• nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m sure this guy did fear for his life. I am sure he did feel like the safest thing he could do in that moment for himself was to fire directly into the unknown car.

    And that’s why he doesn’t belong in our society. He is not welcome to participate given that the above is true, and we need to remove him until the end of time to ensure that no such thing can ever happen again.

    • 4lan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      We just let anybody have a gun these days

      I say that as a firearm owner and manufacturer. Anytime somebody asks me about my guns I explain to them how any 13-year-old could have done the same thing and how are gun laws are completely broken

      You can be pro gun in pro regulation at the same time, fuck all these false dichotomies

  • Moggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    In my experience, overly fearful people that get terrified over nothing are the primary audience for gun ownership. The mindset it takes to responsibly own and carry a gun is RARE.

    I have 60+ year old relatives that suddenly all decided they wanted a gun, just because one of them bought one and won’t shut up about the confidence it gives her. She literally bought it just to walk to and from her car, which is parked directly in front of the business SHE owns, despite there being absolutely zero crime happening in her parking lot, and not bothering to set up security cameras. She literally bought a gun because she was afraid of a non-existent problem, and made no non-violent effort to correct the issue. I’m waiting for her to shoot some poor homeless person asking for change…

    If owning a gun makes you confident, then you’re a scared little baby. Especially the guys with big trucks that drive like they’re trying to provoke people. I KNOW you have a gun. You bought the little dick pride set, so there’s no way you don’t have a gun. Quit trying to make excuses to pull it out. Pussies. FYI, I’m driving slow in front of you BECAUSE you’re driving like an ass hole and riding my bumper. Wave your gun at me again. I do not care.

    • Shialac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      In my experience most people that get a gun because they are “terrified” are just waiting for an excuse to finally kill another person

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Unfortunately, as you get older and closer to death, fear becomes a big factor in your life. This is the reaction you see from boomers. They can’t verbalize or even comprehend the fear of death, so it manifests in these bizarre behavioral patterns.

      Source: Myself

    • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You hang out with the wrong crowd. I’ve belonged to several gun clubs over the years, of the many hundreds of people I’ve gotten to know, I’ve met probably a dozen who fit the profile you describe. IMO the difference is socialization: if guns are a right but at the same time you make guns a taboo and actively discourage organized events and interest shooting sports, the people who do not go into it with a healthy mind and diverse social life end up dwelling on whatever someone feeds them for clicks and ad revenue (Fox News and similar shit, not even partisan just scary news gets clicks and trains fear into people). Shooting is fun if you do it right.

      • Moggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Hanging out with the wrong crowd? It’s my family. And about half of them aren’t even Republicans. If anything, THEY hang out with the wrong crowd. And considering that you make guns such a large part of your identity, even making it a regular social interaction, I have a hard time believing that you’ll look at it from anyone else’s perspective. I especially doubt your ability to judge who should and shouldn’t have a gun, because you literally go to clubs full of people and judge their ability to responsibly own a gun off of their social skills, which for many people is a facade they create to seem normal. I doubt that the guy who’s excited to kill people is talking about it like that at club time. And my problem isn’t just intent. My problem with my family, specifically, is that they’re all a bunch of scared little bitches who are going to shoot at the first thing that scares their precious little baby asses. And I’ve met a shitload of fearful gun owners. I grew up in the South. Saying you’ve only met a dozen, means that you don’t pay attention, you excuse more than you should, or you’re just lying.

        • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          What makes you think it’s so central to my identity? (Granted I’ve got way more hobbies than most people, I’m sure it’s an innocent assumption.) Sorry about your family.

          We might have different ways of judging people. I learned to judge character long before I ever touched my first gun (as an adult), and do not defer or equate a person’s identity to their character.

