• ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 year ago

    buying a ‘dumb’ tv is getting harder and harder to do…

    how long until you are forced to hook a new ‘smart’ one up to the internet, just to “set it up”–even if you have no plans on ever using the ‘smart’ features or embedded apps?

      • PlungeButter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can choose not to connect a Roku TV to the Internet during the initial setup, and you just get access to live TV and the HDMI inputs with (obviously) no streaming channels or updates. It works fine as a dumb TV.

        And the credit card thing? That’s after you create your account on their website, you can just close the browser window. Or click the button saying “skip” or “later” or whatever it is.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looking forward to the 1 yr free trial of my new TV, before I have to subsribe to Samsung+ for just 15.99 per month to turn it on.

    • PigsInClover@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. You can buy the displays that are marketed to businesses and usually come without all of the invasive smart features.

      They definitely cost more on average, but they’re also built to run more often or constantly, and hold up far better. They’re even a lot more customizable.

      You can buy some that come with slots where you put in a raspberry pi or another computer of your choice, instead of whatever OS that comes with smart tvs.

      At this point, I’m starting to regularly check if there are “for business customers” options available when I need something, because the options for regular consumers are getting so bad with all this data hoarding and ad pushing.

    • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you buy a Sony Bravia you can put them into “pro mode” which keeps all the signal processing, but lets you turn off android.

      • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s the point they are making. Currently that’s possible. But what is stopping the producers to force you to hook it up to the internet?

        • coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          O… damn.

          Not buying the tv might work… at mass. Like everyone. Please people, vote with your wallet/privacy.

          • ares35@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            roku because you ‘need’ an account to use (try here for one without a payment method requirement).

            vizio must be a new thing for the current models. mine (bought last year, and was “last year’s” model then) didn’t need a net connection to set up for using as a ‘monitor’.

    • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t figure out why the cheap TCL I bought 5 years ago isn’t packed with ads. Maybe because it’s Roku-based?

        • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Disturbing; thanks for sharing that. Seems like the Roku flavor may be okay-ish, but I just walled it off from rest of home network anyway.

          • Adramis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, TCL was the front-runner when I was looking for a non-smart TV until I saw that. :( I ended up just going with a samsung and hoping for the best. I’ve not noticed anything annoying, but we’re probably going to switch back to a PC hooked up to the TV with all the subscription problems / price jacking lately.

            • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Functionally, it’s proven to be a really great TV, particularly at the price point. At most, only one ad in the interface, and it’s for a movie typically.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not always an option. You’d need to dim the lights every time and - most importantly - have a whole spare wall in your home.

        • Zeoic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Im sure you could mount a rollup projector screen anywhere you would put your TV, but your first point is huge. The light issue is a huge non starter

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Two of our TVs hang from the arms in the corners and one occupies a bookshelf. I am not sure it would work that well with a screen that’s less than a meter wide.

      • pirat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve tried getting a way too cheap, really bad projector running Android to work once. From Wish or something, I guess. It was a truly unpleasant experience. Fortunately, it wasn’t mine!

        Also, I had a good ol’ dumb Epson projector 10-15 years ago, but it had a very noisy fan, meaning you had to always turn up your HiFi to try and camouflage the fan noise in louder sound than you else would’ve had. Are low-end consumer projectors still that noisy?