• HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I don’t use google stuff rn so…

    Not even Google maps since I had an ad placed in my route so it clicked the ad while I was selecting which route to take. Bu bye

  • bitcrafter@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    12 days ago

    What’s scary is all of the ways they can track you even without your browser actively cooperating. For example, they can create an HTML5 canvas, render a bunch of shapes, and then probe individual pixels to get a read on your graphics card and drivers. The EFF has a very educational test you can subject your browser to in order to see how easy it is to fingerprint it based on these kinds of things.

    • const_void@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Use alternative browsers (Safari, Firefox) and alternative platforms (iOS, GrapheneOS).

      • The Doctor@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Thing is, then you stand out as one of the very few people using that alternative.

      • Holler Pixie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        I’ve had some internal struggles on this. Have used graphene for a long time and the last phone completely avoided using any G products (not even sandboxed) but still worry about the hardware, especially with the new AI chips. Can’t imagine that the ability to fingerprint using their hardware isn’t available.

        So I vacillate between Fairphone/PinePhone with Linux or just anonymity through the masses with iOS. It sucks, the whole turn. Either get a fully functional smartphone and pick your poison or use a limited or dumb phone but know your smart TV/car/computer/etc will still be there for vulnerability.

    • flatbield@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 days ago

      Not sure there is. Dimensionality of the trackble elements is very high. All of them have to either be the same or fuzzed across large groups of users.

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        it can be fixed but would require herculean engineering efforts, the biggest problem atm is the canvas. most of the other things can be fixed via defaults that are returned to the webapps unless explicit permission to access them is granted. like there is never a reason to return errors for session storage if its disable. just return a memory implementation that doesn’t persist beyond the window life. little changes like that would go a long way to removing the bits of information.

    • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Use browsers like Cromite, Iridium, Waterfox, Betterfox, Firedragon, Tor, Vanadium. Disabke fingerprinting in hidden settings or in about:config. Don’t install too much extensions, if you can, none. That can be used to fingerprint you. If you don’t have the need, disable javascript and webassembly. Change your useragent to something very common

  • yoshisaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m on grapheneOS using Ironfox (fork of Mull because it’s been killed off), I should be safe, right?

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I strongly recommended installing EFF’s Privacy Badger on your and your relatives browsers.

    This stops many trackers, and causes less side effects and less breakages than most filters (unlock et all).

    • RiQuY@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      If you have uBlock Origin then Privacy Badger is redundant. Also, more extensions = easier fingerprinting.

      • Hirom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Privacy Badger focus on blocking trackers. uBlock origin blocks all kind of things Ads,Trackers,etc and so it have a higher risk of breaking sites.

        Yes, they’re mostly redundant. Happy uBlock Origin users should probably keep using just uBlock. People who don’t use uBlock to avoid breaking websites, or just want to block trackers, should use Privacy Badger.

    • rickywithanm@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      Another option if you wish to protect your whole network is to set up something like pi-hole or AdGuard. I recently set up pi-hole on our network. I’m shocked by the amount of blocked traffic coming from phones and windows machines. Don’t even get me started on the traffic from our smart tv.

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          basically they hijack dns resolution to return does not exist errors when requests are sent to the tracking systems. highly effective, but also many sites are negatively impacted by them because no one codes for failure in the web industry.

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 days ago

              there are well known distribution lists that people add servers to that these things periodically fetch and use to perform the blocking.

  • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    If you are worried about privacy, you shouldn’t use Google anyway. I write this from a deoogled android custom rom