• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    My point is the agreement was for an entirely unrelated product. A restaurant is in no way associated with the Disney+ streaming service. No one would expect the terms and conditions from a streaming service to apply to a sit down restaurant.

    I’d even say that while they’re both under the Disney brand, they almost certainly are separate companies, further differentiating their products.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I know and agree. What I’m saying is that the courts and especially conservative justices don’t care. Should Disney be sanctioned for this bad faith attempt? Absolutely! But will Disney be? Probably not. Is it possible Disney’s motion to compel or dismiss will be granted. It is definitely possible.