• phx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    100%. X is a hate-filled propaganda machine owned by an asshole in the Trump inner circle and hostile to Canada. Fuck it. Fuck Insta too. And Facebook, though we need alternatives to marketplace since it killed many of those (Kijiji isn’t a good alternative either). Fuck Fox News big-time, and PostMedia

    I wonder if we could built a Marketplace alternative tied to the Fediverse

  • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    I Just did a Thing

    I just started a whole thing, issuing official complaints with the RCMP, CSIS, CSE, The Inspector General, and few other agencies that I cannot think of right now I sent an email to every MP, and several news outlets.

    The letter is get off of X because we are at war with the US, trade war but war non the less. The lettered agencies are because one of them uses X and the other two should be looking at espionage and foreign interference.

    The Media is included, to try and push it a bit further faster. If Canadian media and officials can leave X, that is a big F you to Musk and a retaliatory measure protecting Canadian interests. I really hope something can be done to protect us, and that other countries will follow suit

    • sunfur82@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Good work. And I agree that the media is included, and it should be highlighted and made more public just how many news outlets are controlled by US companies. I honestly don’t think a lot of the general public are aware of how much control the US has over many of our new outlets. Maybe people might have suspected it before, but not cared, but I think they’d care more now, given the US’s recent actions, and share that with the people around them.

  • reidand@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    X is now the mouthpiece of a Fascist government hell bent on destroying us we need to purge them. We have seen the damage unrestrained propaganda can cause when amplified from X. We are force feeding a generation non-stop harmful propaganda and wondering why they are angry and disenfranchised.

  • witnessbolt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    My friends, you need to know Facebook is a threat, too

    Peter Thiel was the first outside investor in FB. Zuck is close to the tech bros like Musk behind the scenes. You cannot trust either platform

    I obv can’t tell you to ban them, but you need to figure out how to deal with the vast amount of lies and propaganda on them. If they coup-de-grace the US, they will destabilize every democracy. It’s Thiel’s (and Putin’s, for dif reasons) wet dream

  • ninthant@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because of the network effect, without a ban it’s extremely difficult to unseat an incumbent in the social media space.

    Banning X and other American social media would drive Canadians to other platforms and help them thrive.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think it might be a bit short sighted to ban it without thinking about who the incumbent is. I would suspect at this point it’s blue sky but it is hard to say.

  • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    hey, speaking as someone whose democracy was absolutely murdered in silicon valley:

    ban conservative and algorithm driven profit-motivated media, social and otherwise. this may include youtube. ban large language models and their outputs. this is the chief tool of fascists used to create their propaganda and murder the concept of truth. make your (great?) grandfather proud; kill some fucking nazis wherever they poke their vile heads up.

    I genuinely believe that if we had done this, we would be… still fucked, but fucked by neoliberals, who leave a wad of cash on the bed rather than stabbing us so they can cum. please don’t repeat our mistakes. maybe also fortify your southern border. sorry.

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Write your MPs and MLAs!

    They’re almost all still using twitter/X

    Imagine what xAI is doing at twitter behind closed doors, and imagine what they can do in this current conflict.

    It’s too dangerous to let them have power.

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      In my letter to the Saskatchewan legislature today, I said this:

      Publishing such an idea on X, a platform known to harbor extremist views, is not only irresponsible but also potentially dangerous. It sends the wrong message and could be interpreted in the worst possible way.

      I am not accusing Moe or the Saskatchewan Party of anything malicious, but this carelessness demonstrates yet again how unfit Moe is to lead.

      Moe had posted something on X that could be taken the wrong way by smart people or people of Eastern religious faiths so I called him out. I have also asked for all the MLA’s plans to get off of X and US social networks to move to decentralized social networks on Canadian servers. I may get a letter from the DUI hire, because he is the premier but it will say he will say he is doing nothing. I would hope I get some letters from the NDP in Saskatchewan with a plan but I am really not holding my breath.

  • TheObviousSolution@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    The fact is, banning X is free political points. The moment a country does it, it will domino into other countries doing it as well, and they will be seen as having been the leader and first of the movement. They should make sure users know of the federated alternatives before they do so, though.

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have asked the Beaverton to do it, if that counts! I have asked reporters at publications to do it, maybe I will write up a better letter and explain to the media about it.

      I have demanded that the Saskatchewan MLA’s do it, and tell me how they are doing it.

      Further, I need to hear from each MLA on how they plan to remove themselves from U.S.-based social networks and transition to Canadian-hosted, decentralized platforms.

      I do not expect to hear from any MLA, maybe I will get a letter from Moe saying why he is not doing so. It would be nice to hear from the NDP saying they are doing something.

