• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The federal term for this is “brandishing” and while that isn’t specifically listed in Indiana state laws, intimidation is illegal.

    After watching the video, I don’t know that I’d say he was showing them the gun to be intimidating. Quite the opposite, it made him look cowary and small. I can understand why the students felt uncomfortable, but I don’t know that a prosecutor could make the case for intimidation.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 months ago

        Right, brandishing implies intent to intimidate or threaten someone. That’s why I said in the second paragraph it doesn’t seem like he’s trying to be intimidating. To be clearer, what I should have said is “the term in question is brandishing” and the answer is “no, he wasn’t brandishing his weapon.”

      • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah if that were the case, police with a pistol on their hip or anyone open carrying would be brandishing. A bunch of states have permitless open carry. I think you have to have the gun in your hand to be guilty of brandishing, although I’m sure laws vary from state to state.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ehh, He unconcealed it on purpose. It’s still not enough to be brandishing but he was doing it to make a point.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Nope.

          In Indiana, this would fall under intimidation. Which is threats to modify or coerce behavior (without justification, I suppose,).

          She said it herself in the video. “I feel unsafe… that makes me feel unsafe.” Clearly the gesture (which was hardly needed,) was viewed as threatening.

          Depending on the state, brandishing may have more specific meanings, but generally, any attempt to call attention to the weapon (like exposing it on your hip,) is a use of force. More commonly, for example, putting your hand on the weapon.

          In ~8 years of reviewing incidents for between 300 and 800 armed security guards; I’ve never seen any sort of “I’m armed!” - including displaying or putting a hand on it (without drawing) ever actually descalate. It was always either going to be drawn, anyhow, or never needed in the first.

          It does, however, give the subject time to escalate themselves. So it always makes things worse.

          The fact this guy never actually acknowledged that he had made his (presumed) constituents - aka highschool kids - feel unsafe, says either he’s too fucking unaware to carry a firearm, too fucking dumb to be a state legislator, or scaring her was exactly what he wanted.

          Probably all three.

          • jimbo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            In Indiana, this would fall under intimidation. Which is threats to modify or coerce behavior (without justification, I suppose,).

            No it wouldn’t and you know it. You seem intelligent enough to have posted the specific statute that he violated, and you very tellingly left it out. Don’t lose your mind just because some asshat Republican showed that he had a gun.

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Sorry? I left it out? You replied three times to me tilling me im wrong. You saw the link.

              It seems you’re being just as dishonest here as you are accusing me of.

              Also… you may wish to read something

              Verbally threatening some one is use of force. Threatening with a gesture is use of force. In every state I’m aware of- which is about twenty, specifically- all treat a threat to use a fire arm as the same as using a fire arm

              I have always been trained to never (intentionally) expose a concealed fire arm (unless a cop is asking you to.) precisely because the gesture is easily misunderstood as a threat.

              But, you’re right, this guy could probably pass it off as debate. He shouldn’t be allowed to, though.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I got stopped by plainclothes cops one time and I wasn’t even sure if they were really cops, and one guy said “yeah, here’s my badge and this is my gun” and showed me. I was just oh, okay, but it came up in court, and the issue was it could be seen as intimidating (the cop lied and said it didn’t happen!).

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        All the cop had to do was show their badge and ID. No gun required to prove that they were a cop.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah. I thought if you were concealed carrying, any interaction with your gun that was visible from displaying, peaking, drawing all the way to pointing was considered a criminal threat.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        indiana law, apparently they call it ‘intimidation’. He opened his jacket and displayed it with the intention of modifying their behavior.

        • jimbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          You need to go re-read the link you posted, because you either didn’t understand it or you’re being highly dishonest about it.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        It depends on where you at, honestly. Showing off a concealed carry is just stupid anyway as the entire point is not to let people know you have a weapon.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        prolly. But they still at least have to respond. but a police report citing the incident looks pretty bad.

    • jimbo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      My mind cannot fathom how you managed to read that law and somehow connect any of the provisions to anything that this guy did.

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s why i never understood the angle of guns and big trucks are things deemed manly. I live on a super steep place, when i see dudes on bicycles, just huffing up there like a machine, i always think: what a bloke. When i see some ridiculous truck in my small town i just see a clown. Same with guns, it’s okay you’re scared of the worldbor think you’rs some sort of redneck aveenger.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I don’t understand why you think only rednecks have firearms. The world has changed, a large majority of firearm owners are not rednecks. Trump helped that.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sure, but I’ve met very few lefties who advertise it. Owning a gun isn’t really a part of most people’s personality if they aren’t crazy people.

