• xor@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    every time i see a “leftist” talk about not voting for biden, and thus supporting trump…

    • abbadon420@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m sorry, it’s probably considered some sort of a smug European truism by now, but I have to say it. There is no left in the US two-party system. It’s right or center-right, that’s the choices you have, a giant douche or a turd sandwich.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        There is but you have to think of each party as having sub-parties within them. There aren’t external coalitions between parties but internal coalitions within the parties.

        So a guy like Bernie Sanders is left, though not technically a Democrat, he caucuses with the Democrats effectively creating a coalition. There are many members within the Democratic Party that are also left wing, and others that are center, and others that could be considered right wing.

        The Republicans are similar, but have an internal coalition with the far right MAGA faction. Which causes them a lot of problems.

        The primary system is effectively a run off system which is used to determine a final two candidates to vote for in the final election. This system is old and has some bizarre traditions and has vulnerabilities to there being a third party spoiling everything.

        Obviously it’s a crusty system that developed without planning, but the the Presidential election it’s not that dissimilar to France’s run-off system, just takes more time. And the legislatures having coalitions between people with different politics happens everywhere, it’s just happening within the parties and requires people to vote in primaries to get more representatives that have similar views to their own to make up a greater percentage of the coalition (which also happens everywhere).

        In fact having coalitions within a party gives people more information when voting. If I’m voting for one of a dozen parties I don’t have a say over how a coalition is formed after an election. Someone declaring which coalition they intend to be a part of before the electorate votes gives the electorate both a say as to which individual they want (via primaries) and which coalition they want (in the general election).

      • sep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Is it really center-right? I think it is more far right and facist extreme right. Atleast when observed from scandinavia

      • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        This isn’t true in a global sense, nor is it true in a practical sense. There is a left in America, but it is tiny and rarely successful. Most liberal democracies are to the right of American Democrats at the global level on most issues. Every country has drifted rightward over the past half century, so the US isn’t unique.

      • It can be both true that there is no true Left with any political power in the US - individual congressional delegates, maybe, but no coalition or party - and still recognize that there remain differences in the parties and differing outcomes from their governance.

        It’s not anything like the Southpark situation; leftists forget so easily what could - and has - been lost under conservative leadership, that would not have been lost if the person who won the popular vote in the past 6 elections. Women would still have protected body autonomy in all states - that loss was a direct consequence of the Trump administration.

    • regul@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      If Biden wanted my vote he could simply stop supporting genocide. Really quite a low bar for him to clear.

      There’s “holding your nose” and there’s voting for someone actively aiding a genocide.

      • This is the stance I really don’t understand. You do know that if Trump wins, even the limp-wristed calls for constraint go away? That Trump will actively encourage and endorse the genocide? That things will get measurably worse for the Palestinians?

        I really do want to understand how people who hold this particular position think not voting for Biden will improve the lot of the Palestinians. Please, enlighten me.

        • regul@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I won’t vote for someone who’s pro genocide. It’s pretty simple.

          People who aid and abet genocide don’t get my vote.

          Biden’s not changing course, so he clearly thinks he can win just with the votes of people who are okay voting for a pro-genocide candidate. That’s his call to make.

          • Sorry for the delayed response.

            This year, it’s a choice between a person who’s funding a genocide while applying (admittedly limited) political pressure to restrain Israel, and a person who’s publically stated that he supports the genocide and thinks it isn’t going fast enough, and who would increase funding to increase the speed of the genocide.

            By not voting for the former, you are implicitly endorsing the latter (saying, he’s just as hood as the former), and are culpable if he is elected - the definition of moral evil includes inaction. Sitting this one out because you like neither candidate is a moral evil, since one candidate is categorically worse (genocide-wise) than the other.

            • regul@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Biden has agency here. He could very easily get my vote, but chooses not to. He’s making conscious decisions with expectations to how people will receive them. That leaves us with two possibilities, which I alluded to earlier:

              1. He cares more about genocide than winning the election.
              2. He thinks he can win without the anti-genocide vote.