  • Dtules@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    We need tech regulation.

    Here’s a great interview that explains why:

    https://youtu.be/jsHoX9ZpA_M

    In short, in order for democracy to work, we need shared trust. To have shared trust, we need a common basis of reality.

    Our current unregulated informational landscape fragments reality and polarizes people because it is the most profitable thing to do, but it is death to a functioning society.

  • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m being that annoying guy telling all my close friends and family how I feel so much better on Masto and Pixelfed than the FB and IG accounts I deleted. Can’t hope for much but I do enjoy not seeing ads and I’m generally less annoyed in my day.

  • LostWon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Under normal circumstances I wouldn’t agree with such a move, but X is an exception. We’ve seen the platform owner directly interfere with politics in multiple countries and we know what crowd of terrorists he’s been running with both on his platform and elsewhere. The platform owner is definitively a traitor to Canada, aiding a malicious enemy who has threatened our country and set out to harm us. But I do wonder what reaction the average Canadian (who just uses the most popular social media because everybody else is on it and hasn’t participated at all in alternatives like the Fediverse) would have. If we manage to elect a non-CPC gov’t though, maybe they can use that mandate.

  • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The copypasta I’ve been tweaking since this topic keeps coming up. Yeah I know, it mentions Lemmy, and we’re already here, but it’s the prepared Copypasta and talking about it now instead of scrolling through and editing is easier.


    Consider making an account on a Canadian Mastodon instance. Mastodon is a decentralized open-source social media platform similar to X/Twitter. There are several Canadian based general interest “instances” where you can make an account: Mstdn.ca, TheCanadian.Social, CoSocial.ca or SocialBC.ca.

    There is no one company fine-tuning an algorithm to entertain you, sell you crypto, and radicalise you, so you’ll need to do some work on setting up your feed. Check out Fedi.Directory, Interesting Accounts to Follow on Mastodon and the Fediverse and Fedi.Tips- An Unofficial Guide to Mastodon and the Fediverse.

    For some Canadian themed news sources, I recommend the following Mastodon follows:

    Following #Hashtags is also a good way to stay in the loop on a topic. For now, I’d suggest #Canada and #CdnPoli .

    There are also Canadian instances and other Federated services, but Mastodon is probably a good gateway. If you would like to explore the Canadian Fediverse further, join the discussion over at Lemmy.ca or Sh.itJust.Works (kind of like Reddit) or check out the scenery at Pixelfed.ca (kind of like Instagram).

    Even if it isn’t your primary social media, at least you’ll have a backstop of news and a way to connect without the algorithms manipulating what to show you. Hope to see you out there.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Canada should not ban individual social media services one at a time. It can’t be justified, constitutionally or morally. Canada should instead pass a privacy law that prohibits the surveillance capitalist dirty tricks that make them profitable, and design regulations that require interoperability.

    Of course that would require a government capable of designing good tech regulation, which we don’t seem to have much chance of seeing around here any time soon.

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      We are currently at war with the owner of the website. We have justification for banning something that can be used against us in that war.

      It would be like continuing to use American Air defense systems against the Americans in a full scale war.

      While I agree we just need better legislation overall, I also think banning specific American social media is a smart move for everyone involved considering they are all in Trumps pocket.

      We shouldn’t be using products and services of hostile foreign nations. This isn’t a freedumb or mahrights thing.

        • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          We shouldn’t be using products and services of hostile foreign nations. This isn’t a freedumb or mahrights thing.

          Don’t ask questions already answered. It makes you look bad.

        • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          We banned RT from cable. A bit different mind.

          I agree though, just tighten up privacy and reduce the ability to manipulate.

          • kbal@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah I haven’t watched much TV since twenty years ago, forgot for a moment how tightly regulated broadcasting is. By contrast, nobody has even talked about banning the RT web site. For the most part, banning the use of foreign websites is something only autocratic censorship-heavy states are in the business of doing. Canada’s one attempt to block some random for-profit pirate streaming site that almost nobody had heard of was dangerous enough.

  • Suzune@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m against banning things. It’s better to teach users how not to use these platforms.

    It’s more effective, because it has a long term effect.

    I like the Danish idea to label EU products in supermarkets. Information is a good first step.

    • Yoga@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      “Education” doesn’t really feel like a solution to things that people often lean into cognitive dissonance on.

      Everybody has the opportunity to know how reprehensible the conditions the meat that ends up in supermarkets (and probably your local market too) is but very few people are willing to change their diets. Many people talk about caring about ‘loving animals’ but when it comes down to making changes, the head just usually goes into the sand.