          Yeah people lie, but in the orgs I belong to everyone has the keys and full access to nice facilities, and is treated like an adult - consider that a litmus test, or a baseline level of trust which is exceedingly rare to have someone break. You think fearful people just sign up to be on a “cold” range (unarmed) where someone else is running around with a loaded gun (e.g. USPSA), and submit fully to whoever’s running the range that day? Or join the club at the police or military range? There’s way more fear at the universities (and I live at one of the biggest right now).

          Yeah I’m not in the south, only every lived in big cities that are as blue as it gets.

      • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        With appropriate legislation and social norms, I’d agree with you.

        So I don’t agree with you.

        We really need responsible gun owners to form a bloc, and shun the gun nuts and work with the left for gun legislation.

        • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Answer this: how do you work on legislation to ensure responsible gun ownership with someone who detests any form of civilian gun ownership and absolutely refuses to learn the intricacies? How do you collaborate with someone who thinks themselves to be above understanding what they’re working on? Sensible things HAVE been proposed by people with a deep understanding of guns, but they get spit on because they’re something other than another ban on an inconsequential feature or function or type of something.

          Edit to add: I cannot count the number of times I’ve given someone a chance and nearly every time the answer to “are you open to the possibility of your side being wrong about anything at all” is along the lines of me being the one who needs to be schooled by someone with zero firearms experience about why banning some specific things will solve mass shootings. On the other hand, I’ve taken many anti gun people shooting, and taught them some basics, and that changed a lot about how they viewed what they’d previously been told. Internet scholars will say this invalidates their ability to be objective and so their opinion no longer counts.

          The evidence, that is total intolerance to the actual ideas and proposals by gun owners, and pushing for more of the same that didn’t work the first few times, shows that legislators actual objectives are total disarmament, not the safety and lives of good people.

          • set_secret@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            At least 18 apparently.

            It’s such a shame Americans brains are completely dysfunctional when it comes to guns. Despite literally overwhelming evidence that guns are a errible, terrible idea to be so easily accessible. Somehow what you you’d usually call a socially progressive person becomes more like a raving lunatic to most others outside of the USA when it comes to guns…

            It’s honestly a fascinating phenomenon, it’s just really, really tragic.

      • Thassodar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I was literally thinking about this case when turning around in someone’s driveway this week. Great precedent for conservatives who believe minorities are around every corner trying to take their homes.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          While shooting someone for turning around in your driveway is absolutely ridiculous, I’d also say turning around in some rando’s driveway to be on the rude side.

          • BakerBagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            It happens all the time and only takes 5 seconds tops. It has probably happened to you multiple times and you never noticed.

            • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I also have a downslope driveway that ices up in the winter, and have had someone hit my car and take off doing it, so yeah I’d rather they didn’t. I also respect people’s private property.

              • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Things might be different in the US, but here in NZ the first meter or two off the road is usually road reserve, which is council property. That’s where footpaths/sidewalks, street trees, and utilities are run.

                The bit of your driveway that is actually yours doesn’t start until about where your front fence is, if you have one.

              • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                I also respect people’s private property.

                That’s about the most asinine way you possibly could have ended that sentence. You almost had my sympathy for why you feel the way you do until said that.

                • meyotch@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I respect people. If a person I respect has property, by the transitive property, the property gets a sort of respect.

      • TheControlled@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve known a lot of gun nuts and none of them were psychopathic, no matter their politics. This guy isn’t a gun nut, he’s a monster.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Judge Adam Michelini slammed Monahan in court, saying

    NO HE DIDN’T. He SLAMMED Monahan by giving a calm milquetoast “what you did is awful and you should feel ashamed” statement? I wanna see a judge suplex a motherfucker before I see the word SLAM used in this context again

    • TheOneCurly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Minimum 25 years actually in a prison +/- some minor adjustments for behavior and then he’ll be eligible to request release on parole. But if parole isn’t granted there’s no upper limit on how long he can continue to spend in prison.

