• meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not how patents work. Clearly if Apple didn’t need Qualcomm, they couldn’t have signed the deal.

    Old news is news.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you trolling you absolutely nutjob, OF COURSE if Apple uses a different thing which is not patented because the patent owner DID NOT invent that COMPLETELY DIFFERENT thing then Apple don’t have to pay for patent licensing fees for a thing THEY DON’T USE

      And as I’ve explained so many times that you have to be illiterate to not have understood the point, Qualcomm is not the only company with a lossless algorithm and bluetooth itself doesn’t limit your algorithm choices