              If it’s 1, I don’t want him as my president. If it’s 2, he’s not expecting my vote and nor shall he get it.

      • xor@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        there’s “administration aiding a genocide, but also doing so because they’re being lied to by israel, who also has a massive propaganda campaign to manipulate americans into supporting them…”

        versus

        Project 2025 and their plans of a fascist dictatorship right here, complete with a genocide of trans people and hispanics… and muslims… AND a continuation of supporting israel…
        oh and aiding russians commiting genocide in ukraine.

        bruh

        voting trump in won’t save palestine, and it’ll make it soo so much worse

        • endhits@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Stop acting like Biden is just being lied to by Israel and is some helpless victim. He is absolutely responsible for his continued allowance of the genocide of Palestinians. Hold your politicians to a higher standard.

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            He is responsible, though I don’t expect a different response from the majority of people in Washington. I hope regret about his continued complicity in genocide continues to weigh heavily on his shoulders.

            I believe only 2 points about Palestine in this election:

            1. Trump will be worse for Palestine than Biden.

            2. Biden is likelier to switch positions on Palestine than Trump.

            When I look at everything else Trump endangers on top of Palestine, it’s not even a decision.

        • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          So the CIA, NSA, … are just a bunch of idiots that can’t have info on their own? Then why spend so much money on them?

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        And I’m sure letting trump have an easier time getting elected will make things so much better.

        I would recommend talking to your local representatives about the current situation and how important it is to you and expressing how you may support other people running against them if they don’t support a ceasefire.

        Local elections are really important.

      • jwelch55@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Do you really believe not voting for Biden deceases the likelihood of genocide in Gaza? Because the alternative seems so much worse in every way, both for Gaza and so many other massively important issues

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            And instead, a genocide will still be on, and also more women will go to prison for seeking medical care, and also my LGBT friends will have their rights eroded even more, and also the new president will annoint more christofascist Godkings to the Supreme Court ensuring that any attempt to vote for an actual leftist in the future is impossible, and it’ll be fine, because at least you didn’t vote for the guy that wouldn’t have done all that extra awful shit

            A vote is not an endorsement, stop treating it like it is.

            • regul@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Wow that all sounds awful. Biden should really try to win in order to prevent that.

              I suggest he make himself more appealing by being anti-genocide.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Yeah, he should, and if he doesn’t, you still have to vote for him anyway, because the alternative is necessarily worse.

                It absolutely sucks that Democrats are able to make zero effort and get votes based solely on the fact that they aren’t Republicans, but that’s the way it is. Vote in primaries, fight to make Republicans adopt better policies so that Democrats have to react, and vote blue in November, because the alternative is half the people in the community we’re arguing in going to fucking jail for being trans.

          • mashbooq@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            cool bud, then you’ll get someone who’s pro genocide anyway. what a difference you made.

    • Fish [Indiana]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I live in a red state so it doesn’t make any difference who I vote for. I’m not voting for Biden because I don’t want to support the Democrats and my vote doesn’t matter anyway. If I lived in a state where it mattered then I would probably vote for Biden because he’s not Trump.

      • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Please still vote though! At least rest of the way down the ballot. The more local the office the more weight your vote has. Plus there is legislation to vote on. Sorry if you were already planning to, this was also more for anyone who agreed with the sentiment and will stay home.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Agreed. Local candidates and referendum votes are often more directly impactful to local communities.

          Things like legalization of weed, protection of abortion rights, and ranked choice voting usually show up as referendum votes. And when it comes to how homelessness, police, financial aid, schools, etc. in your area are managed, that’s all local politics.

          • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Exactly!!! Locally they are trying to recall a school board member for basically being liberal. Mask mandates, covid policies, some sort of race related class or club… you know the real egregious stuff. That’s really where conservatives are more active too.

