• jimbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    In Indiana, this would fall under intimidation. Which is threats to modify or coerce behavior (without justification, I suppose,).

    No it wouldn’t and you know it. You seem intelligent enough to have posted the specific statute that he violated, and you very tellingly left it out. Don’t lose your mind just because some asshat Republican showed that he had a gun.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Sorry? I left it out? You replied three times to me tilling me im wrong. You saw the link.

      It seems you’re being just as dishonest here as you are accusing me of.

      Also… you may wish to read something

      Verbally threatening some one is use of force. Threatening with a gesture is use of force. In every state I’m aware of- which is about twenty, specifically- all treat a threat to use a fire arm as the same as using a fire arm

      I have always been trained to never (intentionally) expose a concealed fire arm (unless a cop is asking you to.) precisely because the gesture is easily misunderstood as a threat.

      But, you’re right, this guy could probably pass it off as debate. He shouldn’t be allowed to, though.