• Garbanzo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          When you start advocating for a particular group to not reproduce, what else would you call it? You can choose that for yourself but if you suggest it for anyone else you’re gonna need to choose your words very carefully to avoid coming across like a super racist from the 19th century.

          • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            To be clear, I’m anti-capitalist and not blaming poor people for anything, nor suggesting they should not have any children. But I stand by my position and wording.

            Don’t have more children (or even pets) than one can support. It’s objectively cruel.

            Would I prefer a world where there wasn’t such dramatic (or ideally any) inequality? Definitely. But even in a world where every single parent could support 6 kids I’d be against people having 17.

            • Rooskie91@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You seem to think that the only way for people with children to to be poor is if they are poor and have children. You know you can have children, loose your job, and become poor, right? I’m telling you, you are out of touch and that is clearly evident in you’re inability to come up with non circumstancial examples.

    • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m just saying good parents consider what is best for their children before having them. Having 6 when you can only reasonable support 3 is a ‘poor’ choice. Bad parents, on the other hand, have children to benefit themselves rather than the child.

      And anyway, statistically, lower income people have more children per person so no one is preventing poor people from having kids. I’m just questioning if that is what is best for those children, because I care about children’s suffering.

      • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In my experience, bad parents are those that think people act with a single motive - they tend to label kids as manipulative. People can have kids for a selfish reason and still put their interests first.

      • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As if it’s never the case that people have children in the expectation that their current financial situation won’t suddenly take a turn for the worse; as if what made perfect sense 10 years ago doesn’t make sense now when you have a 10-year-old kid to support.

        This idea of yours, that people should somehow be able to magically predict their financial future is pure bullshit.