• Sergio@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yeah only 2 generations ago, LGBT people were considered mentally ill. 4 generations ago women were considered unfit to vote. 8 generations ago about half the US though it was OK to own slaves. It takes a while for ideas to die out. That’s why US elections turn out the way they do.

    • flora_explora@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Humanity isn’t progressing uniformly forward like this. Lgbtqia+ people were considered normal part of society by various cultures. Also Magnus Hirschfeld was an advocate for lgbtqia+ people a hundred years ago. Slavery has been transformed into modern slavery because the western world has found other, more concealed ways to force people into labor. Ideas may die out, but they will pop into people’s head again and again.

      • araneae@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        And yet discussing progress in this manner can be a confort. All that you said was true… But what the person you replied said was also true. Two generations since fertilizer or two generations since we locked in Malthusian anarchy[please note I do not espouse Malthusianism]. Three generations since the worst war known to man and three generations that did not experience that kind of war. Glass half full, glass half empty. It’s correct to question the myth of unstoppable progress thru which you can just kick your feet up and relax. But equally is it important to keep perspective remember that, yeah, eight generations ago chattel slavery was a bonafide institution and four generations women were unfranchised. Things get better and they get worse. We make progress and it is wiped away. We still keep trying.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Wonder how long it’ll take before we get to step forward again. As far as I’m seeing, we’re in for a long ride back. Not just for 4 years.

  • Deebster@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    14 days ago

    I was thinking that it’s now 81 mothers ago, but then I got distracted by the fact that there was no year 0AD and now I’m thinking that roughly 80 is good enough.

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 days ago

      That’s also assuming you’re the first born of the first born of the first born, and so on. And the further back you go, the more individual kids the average mother is likely to have. After all, you had to have like 12 kids just so 3 of them would make it past 9.

      So your greatx12 grandmother might’ve started having kids at 15, but she still might not have had your ancestor till years later.

  • Ulvain@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 days ago

    Let’s push it one step further and frame history since agriculture, 9500 years ago, against the upper limit of a human lifetime now, about 100 years. This would mean recorded times started only less than 100 human lifespans ago. Bleh

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Yes also this diagram:

    Gives you a clear sense of how quickly things are turning.

    In a geological sense, all of humanity isn’t even a heartbeat.