• Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure it’s because Singapore has security cameras pointing everywhere. Also, caning is a big deterrent to theft.

            • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              stay

              stay

              stay

              This implies they’re a utopia and not a rich-people-only dystopia.

              Is the bigger picture murdering people consuming cannabis?

                • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Murder is acceptable if petty thefts are reduced? So the worth of a human life is roughly $200 - $2000, or the worth of a laptop?

                  If the only way to stop petty thefts is murder, petty theft cannot be prevented ethically.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The death penalty for drugs is a worthy sacrifice considering the extremely positive societal outcome.

                  “It’s good that we kill someone for smoking a joint because no one stole my laptop!” You have fucked up priorities.

      • SchizoDenji@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand how you’ve equated security cameras in a PUBLIC PLACE as “less privacy”.

        What do you want privacy for in a public place?

        • mulcahey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think the issue is “I want to do illegal things in public without consequence.” It’s more, “I don’t trust the mechanisms of enforcement to use this power justly.”

          For example: Radio City Music Hall used facial recognition tech to identify and ban a lawyer whose firm was suing them. She wasn’t even working the case. RCMH just issued a blanket ban. It’s abusive.

          And there are other risks. Stalking is a huge one. (Some creep takes your pic at the supermarket and now you spend a year of your life getting creepy messages and feeling unsafe everywhere you go.) Or there’s the risk that people who participate in lawful protest will face retribution or punishment by corrupt law enforcement.

          Kashmir Hill has a great book out about this now. You can read an interview with her here.

          • SchizoDenji@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            No dude, I have plenty to hide. Just nothing that I do in a public place though. Wonder when was the last time you were at one of them.

        • Calavera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they have facial tracking then they can basically keep track of everywhere you go