  • motor_spirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I hope this pussy lives in fear and doesn’t have a comfortable hour for the rest of his useless existence

    God damn conservatives and gun people are the biggest bunch of frail cunts on this planet

    • Lemmy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I own a firearm because I don’t want to be a victim again. Until you know what its like to truly fear for your life, only then you’d understand.

      Although, I’m not going to defend this guy who ruthlessly shot that poor girl, simply no excuse for that.

      • hips_and_nips@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Just because you have a firearm doesn’t make you part of the “gun people” generalization.

        Do you fantasize about getting to shoot your gun? Have you tied your identity to your arsenal of guns? Do you feel the need to open carry at the grocery store? Do you open fire on cars in your driveway?

        No? Then you’re not in the “gun people” group being talked about. People who own guns are not the same as the “gun people”, or “gun nuts”/“ammosexuals”.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Just because you have a firearm doesn’t make you part of the “gun people” generalization.

          Actually that’s kinda exactly what it means when people say “all gun owners blah blah blah.”

          Do you fantasize about getting to shoot your gun? Have you tied your identity to your arsenal of guns? Do you feel the need to open carry at the grocery store? Do you open fire on cars in your driveway?

          No, no, concealed (especially after Buffalo), and the last one is called “crime.”

          No? Then you’re not in the “gun people” group being talked about. People who own guns are not the same as the “gun people”, or “gun nuts”/“ammosexuals”.

          Disagree. If I say all women are sluts, but then some nun says “well I’m not,” I can’t claim I wasn’t talking about “all women” when I said “all women.” It’s preposterous. By that same coin, when someone says “all gun owners,” they can’t claim to "only be talking about the bad ones.” One should instead be more specific, like say “irresponsible gun owners blah blah blah,” if one wishes to make the distinction between “all” and “bad.”

          *Disclaimer: No, I don’t believe all women are sluts, I was using it as an example of a stupid generalization specifically. I shouldn’t have to add this disclaimer, but we all know I have to before some cheesedick decides that was my argument and argues with a strawman.

          • hips_and_nips@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            “Gun people” != “all gun owners”

            They didn’t say “all gun owners” they said “gun people” which to anyone with awareness can infer it means the people who tie their identity to their weapons.

            What a shitty analogy to women, I’m not even going to touch that.

            Would it have been clearer if the original comment said “irresponsible gun people”, sure, but it wasn’t and self-centered people want to be the victim when they haven’t understood they aren’t even in the group.

            I’m Dutch and even I could glean the intended meaning from the context.

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah so if I say “woman people” I’m not talking about all of them, only a specific subsect that I failed to describe, and then I’m confused why people think I’m generalizing?

              C’mon, “gun people” is a clear generalization that clearly implies “all gun owners.” He could’ve said “irresponsible gun owners” to single out those who he wished to refer to, but he didn’t, thus the “confusion.” If it was actually his wish to single out those people, actually doing so in the future would help his posts not be misunderstood.

              Lol yes, don’t bother touching how dumb generalizations are, make them instead.

              So you’re telling me that making generalizations about a group is good, and if someone in that group feels like the generalization is unfair and doesn’t reflect them or reality, they should stop being a snowflake? You by chance voting for an orange this election?

              Ah, Dutch, that explains it. The Dutch love to generalize.

        • Lemmy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You said: ‘gun people are the biggest bunch of frail cunts’

          What about the people who physically can’t protect themselves? Are you going to call a rape victim who has a gun to protect themselves a frail cunt?

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Yes, they have no business carrying a deadly weapon. I’m not minimizing the crime nor the impact on the victim, quite the contrary. Unless there’s a serious reason to expect recurrence and law enforcement is no help, you’re giving a traumatized untrained person a deadly weapon. You’re setting that victim up to murder an innocent person.

            How is this person any different than you hypothetical rape victim? I don’t know why he may have been living in fear, but having a deadly weapon just meant that a traumatized untrained person murdered an innocent person.

            • Lemmy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              1.) Do you expect all criminals to follow the law?

