• Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    [off topic] There was a comic where someone slips Clark Kent information about an illegal plant dumping chemicals. He shows up as Superman and stops the crime, but the whistleblower is angry that Kent informed Superman instead of digging up the names of the real owners.

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is off topic, what does that scrawny journalist Clark Kent have to do with Superman?

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Conversely, there have been quite a few stories where Clark basically decides Superman would be inefficient at actually solving the issue, so he either busts out the handy dandy notebook and takes them down with his pen, or he calls in the big guns and tips off Lois (because the only thing more satisfying than smashing a corrupt asshole’s things is siccing your Pulitzer winning wife on them).

      He’s a very good reporter. Got a real nose for a story, like he can see through walls or hear conversations behind closed doors or something. It’s weird.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that George Reeves had the best Clark Kent. Most other versions play Clark for laughs. Reeves played him as a day-to-day reporter, easy going but not a chump.

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wouldn’t say “most” versions play Clark as a chump, though Christopher Reeves is clearly playing up the “mild-mannered” schtick quite a bit in arguably the most well known depiction in the last 50 years.

          Most versions play Clark as competent, they just don’t bother to really dig into Clark as the crack reporter, because that’s Lois’ primary thing, so they give her that screentime.

          The most recent animated show, My Adventures With Superman, actually does a good job of making Clark the reporter an integral part of the story.

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I haven’t seen My Adventures… yet. I have seen the non-bald Mxyzptlk and am filled with righteous indignation.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think folks don’t appreciate how the DC big characters actually work outside of their superheroics to fight the badguys.

        The other example is Batman, People watch the Nolan movies and don’t realize that 99% of the time Batman is doing detective work following up on leads from other super detectives, including Clark, or putting his vast wealth to work trying to uproot the poverty and corruption in Gotham without getting killed by the entrenched interests making use of that poverty and corruption.

        His supporting cast is literally just him being the world’s most over the top big brother program member, save entirely other lead superheros, everyone in Batman’s belfry is some degree of rescue case from the streets or an abusive past life.

  • BoxerDevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Make it a movie or series and I’ll watch it. Only problem Henry Cavil isn’t good in comedies

    • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He might still fit because you would think clark Kent’s humour would be very dry and mostly rely on timing. The contrast would be great having the silliness come from the CIA characters who could be extremely animated and frustrated. I can only imagine the scenes about the CIA agents trying to explain to their boss why they keep failing

        • satanmat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          That would be the best way for it to work. He barely notices these guys, and they keep failing…. Like Michael Palin in “A Fish called Wanda”

          Not a bad idea actually

        • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Directed by Wes Anderson, with Jason Schwartzman playing Superman/Clark Kent, Saoirse Ronan as Lois Lane, Bill Murray playing Perry White, and Owen Wilson as Luthor. CIA boss played by Jeff Goldblum, vice-President of the USA played by Anjelica Huston, and President not seen on-screen but voice acted by Ira Glass.

    • blujan@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      The man from uncle was great as he just played a straight face man and the comedic stuff happened around him

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It might with Superman being completely oblivious that they’re trying to kill him so he’s just playing it straight. The CIA would be poisoning him and stuff and Superman would just not even notice.

    • Piecemakers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey now, this last season of Witcher is hilarious, once you know the background drama between the diehard fans and the greedy fucks actually pulling the levers. I don’t think I’ve seen Geralt with fewer fucks to give, and I’ve put in hours in those games (IIRC, only Skyrim tops that total). 🤣😅🥹

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hell the CIA had enough trouble trying to kill Castro, exploding cigars etc, etc etc, that this would almost write itself. And since they were so bad at killing a normal human I doubt they would ever get suspicious that Clarke manages to avoid every trap they set for him.

    Alternate take. Castro was an alien…

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      You make the wrong assumptions there. The truth behind why we hear about laughable attempts for Castro and not much more isn’t that this is how the CIA rolls. It could also be that this is one of the few times they failed at all.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      With Che they learned from all the Castro attempts and just straight up tortured him to death

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Huh? Che was captured and executed by Bolivians.

        • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bolivian funded by and answerable to the CIA. The CIA funded his hunt and capture but conveniently claim they didn’t want him dead. In the end it was the CIA money that killed him

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The CIA wanted him sent to Panama, Bolivians themselves chose to kill him.

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One scene could be where they’re in the office and the facial recognition software keeps trying to identify Clark Kent as Superman, but they just can’t believe it, and one guy says “That’s not Superman just look at him. This guy wears glasses!”.

    Edit: In case anyone out there reading this is actually from the CIA, we’re just kidding guys/gals, we believe in you.

  • turbonewbe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seeing Christopher Reeve as Clark Kent reminds me how good he was and how I miss him.

    I love Cavill but sorry he failed his acting of CK. With or without the costume he plays as Superman.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Superman and Lois is so underrated. The stigma around the CW DC shows is well earned, but it really doesn’t deserve to be grouped in with them. In fact it made a point of distancing itself from them by explicitly stating it’s not part of the Arrowverse.

