Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoImplicit bias ruleslrpnk.netimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1775arrow-down18
arrow-up1767arrow-down1imageImplicit bias ruleslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-squareBmeBenji@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 months agoIt does kind of sound cool but I thought the current trend was to move away from needlessly gendered language, especially with how in English a lot of feminine nouns are intentionally made to sound like a diminutive form of the masculine version
minus-squareXyre@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoDefinitely agree with preferring non-gendered language. But it also doesn’t feel like right to default to the (historically) masculine version either.
It does kind of sound cool but I thought the current trend was to move away from needlessly gendered language, especially with how in English a lot of feminine nouns are intentionally made to sound like a diminutive form of the masculine version
Definitely agree with preferring non-gendered language. But it also doesn’t feel like right to default to the (historically) masculine version either.