• RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That would be a pretty big list of people at this point. I don’t think it would even be possible to charge all of them. It’s just unrealistic especially since it’s legal in the state. Possible but unlikely.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It could be used to target-prosecute political enemies and “unpopular elements” like police/climate protestors.

      Really we just need federal legalization.

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You say that, but historically cannabis related charges in particular have been used to target specific parts of the population and individuals. It’s the sort of thing that could be exploited nefariously at a convenient moment. Perhaps I’m reading too much in to it.

    • blockhouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agree. Which is why if the federal government decides to put a clamp down on cannabis use, they’re not going to prosecute thousands of users. Prosecuting three or four card payment processing companies and the banks they do business with would have an icy cold chilling effect and bring the industry’s cash flows to a dead stop.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree. The federal government has shown every willingness to go after all of us. Imagine a 1000 dollar fine for every pot transaction. You can fight it if you want but that would risk criminal charges. So you take the plea deal.