Hi there.

A short introduction: This is an alt account. I’m a moderator here who has been unhappy with the state of news/political discussions here for a long time. The admins have kindly given me the opportunity to see if we can make some improvement the community here.

We will be doing some major revision of the rules left by the previous moderators and will use discussions in this thread as feedback on the direction we should take our community.

This will be an open discussion on the state of our community, the rules and our moderation practices. Feel free to give your inputs.

My goal is to foster thoughtful discussion in our community, and not let this place be a replica of r/politics.

First order of business, immediate rule change.

On !politics@lemmy.world, effectively immediately, we will no longer restrict political discussion to the politics of the United States of America. Discussion regarding of the state of politics from around the world is now welcome.

I will leave this pinned for 1-2 weeks for our team to take feedback and make our proposals then.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the challenge is going to be separating World News from Politics. Articles will need to have some kind of political angle to be appropriate here.

    So, for example, my submission of Daihatsu getting caught faking safety reports for 30 years, World News, nothing about that is political.

    Putin supporter falling out a window? (AGAIN?) I could see that being in one or the other or both.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also hope this doesn’t turn into “this is about WORLD politics. Why are you talking about America?”

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or vice versa, it will take time for people to get used to seeing non-US politics.

        Due to naming ambiguity, we might need to require country tags as well.

        News about a Georgia election… well, WHICH GEORGIA? ;)

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree, but I also think we’re going to have people complaining that there are too many people posting about American politics. We’ll see. Maybe the tag thing would be a good idea. I also don’t think, as a U.S. resident, that a community for U.S. politics would be a bad idea. I don’t know how many people would use it at this point though.

          • MagicShel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            It really depends on the balance of posts. It’s possible I would migrate to something more US focused but I’d have to see whether I’m unhappy with the ratio after the change. I don’t want to keep myself ignorant of the rest of the world, but if I can’t comment on a majority of posts because I know nothing about that country then it’s not really a community I fit into.

            But I recognize that’s a me problem and not a y’all problem.

    • Might Be@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      News should be news, I would like this community to focus on political discussions, editorials, and commentaries from a variety of viewpoints, if that makes sense.

      And to be frank, I don’t think topics like “Trump smells bad” is good political discussion, which is what I would aim to avoid.