              2.) Are you assuming that every rape victim is crazy?

              3.) What about when law enforcement doesn’t show up in time?

              4.) How do you know they’re not 3D printing firearms?

              5.) What about when your government becomes tyrannical?

              • AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago
                1. I assume innocent people far outnumber criminals

                2. I assume many rape victims, and many other people are traumatized. I assume they may act out of fear.

                3. I assume the likelihood of anyone defending themselves from an actual threat is very low, especially someone acting out of fear, especially someone untrained. They’re not likely to be making rational, responsible choices, nor able to reliably do what they intend. You’re just trading one problem for another

                4. I assume someone 3D printing a weapon is a stupid edge case. Very few people can do it, it’s unlikely to work well, more likely to injure the user. Most importantly no one is 3D printing a gun on impulse, emotion, fear

                5. protecting yourself from a tyrannical government is completely unrealistic, and you could argue already here. Governments will always have many orders of magnitude more resources than you, many more deadly weapons, and many more practiced killers. Most importantly we’re no longer in a time when most of the governments weapons are people bringing their own musket. It’s more important than ever to defend against a tyrannical government, but frightened people shooting anyone who turns around in their driveway or knocks on their door is not the way to do it.

                • Lemmy@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  1.) That doesn’t really mean anything.

                  2 & 3.) How do you know they didn’t receive help/treatment? Also, you can’t just assume that every person is the same, most people go out of their way to get proper training to use a firearm.

                  4.) No, it’s gotten way easier, there are blueprints everywhere online freely available and guides on how to make 3D printed guns at home.

                  5.) Why did the USA pull out of Afghanistan then? We have the best military in the world, yet we couldn’t beat the people who live in the desert that had basically nothing? Urbanization is a nightmare in any war. In the end, it doesn’t matter how many resources they have. You have to remember that people in the military have friends and family back home, there would be a lot of internal conflict. Also, If we leave the people defenseless, we’ll end up just like China and Russia.

        • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          They are defending themselves for having a gun, probably because the feel guilty for having one at their core or feel like others will judge them for it

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            or feel like others will judge them for it

            I can’t imagine why they would feel that way after reading

            gun people are the biggest bunch of frail cunts on this planet

            • Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah I think there is a bit of a disconnect with gun people. Some people are purely about self defense, some people are just genuine enthusiasts, and then there is the group of people who like to pretend they are part of the first two groups but really seem to have a lust for blood - be it fear (someone rings the door bell, or mistakenly drives down the driveway), perceived persecution, political ideology or just downright racist shit.

              Antigun people seem to think everyone who likes guns is part of the last crazy group. It’s a bit hard to really tell who is who sometimes, but it’s definitely impossible to keep the guns out of the crazies hands.

  • chetradley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Having a gun for self defense fucks with your head. When my wife and I lived in a relatively rural area, I used to keep a shotgun under our bed for protection, but I eventually got rid of it. Never shot it a single time, but you’d better believe every time I cleaned it or moved it or just remembered I had it, I was imagining the horrible situation I might be forced to use it in. That shit low key fucked me up. Strange sound in the middle of the night? Better grab the gun.

    I can’t even begin to imagine carrying one on me, especially in public. I like to think I have a pretty level head, but some people are just waiting for you to look at them the wrong way so they finally have that moment. So frightened or psychotic or some combination of the two that their first instinct is to just start shooting. Hell, my wife’s cousin-in-law got in a fucking shootout when he cut someone off in traffic.

    Used to be very pro responsible gun ownership, but lately I’m thinking that level of responsibility is far too rare in people.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I want some sort of driving test for guns. If you fail it, no guns for you. Have to retake it every 5-10 years and it’s pretty easy to pass if you aren’t a moron.

      I’ve seen literally the dumbest shit on ranges. People flagging one another. Accidental discharges a few feet from one’s foot, flagrantly breaking the range rules while the range instructor literally just finished explaining the rules to everyone there.