      • xor@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        that’s totally fair…
        depending on how red it is, some states do flip, especially with redistricting…
        ive voted third party in a super blue state before… but against trump, i even swallowed my vomit and voted for hillary

        i have a trans child, and i don’t want them put into a concentration camp for sneezing in a school zone or whatever they’re cooking up in Project 2025…

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    North Korea 2024

    People don’t seem to realize, as it becomes easier to automate and maintain oppressive systems, the more scarce that democracy will be. Ask Russians.

      • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Trying to switch the term Troglodyte with Luddite makes your comment even more ironic. The British government ultimately dispatched 12,000 troops to suppress Luddite activity, and as Lord Byron denounced “I have been in some of the most oppressed provinces of Turkey; but never, under the most despotic of infidel governments, did I behold such squalid wretchedness as I have seen since my return, in the very heart of a Christian country”.

        It isn’t the technology, it’s how it’s used, and authoritarians are being much quicker on the uptake because of the iffiness of democratic infighting that has also been unable to topple, suppress, or even stop the power of authoritarian states from growing.

    • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Authoritarianism is extremely vulnerable to natural disasters, ask Syria. Climate change will ultimately being about the collapse of all authoritarianism because there simply won’t be enough excess to support hierarchy. The question is if we will be smart enough to being about that change before material conditions force it to happen.

  • bouh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    You’re trying to read too much into this.

    When the state doesn’t work for enough people anymore, it collapses into fascism. It always does. Unless it collapses to foreign forces of course.

    Accelerationism at this point is merely an argument for liberals to convince people who are not fascists to support their liberalism as a lesser danger.

    It won’t work. Liberalism will have to do something, not the people who don’t believe the bullshit anymore. And interestingly, throughout history, liberals always choose fascism over anything else that would remove them some power.

    So don’t pretend it’s up to the leftists to choose. You, the liberals, did this to the world. Time to open your eyes.

    Liberalism is responsible for this fascist doom, not the left. That’s not only true for the US. That’s also true for all of Europe. Liberals vanquished the left. Now is the time to fight fascism. That’s what you earned. The left will fight. Will the liberals do it?

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Accelerationism at this point is merely an argument for liberals to convince people who are not fascists to support their liberalism as a lesser danger.

      You make me mad. You make me mad because you’ve deluded yourself into believing fatalistic death cult BS, willing to drag other people down with you. Liberals might be deluded and wrong, but you’re honestly worse. Liberals are more open minded than you, more hopeful than you, and believe in building a popular coalition. I don’t care if you recognize capitalism is bad, you’re not helping anyone do anything about it.

      “Eat shit and die” is what I’m hearing from your empty justifications for inaction. I’ve barely started living my life, and you’re saying “it just needs to end. Sorry. Nothing to be done.” I like my life, unlike you apparently, so I’m going to reject your ideas emphatically.

      Fuck your opinion. Just like fascist dribble, it deserves no respect.

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You don’t understand. I did not deluded myself to anything. I abandoned a system that’s working against so many people.

        The question is not for the left whether to support liberals or fascists. The question is for liberals whether to support socialism or fascism. It’s the people in power who get to choose. And liberals are in power for so many decades that they have no excuse for the shit we’re in now.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          The system is broken, fucked, dysfunction, shitty, and unacceptable. That doesn’t change the fact that it’s better than openly genocidal fascism. I might die under Democrats; I will die under Republicans.

          We inherently lack freedom of choice on most things. You don’t choose the class of your parents. You don’t choose your gender, sex, attraction, neurotypicality, ethnicity, race, culture, or access to learning as a child. You have to play the cards you’re given.

          In a purely descriptive sense, Republican control will result in every bad thing that would happen under Democrats, plus all the promises they’re making about LGBTQ genocide, absurd deregulation, removal of every social program, invading Mexico, targeted prosecution of political threats, and mandatory fascist propaganda in schools. Those are just some of consequences id Republicans win.

          The cost of the 2nd amendment is thousands of deaths from guns every year that wouldn’t have happened without it. 2nd amendment advocates constantly ignore that consequence. If you try to show it to them, they mentally cannot perceive it. They ignore the costs and live in the delusion that they get a free lunch. A lot of conservative logic hinges on ignoring “externalities,” that they don’t personally have to deal with. They love talking about basic economics, but their supposed worldview cannot accept it.

