• sucius1@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    5 days ago

    Controlling everything in a car through screens is a safety hazard. It’s insane that’s even allowed.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      There are very few core controls and they should absolutely be physical.

      I hate screens as much as anyone but I honestly don’t think there’s much that can’t be put behind one.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        5 days ago

        Climate controls need to be physical, though.
        They are safety critical when your windscreen fogs over.
        Radio, too. For emergency broadcasts.
        And obviously any driving controls, like lights, indicators, cruise control, wipers, …

        Basically, anything that was present in a car 30 years ago needs to have physical buttons.

        • metaStatic@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          Climate controls need to be physical, though.

          I had an 02 Peugot with automated climate controls. Shits not new. it’s one of the few cases where I will not go back to the caveman way. automated headlights are another.

          a case can be made for demister buttons but I haven’t owned a car made this century that would fog up so that’s a pull over and figure this shit out for the first time affair not a take your eyes off the road and dick around with controls physical or otherwise affair.

            • metaStatic@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              5 days ago

              again that’s not something you should be dealing with doing 110 on the freeway while steering with your knees and eating cup ramen.

              • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                I think my “peak American” was that time many years ago when I went driving down the I35 interstate in rural Kansas…eating a plate of chicken fettuccine alfredo.

                It’s OK. The statute of limitations has long passed.

                Although, now that I think of it, this might be my peak Italian moment, though I’m not of Italian ancestry…

                Anyway, it was delicious Fazoli’s.

                • barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  Absolutely not. Italians may drive like madmen, but they drive well and are focussed.

                  Also why the hell would you add chicken to butter and parmigiano.

          • lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            We have a 2015 Toyota Highlander with automatic climate controls. Except when it’s 72° outside and 110° inside the car when I get in, I don’t want it lazily whispering 72° air at me (which it does sometimes), I want it to blow ice-fucking-cold air for several minutes so I don’t sweat my balls off waiting for the interior temp to come down. Having physical controls is quite nice for that. I can set it back to 72 or 69nice or whatever after the fact.

            Both of my cars have automatic headlights, so 95% of the time we don’t really touch those controls. Every once in a while I’ll turn them on during a storm, when the light level isn’t quite low enough to trigger the headlights.

    • imvii@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I hate key fobs, I have two cars both with massive fobs. I can’t keep both on my keyring if I’m planning to put my keys in my pants pocket. I also hate these stupid things are $200-300 to replace - even more at a dealer.

      They don’t even make the car more secure or harder to steal. Get rid of them.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    5 days ago

    I would also ban touch sensitive fixed controls. My father’s Avalon has dedicated controls for the HVAC but they’re touch sensitive, so you set the climate controls to 80C and full fan if you just wipe dust off the panel while the car’s on.

    You should be able to train your hand on the control, get a good grip on it, and then move it in such a way that a control input is realized. It shouldn’t have to beep at you to tell you it’s done a thing.

    I can turn the air conditioner in my pickup on and off by feel alone, same with the basic radio controls.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      VW id3, maybe the whole id series, has this bullshit. I test drove the id3 a couple of months ago. Buttons in the wheel are touch, but you can push them as well which feels clunky. rant warning! Giant freaking screen that got mad at me for trying to adjust the ac while driving (supposedly I tap it too fast, and got a time-out). Stupid LEDs under the windshield that tries to communicate stuff by lightning up in either side or move across and shit, that was really confusing. It even had mood lighting. Wtf, in a car?!? Putting the car in sports mode, to get an idea of how it can drain the battery on the motorway, changed the mood from blue to red.

      Stupidest fucking car I’ve ever driven. Went with a fully optioned zoe instead. 5k€ less for the same year, and actual buttons for stuff. Although I’d like to meet the engineer, who thought sticking buttons behind the wheel where they’re hidden, was a good idea.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      And temperature up/down and fan power should both be dials/rotary encoders, none of this “one push per degree/power level” BS.

    • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I have a 15 year old car with a touchscreen. It’s not a capacitive screen, it’s resistive. That means I need to actually push a little bit to register a touch. It works great!

      • navordar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        They even work with gloves! Of course, one could say “just turn up the heat”, but it takes a while to warm up the car. And heated steering wheel is still not a standard feature.

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 days ago

    I want to be able to replace my infotainment system without hassle or loss of functionality

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 days ago

      The good old days when the first thing you did when buying that old beater was change the radio to one with CDs or even MP3s… Of course if you didn’t have the budget for that you could always get one of these cassettes with a jack cable to plug into your disc man, the only issue is it would skip when you hit a pothole.

      • lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Unless you had a fancy discman with anti-skip. Reminds me of driving my dad’s 1963 VW Beetle in high school before we restored it.

        Also… Good old days? I did that with my minivan barely three years ago with an Alpine ILX-407… But that one doesn’t have a CD player because I don’t use CDs anymore. I haven’t used CDs in a car since high school, now that I think about it… I just kept my iPod connected to that car, hidden from view.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    they already did a study that touchscreens are too distracting and dangerous, buttons are more intuitive and quicker to use, without looking at the menu.

    • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      IKR? The EU legislation to require a common charging system is already making big improvements. Seeing so many things, not just phones, that are now chargable via USB C. So many electronic gadgets, like my shaver, screwdriver and others no longer coming with a wallwart adapter each to live in my drawers and jam them up. Benefits for everyone, apart from the occasional company (Apple) that locks in to a specialised charger for profit reasons.

  • Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    But if there’s less screens then where will manufacturers put the advertising???

    • amelore@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Radio and parking camera, maybe sat nav for users that don’t do android auto or carplay.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    No no no, cars need the least amount of software, no touch and all buttons. And 0 OTA. Zero, Nada. And the only software that should be there is that very minimal radio and some dash functions controllers, that’s it. I’m so sick of having a phone on wheels. It’s a car, and can be called “death on wheels” and drivers need the most attention they can.

    • lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Cars have had a multitude of controllers (which means software) for over 30 years now. It’s the cellular connection you don’t want or need.

      The only way I would ever have a connected car is if the software was under my control and could be self-hosted. Nothing crazy, just stuff like weather, traffic, and maybe remote diagnostics. But that’s just my nerdy side coming out.

      Both of my cars are fairly modern (2008, 2015), but neither have any sort of connection to the outside world, and despite both having touchscreen interfaces, all critical functions are button-operated.

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s what I meant. I know that there has to be some software. That’s why I mentioned zero OTA. So the modem. We don’t need that. No one asked for it. They use it to syphon our personal data and sell it to the insurance companies.