• pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    I went to a board game convention a month ago, it was the first time I’ve girlmoded for something major. They put their own signs over the bathroom signs explaining that both were gender neutral and the only difference was urinals vs stalls. That made it soooo much easier on me and I was very glad

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      23 days ago

      Indeed, I’m a furry and a few conventions I go to, even in red states, have temporary rebranding of the bathrooms to gender neutral for the duration of the convention as a requirement that the Hotel must maintain in order to keep the convention’s business.

      And since furries are either suspiciously wealthy or poor, but dedicated, it’s a wise economic decision for said Hotel.

    • horse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      23 days ago

      I don’t think only gender neutral bathrooms is the way to go. There should be an all gender bathroom and a woman’s bathroom. Unfortunately we live in a world where women may still feel understandably uncomfortable with men in the bathroom with them.

      Note: To be clear I’m not saying the women’s bathroom should be for cis women only, it should only exclude men.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Gendered bathrooms should not need to exist because bathrooms should have some dammed privacy.

    In the US, there’s a door for boys and one for girls. Behind each is a giant room with some sinks and some toilets that may as well be using cardboard and tinfoil for privacy.

    Go somewhere more pleasant like Sweden? You have a short hallway with 3 or 4 doors on each side, and behind each is a small restroom including a sink and a mirror.

    Every real and maga-hallucinated bathroom problem largely solved.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    23 days ago

    The fact that stalls exist kinda makes me question why, outside of poorly aged “values” we even have gendered restrooms.

  • Midnitte@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    Imagine the amount of small businesses that would be put under if they had to pay for vastly more bathrooms because someone can’t be creepy.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      Imagine thinking that most businesses don’t just have one gender neutral *toilet

      It’s not a bathroom, or a restroom

      You’re not taking a bath or having a kip, it’s a fucking toilet you prudes 😂

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    23 days ago

    I wish reviews used a “web of trust” so I could discard votes by Anders Holmvik and anyone who agrees with him frequently.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        22 days ago

        I can understand how “get rid of gender neutral bathrooms” is though-provoking intellectual discussion to you, but I’ve already considered that reactionary perspective enough to reject it.

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          I was making a joke about the broader concept. I think all bathrooms should be gender neutral.

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            But the broader concept is nonsensical. Filtering out idiots (glad you were joking!) who spam bad ideas isn’t creating an echo chamber. You’d spend all day listening to whoever is loudest.

  • Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Overhyped. i don’t like the comment above. they make it seem like a big thing. i don like these kinds of posts…

    when a post has “absolute legend” as the title, that reads to me like a youtube title like “We DESTROYED <popular thing> FOREVER!” or “This EASY trick is a GAME CHANGER”. gooooddddd (im in complain mode now sorrii)

        • Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          *nununununu!!!* please understand that I’m angry at the reddit post with the annoying youtube title, not the repost here on Lemmy. On thus post, “No” is a pretty good title I think. it’s not overselling it, it makes sense within the context of the funi and it’s not an overused buzzword.

          the REDDIT POST on the other hand! it goes out of it’s way to be annoying. it repeats the the same meaning using different words. it pretends like this is a big thing: some employee replying with no to some comment about thir game. It’s boring, overblown and who cares. It would have been funier if the reddit person just reposted the post and didnot add a dum and long subtitle to it. WHAT IS THIS? prepare for my next game, named Calm Compass: A side adventure in a parallel dimebsion. (very out of context, yes, srryy)

          have I now become the one to overblow and overreact? am I now saying the same thing with many words? YES! ON PURPOSE!

          im sori next time I will ramble shorter.

          Also

          Alright, that’s gonna be it for this round of Smorty COMPLAINS about your somewhat well known topics! Tune in next episode, where I discuss, that AI is actually BAD for the internet and that it is RUINING the internet and that AI features are BAD and that OpenAI is now putting its LLMs into MURDER DRONES (not a joke btw) and that GOOGLE SEARCH RESULTS ARE USELESS NOW BECAUSE IF AI!!!<|endoftext|>

  • Ghost (he/any)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    22 days ago

    Beyond gender, as a father of two girls, i fucking love gender neutral bathrooms. Your establishment has gn bathrooms you’ve doubled the odds of me returning.

    • breakcore@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      23 days ago

      Anders Holmvik is one of the three main characters in the show Workaholics.

      The character is played by actor and co-creator of the show Anders Holm.

      Vik or vig, in Scandinavian languages, means inlet or bay and is rather common as part of a placename. Therefore also somewhat common as a family name, since these tend to reflect origin of a given family.

      I can recommend the show, it is funny, albeit rather stupid.