• theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    You say the math is written out, and then compare one overpaid person to the number of striking workers. Pretty dumb.

    And you’re the one that doesn’t understand cash or shareholders.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I do exactly the opposite of that, actually.

      You literally have as much time as you’d like to read and parse that post, and can even ask me questions if the words are too confusing.

      Hint:

      365x the average workers salary divided by 150,000 workers.

      This is suggesting robbing the CEO to pay Paul is not the slam dunk win people (including NIMBY Robert Reich) think it is.

          • theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re the one who thinks that the CEO to worker pay ratio is literally only about the CEO. You also think that cash on hand can be freely distributed to workers if that’s what management wants. I’m not the idiot here. You are.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If you mean something other than CEO to worker pay, perhaps you should articulate that. You still have not made any sense whatsoever.

              Cash on hand can absolutely be spent in a wide variety of ways, be it M&A, disaster scenarios, or sudden changes to business structure. That’s one of the most significant purposes of cash on hand.

              Have you ever worked in a senior position at a company? Ever run your own business?

              • theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Everyone who is not an idiot knows that it’s about executive pay in general vs worker pay.

                Way to not address the specific point I made about cash. But answer this instead: who owns the cash a company generates?

                • twistypencil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You two stop. You are acting like people who misunderstand each other because of words, but are flinging around attacks because the medium is restricting your ability to have a constructive discussion. Now kiss and make up

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Everyone who is not an idiot knows that it’s about executive pay in general vs worker pay.

                  Lol this is nonsense.

                  First off, executives are literally workers. You claim to have an MBA in your post history yet you understand nothing about how businesses actually work