• GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Which kept the manufacturers working, kept the supply chains moving, and aligned nearly all of the west onto a shared, network-able platform? These things literally get more deadly when more are in use. All in a jet that is better than most (not all) of the near peer opponents.

      Man it certainly ran over budget but now it’s a steal of a deal for all that allied interop.

      Plus keeping the aerospace contractors moving means you keep potential wartime production avenues open and lubed.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The only cost I can find that is anywhere near that order of magnitude for the F-35 is the total lifetime cost out to 2070 (!!!), which includes operations and maintenance in the figure for the approx seven decades of its total expected life.