• SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I didn’t specify that at all?

      Do you understand what cash on hand is?

      • theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        You say the math is written out, and then compare one overpaid person to the number of striking workers. Pretty dumb.

        And you’re the one that doesn’t understand cash or shareholders.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I do exactly the opposite of that, actually.

          You literally have as much time as you’d like to read and parse that post, and can even ask me questions if the words are too confusing.

          Hint:

          365x the average workers salary divided by 150,000 workers.

          This is suggesting robbing the CEO to pay Paul is not the slam dunk win people (including NIMBY Robert Reich) think it is.

              • theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re the one who thinks that the CEO to worker pay ratio is literally only about the CEO. You also think that cash on hand can be freely distributed to workers if that’s what management wants. I’m not the idiot here. You are.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  If you mean something other than CEO to worker pay, perhaps you should articulate that. You still have not made any sense whatsoever.

                  Cash on hand can absolutely be spent in a wide variety of ways, be it M&A, disaster scenarios, or sudden changes to business structure. That’s one of the most significant purposes of cash on hand.

                  Have you ever worked in a senior position at a company? Ever run your own business?

                  • theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Everyone who is not an idiot knows that it’s about executive pay in general vs worker pay.

                    Way to not address the specific point I made about cash. But answer this instead: who owns the cash a company generates?