• Bo7a@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    ideas that are objectively similar to maga bullshit.

      • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        You are cute. How far into the shit-filled rabbithole do I have to go into libertarianism before I find your specific flavour of bullshit? Somewhere between rand paul and ayn rand? Or do we go deeper?

        Libertarians man. What a fucking joke.

        • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m ethically closer to a leftist, but your choices highlight your ignorance but I guess that makes it easier to be smarmy.

          • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            A leftist who can’t see how the tea party emboldened and created the proto-maga movement just in time for Trump to take it over.

            I will once again call bullshit.

            • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              4 months ago

              A leftist who watched the tea party get taken over by republicans. It was an unmitigated disaster, and the libertarians that allowed that shit are mostly gone.

              It is an amusing conundrum, though. Any popular libertarian movement is destined to be co-opted by larger groups if it’s not closely guarded, and libertarians suck at being exclusive to ideas.

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Any popular libertarian movement is destined to be co-opted by larger groups if it’s not closely guarded, and libertarians suck at being exclusive to ideas.

                Ya dont say.gif

                Who would’ve thought that “rugged individualism” doesn’t scale well, and that collectivism of any sort in politics (a fucking popularity contest with real world stakes) will obviously trounce individualism politically? /s

                “If not closely guarded”? What does that even look like? A tiny political party destined to get 0.25% of the vote? Politics is a numbers game, it’s not your favorite indie band, or a recipe handed down from your grandma.

                • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Who would’ve thought that “rugged individualism” doesn’t scale well, and that collectivism of any sort in politics (a fucking popularity contest with real world stakes) will obviously trounce individualism politically? /s

                  If you keep repeating standard anti-libertarian talking points instead of actually attempting to understand then, well, I had enough of that on reddit. There’s a difference between political individualism and peeps living in shacks and shitting with bears. After the state convention in 2020 some of the local peeps went downtown to hand out stuff to homeless peeps with Spike Cohen and his wife (who wandered around finding homeless peeps to drag them to the tent to get stuff).

                  I was referring to closely guarding shit online mostly. In real life it’s just kind of absurd. When I saw pro-life shit at a tea party rally I almost vomited. Not much to be done about it. Back in the day we just helped out causes we cared about. Shared our state fair booth with NORML sort of things.

                  We have a system that’s built to crush third parties. Libertarians and greens have to sue states every election for ballot access and their 4-5%.

                  Regardless, it’s a mistake to write off motivated people that will back you up on individual policies. I may disagree with them on a lot of things now, but when we’re doing activist shit it’s fantastic.

                  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    I was referring to closely guarding shit online mostly. In real life it’s just kind of absurd.

                    Ah yes, online, where you can keep everything closely guarded…

                    What are you even talking about? Keeping something “closely guarded” online is perhaps more absurd than trying to do so in real life, where at least the people had to show up physically.