          Even the cynical conservatives are often living a delusion. They recognize the direct pain they cause to poor people, but they fail to recognize the long term cost of their behavior. Encouraging global fascism has the adorable effect of increasing the risk of global conflict. Just as most liberals ignored the fascism that capitalism leads to, fascists ignore the serious war that nationalism leads to.

          Modern war between nations cannot be won by the participants. Liberals aren’t much better on this front, nor are many socialists for that matter. The reality is that we need deescalation or everyone might lose. We don’t just need to not accelerate, we need to slam on the breaks. The odds are stacked against success, but fueling the fire is joining the global death cult that fascists and liberals are unwittingly leading.

          In short, you’re thinking small like humans are designed to do. Humans are dangerous, so not trying to exploit them isn’t just morally right, but prudent.

          • bouh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m not fueling any fire. It’s already burning, and voting for liberals is what fuels the fire.

            You’re talking about US politics. Isn’t the situation dire already? Republican already are indirectly supporting Russian war, fomenting civil war, and destroying people rights. Are you telling me that media are overstating all of this? That the situation is fine actually and it can go like this for many more years yet?

            How did it got better with Biden in 3 and a half year?

            It would have been worst is always the predicament of the liberals. Everything else is worse. There is no alternative. But it’s a dead end. And we’re on the wall already.

            Supporting the liberals is fighting those who want to make a better world. It’s supporting fascism.

            And to get back to the subject : not voting is a right, and it is the only vote that doesn’t support fascism.

              • bouh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                So you’re actually the desperate one if you think that not voting this election is committing suicide.

                • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Yes. I am desperate to live. That’s a virtue, not a vice.

                  At the end of the day, you just have an inaccurate view of reality. You’re motivated by anger to think prolonging liberalism isn’t worth it because it’s a shit worldview that should be destroyed. I agree that it sucks and should be replaced, but I recognize that empowering fascism has no real upside. It doesn’t matter what liberalism “deserves,” as blame is only useful in guiding us to real justice. Mechanically, what is the best strategy for minimizing harm and maximizing well being?

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Another thing : my view is not doomerism. I merely stop to fight for the liberals. Chaos bring opportunities. Liberals are doing everything to keep a status that’s rottening. They are actively supporting fascism to keep the status quo. I’m not sure if they’re blinding themselves into believing that they can keep the fascism away, or if they are actively pushing for it willingly. But it’s happening.

        I’m not saying that all is lost and there’s no hope. I’m saying that helping the liberals today is only helping the fascists tomorrow. Things will get worse. That’s not doomerism, that’s a hard fact. Something must be done now.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sorry, but there aren’t opportunities in chaos. That’s some cringe edgelord larping. There are no opportunities gained in chaos, only death and suffering.

          Honestly, your goofy accelerationism seems more like the cope of someone that’s given up what they see as “the first game.” You think you can come back in the second game and win a best of 3. Again, I’m sorry to disappoint, but there probably won’t be a 2nd game for you unless you’re incredibly lucky.

          I’m not betting on a second chance. There’s no benefit to not trying my hardest on game 1 if won’t do much to improve my chances of making it to game 2. If your strategy is to hide, you’re a privileged coward. Most people won’t have that chance, and betting that you aren’t most people is wistful thinking.

          • bouh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            And what are you doing in this game 1 exactly to succeed? Voting for the lesser evil? Unless something is in the bag for the next term to radically change how it’s going, it’ll only get worse. I don’t see how a liberal will radically change anything.

            This battle is lost already. It was lost when Biden was made the candidate. Now it’s time to prepare for the next battle. Because fighting this one will only make you weaker for the next one.

            • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Fortunately, voting isn’t that much of a burden relatively speaking. It can also be a springboard for popularizing leftist ideas and attitudes. There aren’t significant downsides except leftist pride(which is less than worthless). I’ll vote for that lesser evil AND prepare for a potential disaster because they aren’t mutually exclusive you arrogant block of lead.

