• morphballganon@mtgzone.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    You are making some logical leaps. Just because certain rapists like alcohol does not mean everyone who likes alcohol is a rapist.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never said so, but when you’re in an isolated community and you know X causes major issues for a minority you adapt to the weakest links in the chain if X is non essential. Like alcohol.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          How many rape victims are enough to take the easiest preventive measures?

          All drunk people don’t cause trouble, all people who cause trouble are drunk… What’s the next step then?

          • bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I was just asking if you knew the magnitude of the situation.

            all people who cause trouble are drunk

            Is this true? And if so, how many?

            How many rape victims are enough to take the easiest preventive measures?

            Well, if one drunk person out of 100 engages in rape once, do you think that’s reason enough to ban alcohol for the other 99?

            If 10 sober people do it, should we ban sobriety?

            That’s why I’m asking you if you know the magnitude of the situation. If you don’t that’s okay. Just say you don’t know the answer and move on.