• paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You think Apple isn’t using their own codec? I always assumed AirPods used their own stuff when using an Apple device with them.

    • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They can’t. Not now anyway as clearly stated in the article they have licensed aptX. Patents and whatnot likely won’t let them push their own for a couple of years. I’m surprised Apple doesn’t develop their own alternative to BT. They always complain it’s the biggest bottleneck in getting high quality anything over the air.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unless the contract they signed says otherwise, there’s nothing stopping you from swapping out bits and pieces even when you have a license for a collection of patents like for bluetooth components. Sony does it!

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So what? Qualcomm owns the Qualcomm codec patent. Old news.

            However, Bluetooth explicitly allows you to add support for custom codecs on both ends, so Apple can ignore the existence of the Qualcomm codec and use their own.

            Sony is literally already doing that in both their smartphones and headphones with LDAC

            Apple has AAC

            • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not how patents work. Clearly if Apple didn’t need Qualcomm, they couldn’t have signed the deal.

              Old news is news.

              • Natanael@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Are you trolling you absolutely nutjob, OF COURSE if Apple uses a different thing which is not patented because the patent owner DID NOT invent that COMPLETELY DIFFERENT thing then Apple don’t have to pay for patent licensing fees for a thing THEY DON’T USE

                And as I’ve explained so many times that you have to be illiterate to not have understood the point, Qualcomm is not the only company with a lossless algorithm and bluetooth itself doesn’t limit your algorithm choices