              • bouh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Because you don’t see the downside doesn’t mean there aren’t. It’s ironic that you talk about arrogance when you’re so blind, disrespectful and comfident in your opinion.

  • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s necessary to hold two truths: liberalism always leads to fascism and accelerationism does not prevent fascism. So one should both delay the inevitability of fascism by participating in liberal democracy and do everything possible to make liberal democracy unnecessary as quickly as possible before the collapse.

    The thing that can be especially hard for some people to understand is that not everyone experiences fascism at the same time. It’s not a switch. It’s a decline. Some people have been expecting fascism for decades or generations now. So people will be at different places in terms of interacting with the system. We are all trying to survive. We need as much time as possible to build a resistence movement, but, at the same time, no matter what compromises we get via electoralism those can be destroyed instantly if we only rely on the state to protect them.

  • Thrashy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I used to know a poli-sci researcher who was trying to take a big-data look at the success and failure of revolutions, taking in variables like “how many demonstrators rallied against the government?” “How many dissidents were disappeared by internal security forces?” and even things like “how many bullet holes are there on the buildings around the main protest venue in the capital?”

    I asked him once if he’d discovered the secret to a successful revolution, and he just grimaced at me.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I love how people take the Soviet revolution as some sort of example of success, when what actually happened was that the original government collapsed because it was getting the shit kicked out of it by Germany, then a new government took over and got the shit kicked out it of by Germany before also collapsing, then the Bolsheviks strolled into literally empty government buildings and took over - against the judgement of most of the Bolsheviks who still thought the time wasn’t right to take over. Hardly a replicable or generalizable sequence of events.

      • kase@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        American here, asking genuinely: how was the American revolution unsuccessful? My understanding is that the goal was to make the British go away, and that they did accomplish that in the end. What am I missing?

        • Chriswild@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          The goal wasn’t to make the British go away, the goal was to have representation and more than half of the people in the colonies weren’t even for the revolution. This is why they dressed up as natives for the Boston tea party so they could blame that shit on the natives.

          The support of independence wasn’t much till Paul Revere demonized the Boston massacre into being much more villainous than it was.

          The colonies kinda got what they want in revolution with the articles of confederation but with the rise of the federalists the US was created as a V2 of the British empire.

              • dvoraqs@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Most of history is made up of stories.

                We can tell different stories of history and many even conflicting ones can be true, but they don’t all have the same weight in their impact to the course of events.

              • WldFyre@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                The “more villainous” part is odd to me, but the subjective claim that the federalists were just v2.0 of the British empire is strong “don’t tread on me” libertarian vibes ngl

      • Thrashy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        What’s a little Third Reich here or Reign of Terror there between friends, eh? Besides , it’s not like a little bit of anti-intellectual purging or nationwide famine isn’t worth enduring to get to a better world for the people left afterwards!

        • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          re the reign of terror. Extremely bad yes but I think this quote by mark Twain highlights flaws in how we think about this stuff.

          THERE were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.
          

          Mark Twain, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court

          They were trying to throw off a horrifically oppressive system that had been going on centuries. Defs killed too many innocents, defs had problems with paranoia. Also the lesser violence in the struggle between nobles and everyone else.

          The book is awesome btw

  • psmgx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Accelerationism is literally foreign propaganda, and has its roots in a few European leftists that had their views hijacked as a way of pushing radicalisation to status quo liberals.

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s literally nonsense, and the equivalent of Christian Zionism / eschatology in that it’s a set of incredibly harmful, baseless beliefs that advocate for mass misery in the name of vague hope of an accelerated magical delivery of human kind to a new era of happiness and joy.

    • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      “The purpose of our direct action program is to create a situation so crisis packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation.”

      • Martin Luther King Jr., Letter from a Birmingham Jail

      This is pretty straightforwardly an accelerationist tactic. It might not have been called that at the time, but strategically pushing crises over the tipping point, in order to take advantage of their fallout, wasn’t invented by the boogaloo boys in 2017.

          • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            So, you’re saying that anything aside from acquiescence is accelerationism?

            I feel like if MLK Jr had been advocating Wallace for president that might make a little sense. Assembly against the government/institutions is well within the political sphere.

            Martin Luther King Jr wasn’t even opposed to the states monopoly on violence. He was just clever about using that violence against the State. Clever and pretty self sacrificial. There was routine bodily and financial harm performed by the state against African Americans. Manson was trying to promote a race war to overthrow society. MLK was trying to fix society.

            He was a radical, but not an accelerationist.

  • Zummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you ask me, the point isn’t to not vote for Biden, but rather to show him that’s vote for him isn’t automatic just because the opponent is Trump. Maybe if Biden listened when a lot of people said he was too old and lot people said don’t give Israel weapons used to kill women and children he wouldn’t be in this predicament. It’s funny how the leftists in do the same thing they always do that only works for millionaires work and then get mad at the working class when they don’t vote for them.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The point is to vote for him but also maybe not vote for him?

      Doesn’t seem like that’s much of a point to me.

      The US is dabbling with fascism from many different angles. GOP is all about US fascism. The Tankies support foreign fascism that’s in opposition to the US. Rightwing extremists say Biden is far left. Tankies say Biden is right wing.

      Are you so upset over Gaza that you want the same thing to happen to US cities? This is a possible outcome of allowing authoritarians to run your country.

      • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Make your own decision: see the facts not the talk. Biden in Europe is considered full right or at least center-right. And we have fascists all over Europe.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Biden in Europe is considered full right or at least center-right.

          This is talk, not facts. Yes if you’re in a bubble where everyone is talking the same way, it might feel like a fact, but that’s all just talk and feelings. In the end all of politics is just talk despite what the ideologues might tell you.

          • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m telling you, as a Spaniard, that Biden is not left wing. And the same could tell you any French, German or Italian. Except for the far right nuts.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yes, you’re saying your opinions. Are the opinions of Spaniards somehow more relevant than other people’s?

              • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                No. But can give you a different POV. And is one that almost all in Europe share, that US politics range from center right to far right. Even US expats share that POV.

      • Zummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Am I upset that women and children are being murdered? Yes. I guess you’re ssying I’m supposed to be fine with that. Sorry, I can’t be blind to atrocities just because they aren’t happening in my backyard. Seems like you are. You know that you can be against Trump AND murder, right?

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sure it’s fine to be upset, but being upset 100% of the time means you’re vulnerable to emotional manipulation and become disconnected from reality. Trump supporters also have good reason to be upset about current economic conditions, don’t they? But they’re upset at the wrong people because they’re blasted with emotion non-stop and don’t ever think about how things are.

          The political leadership of Hamas are billionaires living in luxury in Qatar while their people die. The local leadership in Gaza living in underground bunkers that keep them safe while the people above them die. They use religion to justify their actions. Like all authoritarian regimes they are very good at propaganda to keep their population in line and to gain support from foreigners.

          This fascist organization launched an attack on October 7, 2023 where they went into villages and murdered women and children. How upset does that make you? Apparently not that much, which is concerning. The goal of this attack was to start the war you’re seeing play out now. During that attack they took hostages to force Israel into a ground campaign. Ground campaigns in a densely populated area is known by everyone to result in the highest amount of civilian casualties. Hamas knew this, it’s what they wanted. Because they can use this to create effective propaganda.

          The emotions you’re feeling is proof of the effectiveness of Hamas’s plan. They made this happen to make you sympathetic to them. And because of how effective this has been they will likely do it it again.

          In a few decades time when this all happens again, you’ll be saying the same things to the younger generation as I’m saying to you now. This cycle won’t end until we have a generation that can see they’re being manipulated. Unfortunately you’re not the generation that will end the cycle of violence. Maybe Generation Z+1 will be the ones that won’t fall for the propaganda. If we survive that long.

          • Zummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Are you seriously trying to say that if people are upset that innocent Palestinians are being murdered, they are being manipulated by Hamas? Dude, I come from a Jewish family. I’m pretty sure Jews know a thing or two about systematic extermination. You’d be the person telling Jews that being upset about concentration camps means they’re playing into political hands. What happened to the Jews at the hands of Hamas is terrible, and I wish it hadn’t happened, but just because innocent Israelis were killed doesn’t mean innocent Palestinians should be killed in retaliation. Even if the goal is get Hamas, you don’t do that by attacking areas where innocents are and where innocents will get killed. And you don’t deprive Palestinians of food and water. I just heard yesterday that Palestinians have been reduced to eating grass because the food they have been eating (that is normally given to animals) has run out.

            Now, there is absolutely no doubt Trump is a terrible person, and I will be voting for Biden, but I can certainly see why people who have seen their ancestors and families die at hands of Israel, would not automatically want to support the man who is continuing to give the money and weapons being used to do that killing. I hope you never have to go through what the Jews and Palestinians have been through, but I also hope you have some perspective in the future.

            I want to be clear that this is a discussion and I am not trying to call you bad person (or anything close to that or of the sort). I just want you and others to understand why people would be hesitant of a Biden vote and why they aren’t supporting Trump just because they are.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Dude are you saying Trump voters don’t act against their own self interest because of propaganda? So why would you think your ethnicity makes you less susceptible to propaganda.

              Your social media is probably full of “news” items telling you to not vote for Biden because he’s an evil demon the same as the MAGA social media feeds. Probably sewing the same distrust of “mainstream media” as their feeds are doing.

              I’ve had discussions with the “genocide joe” types and discussions with the MAGAs. They are the exact same kinds of discussions. Same outrage same distrust of anything that doesn’t fit the narrative. Same ignorance, same disregard for self interest thinking it’s noble act to make things worse.

              Honestly, the Palestinian movement is a violent blood and soil antisemitic movement. They’re good at propaganda because it’s what fascists do. Even Jews fell for this kind of thing the last time it happened. They only hate the Cosmopolitan Zionist Jews, you’ll be ok as long as you go along with them, right?

              When my Grandfather’s generation was done with the country that was spouting this kind of shit last time the cities of that country looked a lot like Gaza does now. They put fascists in power, we all hoped that movement would fizzle out but it didn’t. The world would be better off if Hamas didn’t exist but it got too much outside support to die off on it’s own. Maybe this conflict will at least weaken them enough so their River to the Sea movement will die out. Or maybe it will continue because of outside support. Which case this all happens again in another generation.

              So tell me do you want this to happen again? Support Hamas and it will. So if you support Hamas, and that results in this happening again, who’s the one that’s really promoting genocide? It ain’t “genocide joe” who’s doing everything he can to end it.

              Ah but you’re too upset to even consider how support for a Palestinian movement that has refused to separate itself from Hamas makes you complicit in genocide. That’s an accusation you like to throw at others, and you’re too emotional to consider your own actions. And always the point of fascist propaganda. Too emotional to think about the repercussions of your actions.

              • Zummy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Ok, well, if you think the Palestinians and Jews are to blame for all this, we have nothing else to discuss. I no longer think you want to have legitimate discussion. Personal advice, be less bigoted the next time you want to discuss this.

                • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  What’s bigoted? Thinking that Palestinians are people and are therefore responsible for their actions?

                  And I did mention that Palestinian fascism has a lot of support from the outside. Oil rich assholes, Iran, naive westerners. Lots of outside support which keeps Palestinian leaders corrupt and authoritarian. Which is the major obstacle for Palestinian statehood. Not that most people care about that, it’s only maintaining a righteous anger that matters, right? Hamas might’ve faded from existence if it weren’t for this.

                  See the emotional narratives have gotten you so wound up you don’t have any rational arguments anymore. So just default to calling anyone you disagree a bigot and refuse to think about anything that conflicts with your emotions.