I’m so absolutely sick of it.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      GIMP is painfully behind the times that I only use it out of sympathy for FOSS. I even prefer Photopea despite half the working area wasted on ads and browser UI.

      Maybe that’ll change one day.

      • minyakcurry@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every single time Adobe is mentioned, everyone rushes to mention GIMP. I’m convinced 90% of them have never even opened GIMP before.

        • mommykink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because ten years ago GIMP was a good alternative to whatever version of Photoshop was out at the time. So those people ditched PS and used GIMP. But now Adobe has pumped tons of features into PS that the GIMP crowd doesn’t even know about, so they still think the two are still comparable.

          I still use GIMP exclusively but I’d be lying if I said watching others use Photoshop didn’t make me jealous.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This makes me sad. I usually only use GIMP for programmer art. I didn’t realize it was falling behind 😞

        • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          If it works for you that’s great! it’s sadly just not the photoshop contender it used to be 😮‍💨

  • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I literally just wanted to esign a document the other day, and in order to get the functionality I wanted ONE TIME, I had to create an account, give them my credit card info for a free trial, let Acrobat Reader download all the other functionality I didn’t need, which took 10 minutes. The program crashed, buttons didn’t work, it didn’t save the first time.

    I fucking hate Adobe.

    What’s a good PDF editor that does e-signatures that I don’t have to pay a long-term subscription for? Foxit is nice, but requires a subscription.

    • rollerbang@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using exactly Foxit for many years just for digital signing, without subscription. Currently on Mac.

      • hystericallymad@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also deployed FoxIt for the past 2 years. Super simple to deploy with Intune and authenticate with 365 credentials.

  • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is exactly why I have been running the same Adobe software for the last, what, 15 years now? Whatever the last one was before they changed to a subscription model, that’s the one I have.

  • HeavyDogFeet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I often have to use Adobe stuff in my line of work (its unfortunately the industry standard) I made the decision a couple of years back that Adobe software isn’t allowed to touch my personal devices. On the Mac, Creative Cloud is essentially malware. I use Affinity to replace photoshop and illustrator, while Apple Photos has been enough for me so far to replace Lightroom.

    • 9715698@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it possible to pay for an Adobe sub, and install only the so you want without any background update service?

      I wanted to install bridge, and it installed a management app. I find it not to trying at startup, but it still runs an update service regardless.

      I don’t understand how Adobe gets away with such invasive software.

      • aliteral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have money, and with it comes power. Also, main Adobe users seem to not care about shady bussiness practices because they “need” Adobe’s products.

  • smigao@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I signed up for creative cloud and accidentally signed for a year. They want 60$ to cancel the subscription. Suck my taint.

      • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unlike most online services that essentially do not offer refunds (you just ride out the subscription), Adobe has created more of a carrier type plan, where there is a yearly contract so it accrues the same penalty like any phone plan.

        So yeah, legal. Just the worst kind of legal. And that’s Adobe. Just the worst kind.

  • techietechtecherson@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey adobe, how about you stop contacting everyone in our organization using a single non-profit license of a single product and telling them we should all be on a single cloud account so we can pay several times more for the same thing just to get access to sharing services no one wants?

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They emailed our entire organization saying their license were expiring which resulted in 100s of calls to our service desk. Fucking hate Adobe.

  • DagonPie@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone that had to deal with adobe for 5 years for an 800 person studio. Fuck Adobe. For the rest of forever.

  • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Hey chatGPT, what would Blackbeard have to say about Adobe licensing?

    Adobe, be drivin’ me to madness with their confusin’ schemes. Ye need a map just to make sense of it all! They be chargin’ a king’s ransom for their software, and what do ye get in return? Aye, a license that’s as flimsy as a ship’s riggin’ in a storm.

    It’s a never-endin’ voyage through their terms and conditions, and I can’t fathom their logic. It be like navigatin’ the high seas with a broken compass. They be restrictin’ the use of their software, demandin’ we pay a ransom every month, and heaven forbid ye want to use it on multiple devices! They’ll make ye walk the plank for that.

    And don’t get me started on their audits, me heartie. They be sendin’ their parrots to check if ye be usin’ their software properly, threatenin’ to keelhaul ye if they find a single violation. It be daylight robbery, I tell ye!

  • WhataburgerSr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    After their fallout with Pantone, I was done.

    I immediately switched to Affinity and haven’t looked back. Yes, there is a learning curve and you will have to spend a few hours Googling how to do the same thing but it’s easily been able to do the same thing that I was doing before.

    The ONLY two features I miss from InDesign is GREP and scripts. Other than that, FUCK ADOBE.

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tangentially related… I work IT in a CNC shop. Most engineering prints that we get to make parts to have various specs on them for materials and various finishes. Those specs used to be free years ago, but they’ve most all been replaced, but not really updated at all. Now everytime they have a revision change, we have to buy the new revision from SAE for like $70 a piece. As shitty as that already is, in recent years, they have DRM locked them to a single user. So while we have 50+ employees with multiple needing to reference these for quality inspection or processing, it’s against the ToS to share those specs. We are supposed to buy one for each user which is fucking bogus.

    Fuck em. I screen snip each page and make a new PDF, or that one user prints it out and scans it in. The extra kicker is that while that’s not allowed, you can buy a paper copy that can be shared for the same cost, you just have to wait for it to be delivered.

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same with ISO docs. Imagine being required by law to follow specs you have to pay to know.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Imagine being required by law to follow specs you have to pay to know.

        Relevant case law:

        TL;DR: once “annotations” or “model codes” or whatever are incorporated into the actual law, they are no longer eligible for copyright.

        That doesn’t stop organizations like SAE and ISO from trying to bully and trick you into agreeing to pay them for copies that you obtain directly from them instead of trudging down to the local law library and making copies yourself, however. (And it’s even worse when you want convenient electronic copies instead of paper, because then they try to apply EULA bullshit, which I’ve already debunked in another comment.) IMO it’s probably best to get the documents from some third-party source so you never get on the standards org’s radar for a shakedown to begin with.

  • BluDood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just get hired by a company that pays them obscene amounts of money, then you don’t have to worry about it!

    • tsz@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Our last bill was about 28k, and we don’t get to use SAML for that price.