to see you”.

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh thank god my partner and I aren’t the only ones. Don’t get me wrong, we know and like that we’re weird, but it’s nice to have company.

      • gassygiant@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        My wife and I do things in threes: three taps, three nudges, three blinks, three noises, whatever. It means “I love you”. It’s a nice way to say it when you’re too tired to say it. I think it originated when we’d say it as we were falling asleep.

      • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Me and my gf usually say Ahoozles (shortened from Anyhoozles) and just a way of saying “I want to talk to you, I just don’t know what I want to talk about

        • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          We just say “you know…” and then the other person will either say “yep/same” or “no I don’t know” depending on the mood. And if the cat makes noise we’ll also just say “I know buddy me too”

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        They did say “sometimes”, but it seems like you took that to mean “all the times”?

        • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Everything is a balance and people are different anyways. I don’t know many people who like any of the extremes. But it’s a different amount for everyone. And the “partner” thing is strange anyways. As long as you’re madly in love, you probably enjoy hearing about every pea in their canteen meal. That might fade after 20 years of marriage. Or a stressful day at work. Or with kids. Or it doesn’t. Both is fine. As long as it’s consenting partners. 😆

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    4 days ago

    Wife and I have a longstanding argument over whether free-will exists.

    I say it does and she has no choice but to say otherwise.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      One time I was talking about this with my friends. I said I believe it exists and they all laughed and said “particles have rules, you’re made of particles.” 🥺

    • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Consider this, free will can still be pre-planned. We can choose what we want to do, so what if it was pre planned? I still chose it.

            • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              The meaning of free will is exactly what people are discussing when they talk about whether or not it exists. What does and what doesn’t count as free will is what’s up for discussion.

              • flashgnash@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                I think free will as a concept is kinda stupid I’ve yet to talk to anyone who can actually give it a solid definition that isn’t something like “it means we can do what we want”

                Either your decision is based on your personality, meaning it’s not free it’s a set calculation based on genetics and accumulated experience or it’s completely random meaning it’s not will at all

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Free will as a philosophical concept has less to do with “I can do what I want” and more to do with “I have control over my actions/thoughts.” This gets into all sorts of interesting corners, such as:

                  • if God exists and is all-knowing, can God know what you’re about to do? If God does, is it really your choice, or just something God planned long ago?
                  • if God doesn’t exist, then we’re all products of everything that came before. Assuming that’s the case, a sufficiently powerful computer with a sufficiently large amount of data could determine what you’re about to do. If that’s the case, is it really your choice, or are you just a really complex automaton where the inputs (your life experiences and current situation) exactly determine your actions?
                  • in either of the above cases, if you’re unaware that another observer knows what you’ll do, do you retain free will? Does free will disappear the moment you learn of this observer? Can knowing about the observer change your actions in an unpredictable way, or can actions always be predicted?

                  And so on. There are some interesting discussions there at the edges, like at what point AI gains free will. That can have very real moral implications (i.e. when does AI get personhood?), so it’s not just idle chat.

                • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  If you just start talking to some random person about it, then you’re unlikely to get a high-quality conversation; because most of the stuff people will say about it is inane or obvious or obviously wrong, etc. But there are definitely interesting discussions and thoughts that can be had about it. I’ve had countless garbage conversations about, and a handful of good ones. Probably my favoutite take is from Daniel Dennett’s book “Freedom Evolves”. He is very careful to build up a strong picture of what is it that we’re talking about and what the ‘obvious’ problems are, before then carefully and systematically showing those things aren’t really problems with what we were talking about anyway. Before reading that book, I was hard line in the camp of “obviously free will doesn’t exist; that’s a scientific fact”; but after reading it… well, I’d now say “it depends exactly what you mean, but probably the free will you’re talking about does exist.”.

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Can your free will be restricted in any way? Someone in prison has less agency than you or I, if that means his free will is restricted then we have more free will than he does. Therefore it exists.