      Christ, one time (in a rural state) someone didn’t want to give up their CC to run a combat-style range. It was for safety, in case they ate shit on the course. They said they needed their CC in case there was a “terrorist attack”. I looked around the bumfuck, empty desert we were in and wondered where the terrorists would even come from, lmao.

      • chetradley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Hard agree on the gun safety test. Buying a gun, especially in the US, is way too easy and the number of people walking around strapped with absolutely no knowledge of gun safety, let alone armed self defense training, is terrifying.

        My wife’s family leans very hard into the guns, god and Trump right wing. My father in law set up a shooting range on his property, and it’s a tradition for the cousins to get together and show off their arsenal. I keep a pistol there because it’s a hellava range gun and the 22LR rounds are dirt cheap, but you can imagine the shit I catch in a family where 9mm is considered a “pussy round”.

        The amount of stupid shit I’ve seen on this range would boggle your mind, and I feel a deep responsibility to make sure nobody dies while I’m there. I’ve seen people walk in front of the range with earmuffs on while someone was getting ready to shoot. I had to stop my father in law from breaking his thumb trying to shoot a Glock with his thumb resting right on the slide. I watched my uncle-in-law (a Republican state senator, mind you) hand a loaded AR-15 to his ten year old son, then just walk away.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Wish I hadn’t read this headline, it validates the anxiety I’ve had before about being confronted for turning around in a stranger’s driveway.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Dude, people get unreasonably pissy about that. I don’t know why. For instance, there are several houses around here with big “No U Turns In Driveway!” or similar signage to the same effect, which all have like 4 foot long driveways in locations where I can’t imagine anyone would be looking for a spot to turn around anyway.

      Motherfuckers must be paranoid. It’s got to be exhausting, being so spooked all the time.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There is some legitimate reasons for it, but not likely to ever be the case. Larger vehicles may damage their driveway if it’s older or not as well built. So it works for their sedan, but an f-150 or a EV could irreparably damage it. People wouldn’t ever think of that, it’s like driving on their grass basically. Who does that?

        It’s their private property, they do have a right to protect from damage from people entering it, but not to death.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Protect as in “put up a sign”, sure. But I can’t justify any amount of force to protect someone’s driveway.

          If your driveway is damaged by using it as a driveway, then it’s already too late and you need a new one. You have no control over what delivery people are driving, or any number or legitimate public service workers who might need to stop at your house.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            No delivery driver pulls up on driveways anywhere I have been, and you can request them not too as well. Lots will damage driveways due their weight (see below), so policy is to avoid for liability reasons.

            And same as above for public service workers as well, you can request stuff too.

            And that’s actually not true, lots of driveways aren’t able to handle EV weight, the standard 3.5-4” isn’t strong enough. It’ll damage very quickly. It’s not brought up enough to be honest.

    • ZeroCool@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yeah, that’s how prison works. Most people consider it a small price to pay to keep murderers off the streets.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Like good healthcare. Even good prison food is cheaper due to economies of scale.

        We could feed way more homeless with some properly consolidated soup kitchens attached to gov bed-spaces.

      • morphballganon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Release all the inmates that are there on nonviolent drug crimes, so the cost of prisons goes way down?

        But that’s too hard of course.

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Ok. What does that have to do with this murder case?

          Edit: Since you’re so fond of identifying things (even though you have yet to get one right) your answer there was a non sequitur.

          • morphballganon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            25 year sentences would not even be considered if rehabilitation was the intention. It is a sign of a sick system when we applaud 25 year sentences. The guy is not going to get better help for his mental illness after year 24 than he will get in the first year.

              • morphballganon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Why is this thread so full of projection? Why do the people here find it so hard to accept that our prison system is broken?

                • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  You really don’t know what that word means, but dagnabbit you’re not going to let that stop you from using it.

                  I’ll make it simple. What do you think is an appropriate response to 2nd degree murder?