          I like responsible gun ownership. You should be required to show competence with your firearm, both in usage an maintenance and storage, to own it though. You should have to go through a course (funded by taxes to ensure poorer people aren’t left out) before your purchase, and probably prove you have a safe place to store it and knowledge on how and why to store it.

          (Firearms are the most stolen item, and the idiots with unsecured firearms or in safes locked with “1776” have caused part of the illegal gun crises.)

          • ____@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Seems reasonable to me - I got my state’s id card for ownership of a firearm, and just haven’t felt compelled to take the 16 hour class for a carry permit.

            TBH, I have some concerns about the intersection of fed law and legal marijuana states that I’d rather not risk being the test case for.

            You bring up a very valid point about funding of the course and equity. On further reflection, anyone who wants to learn ought to have access, whether they want to own/carry, or not.

            The more educated and responsible citizens, the fewer sanctimonious fools who think “good guys with guns” stand a chance of stopping a motivated shooter with an assault rifle.

      • normalexit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think many of the guys out there carrying in a big truck are simply cosplaying what they think a “real man” is. They want to be cowboys in their shiny F150 trucks with Carhartts and a pistol, but actually work a desk job and have no need for any of it.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Cyclists are some of the most badass athletes on the planet. Go watch them race the Tour De France or the Giro De Italia and those dudes are blasting 120 miles every day in any weather for a month.

        Some hillbilly wouldn’t make it past the first half of the first day.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Jim Lucas is such a piece of shit. He only makes my piece of shit Indiana representative (Larry Buschon) look like less of a piece of shit in comparison.

    • ____@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I wasn’t familiar with Lucas, but l lived in Terre Haute until about a year ago and didn’t realize anyone could make Buschon look any less shitty.

    • Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I mean, this but I unironically? Brandishing like this is an illegal threat of deadly force, which can be used to straightforwardly argue self-defense. It’s a braindead move on the legislator’s part, most likely a pattern of behavior (I’ve dealt with people who used the threat of their guns to win arguments, and it very much was a regular thing) and he’s frankly lucky nobody has called his bluff yet.

      • jimbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re going to have a hard time even finding a statute to charge someone under for “brandishing” that would include merely showing someone that you’re carrying a weapon.

        • BaldProphet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          For the most part, it’s holding steady around 30%. I’ve read that certain demographics are seeing spikes in gun ownership lately, including women and Blacks.

    • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah and if there is no brandishing law in Indiana this could be viewed as possible assault. (Offen assault is the threat of violence, battery is the action of violence)

  • Artisian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    to anyone who understand this behavior - what’s the man trying to do here? Is there any charitable read? Having a hard time imagining it.

    • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I didn’t watch the video, but it sounds like it was in the context of discussing self defense. A student asked if he meant people should carry guns, so he showed that he was carrying one in an attempt to confirm that he practices what he preaches. He was probably also trying to normalize it. Pretty dumb, but obviously not intending to intimidate the kids.

    • RedditRefugee69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If you watch the video, it clearly didn’t seem like any kind of intentional intimidation. Definitely a whoopsie since brandishing is illegal in most but not his state. But we should be charitable to compensate for our own biases and I think the title is a bit misleading about the context

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Responsible gun owners sure do seem to have a lot of “whoopsies”.

        “Whoopsie, I seem to have brandised my weapon at children”

        “Whoopsie, I seem to have allowed my gun to be stolen”

        “Whoopsie, a family member seems to have comitted suicide with my poorly secured firearm”.

        “Whoopsie, I seem to have shot a child in the face over a misunderstanding”.

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mean… if you’re going to carry, don’t talk about it. Carrying is basically something that only makes the one carrying feel safer.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      9 months ago

      Was revealing the holstered weapon necessary, when he could have simply referred to it?

      Debatable. (Nah.)

      Did it intimidate?

      Perhaps. Hair on my neck would momentarily spike.

      Did the lawmaker aim to intimidate?

      Almost certainly not.

      Dude was admittedly nice enough to stop & chat with the kids. Everyone was polite & reasonable.

      It’s a damn shame the man lives in a world where he can even argue he feels safer carrying death on him. Things that can launch projectiles would be confined to fun & safe spaces (e.g. shooting ranges) - the only places people could safely use them - in a better world. But, he has a perception (one I don’t share). He discussed it, and used a visual aid.

      I think pointing towards the outside of his coat at his hip would’ve been smarter.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I guarantee the only reason he was “nice enough” to stop and talk to the kids was because he knew he was carrying, and he wanted to make them uncomfortable. Everything else was him working toward that goal, he had zero intention of actually having a good faith conversation with them.

        If he wasn’t carrying his handheld penis extender, he wouldn’t have gone over to talk to them in the first place