Player2@sopuli.xyz to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 months agoLand (r)u(le)sesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down10
arrow-up119arrow-down1imageLand (r)u(le)sesopuli.xyzPlayer2@sopuli.xyz to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 months agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squaredoctorcrimson@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months agoMost of Montana, 62% officially, is fields so that seems really inaccurate
minus-squarePlayer2@sopuli.xyzOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months agoThe position on the diagram is arbitrary, it just shows the proportion of land use type
minus-squarelemillionsocks@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoAh that makes a lot of sense. I was wondering how the Adirondacks in NY and northern Vermont are “Urban Commercial housing” and north eastern tip of Ohio is maple syrup.
Most of Montana, 62% officially, is fields so that seems really inaccurate
The position on the diagram is arbitrary, it just shows the proportion of land use type
Ah that makes a lot of sense. I was wondering how the Adirondacks in NY and northern Vermont are “Urban Commercial housing” and north eastern tip of Ohio is maple syrup.