• Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have no idea why you’re being downvoted. The fishing industry is possibly the biggest monster in the world and people are just fine with what they can not see. I used to own a sailboat. I can tell say first hand it can be disgusting out there. Ya’ll need to watch some documentaries. Thousands of marine animals are being slaughtered right now while you’re reading this.

    • variants@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have no idea why you’re being downvoted.

      Probably because shooting a random dolphin isn’t great

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah taking “single dolphin shot repeatedly” to “but what about the fishing industry” isn’t a productive take, it’s whataboutism. They are independent issues, and trying to put focus on one removes the focus from the other

        • amzd@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think it’s good to make people connect their disdain for animal abuse to something they can actually do something about

              • nac82@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                7 months ago

                Racism is a subset of speciesism (which is when you think it is okay to kill some species but not others) so I think the comparison is reasonable.

                Direct quote of you equating different races to different species.

                • amzd@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Racism: “You can put those people in a camp because they have a different skin color”
                  Speciesism: “You can put those beings in a camp because they have feathers”

                  The step you need, to go from “racism is wrong” to “speciesism is wrong” is to extend your circle of compassion to all sentient animals and not just humans.

            • aiccount@monyet.cc
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              It is amazing to watch someone’s mind melt like this just because the truth of their food source is pointed out to them. This is a full-blown insane comment.

                • aiccount@monyet.cc
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Anybody who gets so triggered and defensive when someone points out how disgusting factory farms are doesn’t have a diet that they are proud of. Whether your cognitive dissonance allows you to acknowledge that or not is a different story.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I don’t think this is whataboutism in its most deflective form; I think it’s, “Why are we concerned about a one-off incident but not looking at the elephant in the room?”

          I guess I don’t consider things whtaaboutism if it’s pointing to something that encapsulates the original issue. These issues are not mutually-exclusive and signal the same problem: It’s just asking why people are inconsistent with their outrage. In other words, whataboutism in this context can be effective when pointing out hypocrisy and double-standards.

          To contrast, whataboutism as a deflection tends to be a substitute for, “You did it, too! Thus ignore what I did / what I did wrong is justified.” Again, this is not that.

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Except one (shooting a dolphin repeatedly) is an act of sport or maliciousness, while the slaughter of marine mammals is an issue of the fishing industry. It’s like someone locking someone up in their basement vs the unjust imprisonment for many inmates that happens in the US. One is personal, and specific, one is systemic, happens all the time, and needs to be approached with a broader scope. They are all wrong, but you can’t lump them together because you are generally upset

            • lennybird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              I think we can absolutely say that industrialized slaughter is objectively worse in terms of the scale of suffering for the victims. We abstract the moral suffering in the fishing farm; but whoa, if someone individually shoots an animal — totally different! At the end of the day, scale is what matters.

              Personally I couldn’t care less about the assailant’s state of mind; what matters is the victim

              • kautau@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                I never said one was worse, I just said that derailing the conversation of one to focus on the other wasn’t productive

                • lennybird@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I disagree because it connects two topics — one that is generally accepted by society — to another that everyone perceives as wrong because of an intimate emotional reaction.

                  • kautau@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Sure, but instead of saying “what about the shit they are doing to other sea life,” it could be worded as “this is a good time to check up on what’s going on with the fishing industry in general, here’s some links, and ways you can help”

                    One is just telling people they are assholes for even caring about the shot dolphin and should be better people by caring about bigger issues, the other is knowing people will care about the emotional story and then guiding them to learn more about the shit that happens in the fishing industry. People are emotional, you can’t just say “hey dummies what about this” and expect it to connect, it doesn’t help, you need to guide people.

                    Saying this is unimportant and people should focus elsewhere is disruptive and doesn’t move people toward bigger issues. Connecting this to bigger issues through conversation and generally better rhetoric does

        • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s a one time incident. This is like when everyone lost their minds when a single turtle got a straw stuck in its nose. I’m not saying that wasn’t a bad thing. Just like I never said someone shooting a dolphin isn’t horrible.

          But why offer a 20K reward for this while completely ignoring the mass slaughter taking place every day? Talk about unproductive.