      Kurzgesagt did a good video recently on what the cost to improve animal welfare for things that end up on peoples plates would be but the truth is the only reason why we know what those numbers are is because some places have banned certain practices. The only way to realize those benefits is through legal changes, not 3% of people paying 3 times as much for fancy free range eggs.

      That said, I’m also generally against banning things, I just don’t know how you make that sort of thing less attractive- a Twitter Tax?

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I am in favor of banning X because it’s run by someone who has threatened our sovereignty and, to be honest, a lot of people are pretty fucking dumb.

      • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        What about TikTok, Facebook or Reddit? One is operated by an adversarial government, one harbors and aids scammers to steal millions, and Reddit is 4chan light.

        Banning platforms is not the answer, it opens the door to banning as an easy solution to any issue.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t advocate for banning any of those platforms (though I think Meta should be broken up due to being a monopoly) because they’re not literal mouthpieces for one dude. X is essentially now Elon’s blog and he has illegally interfered with the US election and is trying the same with other countries.

          I guess, as an alternative to banning X, I’d settle for it being forced to be sold to someone else or just Elon Musk leaving the picture entirely.

          He is the problem. He has too much influence and power.

          • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            He is a problem but people who vote based on what they read on Twitter were already going to be a wasted vote. Education at an early age on how to think critically, ask questions and find answers is how you mitigate this kind of crap.

            • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              So these people who education has already failed… is it helpful and healthy to expose them to the raw bullshit of a staunchly eugenicist nazi? Should we buy them all copies of mein kampf because it couldn’t do any more harm?

              I agree that the right long term solution education…

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      America is the best example that you just can’t teach some people. Doesn’t matter if it is scientists and doctors doing the teaching. If anything in the eyes of idiots that makes them even less credible. Don’t underestimate stupidity.

      • Suzune@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I honestly know what you mean. But I have my principles. It’s not good to use censorship to fight disinformation. It’s a social problem and it’s better to fight the root cause, not the symptoms.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      maybe instead, pass a law. one with substantial penalties for failure to comply, that requires ‘social media companies’ of a ‘certain size’ to do (reasonable) ‘things’ in order to operate or make themselves available in canada. things that spaceman fireball would never do

      • ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        He’s the richest man in the world. You couldn’t set a fine he wouldn’t just pay as the cost of doing business.

    • Two2Tango@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I get updates on X from my local news and police stations about traffic, weather, etc. We’d need to get this type of stuff into another single platform before many people would switch.

      • burghler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        How will they switch if they’re already consolidated where they are? People are employed to manage these accounts, it’ll just be their responsibility to migrate to the new platform.

        • Two2Tango@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s the problem, we need a platform that’s popular enough to catch their attention/make it worth the effort to post twice - which is half the reason anyone is still using Twitter. Trust me, I’m no fan of it and I avoid the comment section like the plague :/

      • stardust@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you have to use Twitter I recommend using squawker if you have android. Unfollow everyone from Twitter just use squawker to subscribe to accounts which provides a subscription feed that is local without adding the account followers.

        Not a good idea to use the official Twitter app anyways with all the data collecting it can do and adding to follower counts adds added pressure to keep a presence there. Just turn into a ghost when it comes to Twitter usage.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Except that it doesn’t work. The most effective way to shut down a movement is to prevent it from existing in the first place, not to reeducate millions.

      • Suzune@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Every time some entity introduces censorship-like measures, the internet gets slightly worse. And I mean it from a technological perspective.

        I don’t like to lose good things, just because there are some morons out there.

        If you can navigate masses towards X, you can also do it in the opposite direction.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          So where do you draw the line then?

          Can’t ban websites selling drugs or with CSAM, just in case?

              • Suzune@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                It’s more ridiculous to believe that fighting crime is confiscating cars, block websites or similar things without catching the ones who cause the crimes.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      +1.

      This just suggests to censor us. I’m all for an open and free internet. If you censor it, you look ight as well join the book burning club.

      Education is key. Just look at what they doing in the United St… Oh wait, nevermind.

    • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’m against banning things. It’s better to teach users how not to use these platforms.

      Just because there’s deeper root causes, doesn’t mean the end result shouldn’t be banned if its immoral or destructive. In particular, we figure out what parts of it are problematic enough to be worth banning, and ban those: I.E. the heavily biased algorithm which users have no control over.

      Aside from that, theres also the option of providing alternatives. Said alternatives don’t even have to be publicly run. It could come in the form of something like a one-time grant to Mastrodon and opening up a server exclusively for government departments to share announcements or PR with the public.

  • Devanismyname@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ban all social media honestly. There isn’t really even one platform that isn’t used to manipulate us in some way.