        There’s a lot going on in that show really doesn’t get the credit it deserves. Particularly watching Clark Kent be a father is aces.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The stigma around the CW DC shows is well earned

          I still lament the loss of the Dragonriders of Pern series that they were going to do but f’d up.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This scene always comes to mind when I think of Reeve’s performance

        For me its the “General, care to step outside?” scene (and Zod’s reply line).

        That, any scene with his unique smile.

    • rckclmbr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Still better than Brandon Routhe. Sorry Brandon, I’m sure you’re a nice guy, but your Superman sucked

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nah, Brandon Routhe was fine, it’s just his Superman is written incredibly passive, and he was more or less being told "You’re Christopher Reeves Superman so…do that. We’re not going to give you any material that comes close to what Chris got to work with, but, ya know, still do it. "

        It’s just such a bizarrely written movie in the first place, I have trouble blaming anyone in it for their performances. Well… except for that one guy we don’t talk about anymore.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a really good point. I didn’t notice until you said it, but yeah, he plays Kent and Superman exactly the same.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        but yeah, he plays Kent and Superman exactly the same.

        Well it was a more serious movie, for a more serious time, than the original Superman movie, so to expect that kind of goofy Clark Kent type of acting wouldn’t be realistic.

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah goofy Clark Kent has not been a thing for a while in Superman media, anyone expecting that in a modern movie is showing their age a bit.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            anyone expecting that in a modern movie is showing their age a bit.

            Well to be fair, I’m that age as well. I actually saw that movie in the theater.

            But yes, it’s not for modern audiences, they have different tastes now.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see the issue with him playing both characters the same. That’s as valid an interpretation as any, and much more in line with modern Superman.

      The idea of Clark as a bumbling mild-mannered reporter as part of his disguise is very dated.

          • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That was Henry Cavill being called back for reshoots after principal photography had already wrapped months before. By that point he was already working on another role, and the mustache was part of it. He made a perfectly understandable decision to say “I’ll do reshoots and help you fix this dumpster fire you made, but I’m still committed to this other role, so fix the stache in post”.

            • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, he couldn’t. He was reshooting those scenes after he’d already started production on another movie. One in which his character had a mustache. That was absolutely not on him, it was on the directors for not being competent enough to make a decent movie the first time around.

  • TheControlled@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the first pitch on Reddit or Lemmy in 12 years that is actually good and doable and interesting. Make Lex Luthor one of the assassins in his early days… Yada yada yada

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only problem is they wouldn’t be surprised their attempts failed. Nearly everything the CIA touches goes wrong.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nearly everything the CIA touches goes wrong.

      To be fair, if they’re doing their job right, we will never hear of it.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      They might be surprised when they slip 50x the lethal dose of a toxic only they know about into his food and he doesn’t even notice.

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Turns out due to poor inventory management, it expired in 1967 and has degraded to a non-toxic state

        • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Better yet, it achieves a hyper toxic airborne state - nearly everyone in the downtown skyscraper where they try to poison him goes passes out.

          It’s only by the timely arrival of Superman to super-breath the ventilation systems that anyone makes it out alive

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m kinda wondering if this would actually work with the audience who knows Superman’s lore. It’d be like watching an episode of Blues Clues. “Gee, I can’t seem to figure out why those nineteen whole bullets that absolutely hit him square in the chest didn’t even slightly kill the guy.” “HE’S SUPERMAN YOU CONSUMMATE DINK!”

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      All of the assassination attempts would need to involve less overt methods. Poisoning, pushing from tall buildings, etc. Most likely they’d need to outsource the jobs to mercenaries, since the CIA agents would figure it out immediately.

      Edit: I wonder if my response just landed me on some list. Ugh…

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Edit: I wonder if my response just landed me on some list. Ugh…

        Honestly, there’s times I wonder if all of us who just post on Lemmy would be on some list.

      • alansuspect@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t like any Marvel stuff but Wandavision was pretty good, until they Marvelled all over it in the last few episodes.

      • Zammy95@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wandavision was one of the last things Marvel has put out that I honestly enjoyed. It’s been much more rough since (with a couple exclusions, but yeah, downhill trend for me mostly)

        • lobut@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I enjoyed Loki. I thought the tone for Hawkeye was a bit off. I was expecting a fun Christmas romp and they randomly drop some serious stuff on you.

          Not gonna lie though. I haven’t been to the cinema to watch an MCU movie in a while. Shang Chi was the last one, I think? Dr Strange, and Thor getting a critically poor reception made me skip them. Gotg3 did well but now I feel like I gotta do homework to catch up so I couldn’t be arsed.

          I agree with the downhill trend. I am looking forward to catching The Marvels though because it looks like fun.

            • Killer_Tree@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Standalone” - “watch after endgame” Unfortunately you contradict yourself. My wife watched GotG 1 & 2, but none of the Infinity War or Endgame. If it was truly standalone, then she wouldn’t have been asking me questions about what the heck is going on every five minutes when we’re watching GotG3 and I wouldn’t have had to tell her that people disappeared, but came back, and the timeline got borked, etc.

    • jasondj@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh man can Laurie be a conspiracy-minded agent like Moulder?

      Ooh and Keanu keeps on downplaying or disproving his theories. And then eventually Laurie is right and Keanu is like “Whoa”.

      Shit writes itself.