      • thirteene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Why do we need to bother executing it then? Choice has no value if agency to exercise it is revoked at any stage.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              When I get my ballot with an uncontested seat, I can still choose whether to check the box. Even though it doesn’t impact the outcome at all, I still have the choice on whether to check the box. Even if I am completely restrained and my movements are forced, I still have the choice of whether to accept or resist that action, even if it’s just a mental protest.

              So I don’t think there’s ever a case where there are no other options, but there are plenty of situations where there are no other good options (e.g. cake or death), but that doesn’t restrict your free will, it just restricts your options.

        • theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I want to rebuke you but you name is even more triggering. There is no linear chaos, you need non-linearities or discontinuities for chaos.

          • linearchaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Glad I could be of use.

            The concept behind linear chaos is that the chaos is bound at one point. The theoretical cone of influence can only move in one direction and widen at a set rate. Kind of a mashup of chaos over time.

              • linearchaos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Yeah, chaos crops up in linear systems sometimes in unexpected places.

                There are a couple of scientific papers on it, and at least one textbook. Even at that I’m not sure it’s a well-accepted theory, but the idea suits me.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, that depends what you mean by small talk. I think you know what you mean, but I’m not sure that we know what you mean.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    185
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Its only “small talk” if you dont actually care about what the other person says. If you are genuinely interested, then its just a conversation. Thats how i see it at least.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, this. Talking small is faking interest. I’m not good at that. But when I actually care about the other person, “what have you been up to” is meaningful. Cause I actually wanna know.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah but small talk can get the ball rolling on a real conversation. It’s just a way of initiating a conversation and it’s giving an opportunity for someone to talk about things they might be interested in.

      “It’s nice day out today!” doesn’t literally mean that. It means “there’s an opportunity for us to do something outside if you’d like, but if not, perhaps you’d care to discuss something that’s important to you instead? Of course you you aren’t interested in having conversation or doing an activity, I’m perfectly fine with that too” but in a significantly more concise way. Sure you don’t really care about their opinion on the weather or whatever small talk, but it’s a completely open-ended expression of a willingness to have a conversation about something that matters to the other person. It’s opportunity to have a real conversation without any pressure to have a real conversation.

      Also it’s not that hard to do.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah but small talk can get the ball rolling on a real conversation.

        It can also be used defensively to avoid having the ball get rolling on a real conversation. This is a key defensive use of small talk which can be deployed at occasions such as “Family Gatherings”, “Workplace Water Coolers”, “Sports Events”.

        If you know your relative is a conspiracy theorist and will inevitably try to use a gap in the conversation to talk about how the Jews are using their Space Laser to Direct Hurricanes at Lithium Deposits to Remove the Lawful Inhabitants from their Rightful Land… deploy small talk to avoid this.

        P.S. Avoid “the weather” as that’s an opening to talk about how the recent hurricane was controlled by Blackrock.

        • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          To be fair, had it been possible to control hurricanes, I have no doubt that Blackrock would try to use it to extract profit but they’re hardly alone in that.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sure, but the real evidence that these conspiracies are bullshit is that it involves all these wealthy, powerful people working together. Sure, Blackrock would want to use weather control technology, if it existed, to clear people off land it wanted. But, there are plenty of other billionaires or centi-billionaire companies who would want to know about and use weather control technology. For example, Disney. They’re a nearly 200 billion dollar company that make a lot of their money from cruises, theme parks and resorts, places which are dependent on good weather. If there were any hint that weather control technology were real, they’d be using it to keep the weather good at their resorts. If Blackrock were using weather control tech in a way that might wreck things at Disney World, do you think Disney would just go along with it?

            There are a few things that rich people agree on, like wanting to keep their wealth. But, mostly they got rich because they were incredibly selfish. The idea that they could maintain any kind of conspiracy to do anything other than keep taxes low is pretty insane.

      • yokonzo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        “it’s not that hard to do” is absolutely giving never had a mental illness vibes

    • exasperation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean that’s basically why a lot of us are great at small talk: we actually do care about the contents of that low stakes conversation with strangers.

    • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yup, the only two things small talk and conversation have in common is that they take a minimum of two people and involve spoken words.

      • Opisek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        If people small-talk in sign language, would it be called small-talk?

        Your remark about “spoken words” made be think about this and I find it curious, since “small-talk” has become something of a fixed expression.

        While words related to vocal conversations do appear in other phrases like “being left speechless” for example, I imagine “small-talk” to be more of a thing on its own in today’s usage.

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s a good point - do we “speak” sign language? I’d never given it much thought. I think it was lazy writing on my behalf; the phrase “spoken words” could probably be tweaked to make it more obviously inclusive of all the signers out there.

  • Sigilos@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    202
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The key to understanding is finishing the sentence.

    “I hate small talk… with people I have no reason to talk to and don’t care about.

    I love my partner, and even when it’s small talk I can listen all day, just to hear their voice and learn a little more about them, to feel closer to the person I married in many small ways.

    But I don’t care about what Jim at the laundry mat did last weekend, or which machine he thinks makes socks dry faster.

    • variants@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      But small talk is what got you your wife. What if Jim can be your future if you just gave him the time

      • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Drag didn’t get drag’s dragon by doing small talk. Drag’s dragon fell in love with drag because it was impressed with drag’s magic.

        Get yourself a girlfriend by impressing her with your arcane talents.

      • HonouraryDragon@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, this one met its rider when it was searching for other worlds and happened upon drag performing a healing rite to a sickly dragon. How could one not love that that kind of power used for good?

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      But I don’t care about what Jim at the laundry mat did last weekend, or which machine he thinks makes socks dry faster.

      tough. :) here’s what he (might have) said: it’s the 2nd and 3rd dryers from the left. the smaller ones. you also need to use the smaller ‘double load’ front-loading washers. those have an extra extract cycle and get the most water out. the dryers used to literally only cost 25c to dry most loads (an extra quarter for all denim or something), but they (new owners of the laundry) increased the minimum needed per-load to $1.50 (on top of more than doubling the washers’ prices). greedy bastards.

  • hitsuji_nanka@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    How did everyone take this post to mean that you should only do small talk with your partner and not have deeper conversations?

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think this was written by someone who isn’t comfortable with extended periods of silence with their partner.

      My wife and I barely speak or communicate nonverbally for hours sometimes, then talk at great length other times. We always give each other an opportunity to talk about our day or whatever else is important, but we don’t talk about trivial things simply for the sake of talking. We’re comfortable with silence.

      • hitsuji_nanka@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Idk I took it more to mean “wow I don’t want to start a deep, thoughtful conversation the moment I get home from work let me relax for a minute” while at the same time still wanting to talk to your partner. But I guess it’s up to reader interpretation and I do seem to be in the minority here.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          You’re not alone. I think people might be projecting their own reasons for liking/disliking smalltalk into this tweet.

          • hitsuji_nanka@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            I just feel like a lot of people here are defining “small talk” as “a conversation that I don’t want to have” rather than any meaningful definition.

            I would consider stepping outside in the morning with your partner and stating “oh wow it’s such a nice day today” to be small talk. It’s a conversation without an end goal, sure, but I don’t think it’s as worthless as people are making it out to be.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah, like, obviously if you define it as something like that you don’t like that, but I don’t think that’s how everyone defines it.

    • Yprum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      My bet is, for the same reason that the post assumes that people who hate smalltalk can’t have a meaningful relationship

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      There’s likely at least a small correlation between people who dislike small talk and being at least somewhat socially inept.

      (This doesn’t mean I’m saying everyone who dislikes small talk is socially inept. That’s not how correlations work.)

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I would say it is likely complex. One might also assume for similar simplistic reasons that small talk is primarily used by people who get insecure if someone else isn’t constantly acknowledging their presence by talking with them about something.

        Likely neither of those simplistic explanations do the full complexity of social dynamics justice.