• GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Which kept the manufacturers working, kept the supply chains moving, and aligned nearly all of the west onto a shared, network-able platform? These things literally get more deadly when more are in use. All in a jet that is better than most (not all) of the near peer opponents.

        Man it certainly ran over budget but now it’s a steal of a deal for all that allied interop.

        Plus keeping the aerospace contractors moving means you keep potential wartime production avenues open and lubed.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The only cost I can find that is anywhere near that order of magnitude for the F-35 is the total lifetime cost out to 2070 (!!!), which includes operations and maintenance in the figure for the approx seven decades of its total expected life.