If you hit “next”, the consent window opens again and if you refuse any of them, you get put back at this screen so you’re stuck in a loop.

This shitty practice is even endorsed by Google, as they are promoting this game to try out and earn points.

Edit: game is called Jewel Gold Empire: Match 3 and it’s from some Korean company it seems: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.penta.empire.google

Obviously I uninstalled it immediately after

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    12 days ago

    If you’re in the EU, this is illegal. Consent has to be given freely for it to have legal weight. That means, it cannot be tied to the performance of the service, unless providing the data is strictly necessary for providing the service.

    I guess, they get away with it, because no one cares enough to sue a shitty game.

    • .Donuts@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 days ago

      I am, but what can I do? Try and reporting it via the obtuse methods of Google to have them investigate themselves seems pointless

      • wrekone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        12 days ago

        The only thing that’s pointless is doing nothing.

        Now, I’m not arguing that fighting against this is worth your time. I’m making more a semantic argument that hopelessnes and apathy only allow things to get worse.

        Also, fuck this game. Don’t play it.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        I mean, if you do want to do something about it, reporting it to your regional data protection officer would be the first step. Then they’ll contact whomever is responsible for this game and tell them to change it or get sued.

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    12 days ago

    Well this is a step up from when they were doing it anyway and didn’t have to tell you.

    • .Donuts@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      I originally didn’t want to include it to not give them any publicity, but a lot of folks seem to agree with you so I added a link to the OP

  • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I don’t think I’ve had a mobile game on my phone in 10 years, are there any actual decent ones? They all look so generic.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Indie PC games that charge money for a mobile port. I have stardew valley, binding of Isaac, balatro, slay the spire, monster train, on my phone. (Several are included with Apple Arcade, though I would definitely not subscribe to Arcade if it weren’t included with my other stuff. Also I personally wouldn’t play stardew or Isaac without a controller.)

      If it’s “free” it’s almost always obscenely abusive. (There are a handful of exceptions, including some open source ones, but I couldn’t name any off the top of my head.)

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          I’m not as hooked on it as some. It feels kind of same-y over time, and the “it’s poker” thing doesn’t scratch any of the same itch as regular poker.

          But it’s sure as hell better than almost any “free” mobile game because it doesn’t have a team of people special tailoring algorithms to decide when to cheat to make you win and when to cheat to screw you over in order to pull as much money as possible.

      • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        Ya just generic phone games, I haven’t touched them since jetpack joyride. Actually the last game I played on my phone was pokemon emerald on my ipod touch emulator lol, I’m pretty behind the times.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      The only mobile games I play are Luck Be a Landlord, Ascension, Shattered Pixel Dungeon, and lately the new Pokémon TCG.

      My favorite of them is Ascension. I love that game so much.

    • MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I really enjoy Mini Metro. I’ve been addicted to Dots for years, it’s the very best digital fidget.

      I paid for a Need for Speed game some 8 years ago and that was pretty OK for a few hours.

      A Dark Room is also really good.

      That’s about it, to be honest. If you want to pick up a controller, there’s a decent library of older PC or console games that run on phones now - emulators are also an option.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    What was on the “Next” screen? Seems like you could decline on the next screen that would have the options and such

    • .Donuts@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      As stated in my post, hitting next would bring back the consent window and if you rejected any of the hundreds of vendors, it would bring you back to this screen again.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    They sure do value privacy, it’s worth a lot to them to sell it. Maybe they should have written “your privacy is valuable to us”. Extra points for throwing “gaming journey” in there, lol.

  • Theo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    That’s not consent, that’s quid pro quo! They value the money they get by exposing your privacy to vendors.