Summary

China has become the world’s largest car exporter by dominating electric vehicle (EV) production, surpassing traditional carmakers in Europe, Japan, and the U.S.

This shift stems from China’s heavy investment in battery technology, supply chains, and generous subsidies, enabling it to produce cheaper EVs, like the BYD Seal, compared to Western competitors.

Europe and America, reliant on outdated internal combustion engine expertise, have struggled to adapt to this disruptive innovation.

Many nations are imposing tariffs on Chinese EVs, but without robust domestic battery infrastructure, Western car industries face mounting challenges as the EV transition accelerates.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    20 days ago

    Xi openly said and made no secret that China was investing in RESEACH and DEVELOPMENT in 2014. There was no surprise. It isn’t due to Chinese subsidies either. It is simply R&D instead of corporate criminals fluffing quarterly earnings with absolutely no commitment to even the company itself, and certainly not customers, neighbors, country, the world ecosystem, or humanity as a species. The USA gave GM 6 billion dollars for EV R&D in 2017. The corporate criminals used it to do a stock buy back to fluff their short term earnings. We should not be getting punished with tariffs to subsidize criminals. Let these shits fail and fall apart first. Then build something new from the ashes. Their inability to fail is the primary reason that they are failing. We really do need a league of c-sweet assassin heroes, or a dark knight of the real Gotham.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 days ago

      Chinese constructors indeed told this plan, I’ve seen the interviews, they’ve been following it exactly and got the results they were after. We knew this 10 years ago. There should not be any surprise.

      We knew the Western manufacturers would deny, delay and lobby against this to keep shareholder value up, to cry foul when sales take a hit and they did not disappoint. It’s the classic market disruption, something we’ve seen many times in history, but now on the losing side. Again, no surprise.

      Capitalism has a fatal flaw with long term planning and it’s been exploited masterfully by China. Actually China had plans to uproot the entire fossil fuel sector and replace it with their renewables, so hold on for a lot more drama.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Across Europe, car companies are cutting jobs and shutting factories - to the extent that some question their very existence. So it’s worth asking the question: what’s gone wrong with Europe (and for that matter America’s) car industry?

    Maximizing share value at the expense of quality, productivity, and affordability for consumers. Like transnational corporations ALWAYS do when they’re allowed to by negligent and often complicit governments.

    TL;DR: Under-regulated capitalism is what’s wrong.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      Competition of Chinese vs. European industries is not faire, because there are worker rights in Europe. Chinese companies are allowed to underpay and therefore produce much cheaper products. If Europeans want to buy products made by fairly payed workers and support their own companies, they need to disallow unfair competition to enter their market. So yeah, under-regulated capitalism, I agree.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Meanwhile, North America is applying tariffs to Chinese Electric Vehicles, rather than subsidizing North American EVs, allowing North American car manufacturers to continue to invest in and sell Gas Vehicles.

    If we actually cared about competitiveness we would be subsidizing EVs to match China (if not exceed) so that NA companies could invest in new technology and supply chains. Instead by discouraging foreign competition, we’re just defending our auto industry’s right to not innovate and to keep burning fuel.

    • cyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      The problem is that the main American(*) EV maker, Tesla, is politically toxic to the save-the-planet camp. Whereas the favored US carmakers are incompetent.

      (*) Looked at another way, Tesla is part of the Chinese EV wave, not in opposition to it. More than 50 percent of its manufacturing capacity and profits are from its Shanghai plant.

      • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        Another problem is that American car makers are not interested in making affordable small vehicles, they’re interested in maximizing their per vehicle profit margins which means SUVs and trucks. Very few options for compacts globally, let alone in north America.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        No, Tesla is not. Ford would not be part of the Chinese EV wave just because it was able to sell cars in China (if it could).

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      They should be doing both.

      30% Tariff on PRC cars (note: not just EVs) which directly funds a 30% subsidy on US made EVs. (just EVs)

  • cyd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    It’s not (or at least not just) about subsidies, cheap Chinese labor, etc. It’s a fairly classic tech disruption story. Globally, the established carmakers know the future is electric, but they’ve got existing plants, workers who are trained to build ICEs, long established suppliers who make ICE parts, and so forth. You can argue that executives are being paid big bucks to solve such issues, which is true, but it’s truly a hard problem. Especially when these are real factories and workers and industrial equipment you’re dealing with.

    But why did the disrupters come from China? Everyone is pointing to state support and existing strengths in battery tech, which are supply side factors, but there are also reasons on the demand side. Chinese people have relatively few cars (300 cars per capita, versus 850 per Capita in the US or 603 in the UK). As people get richer and start buying cars, there’s a chance for EV makers to get in the door. This, by the way, is why it makes sense that the Chinese EVs are entering on the cheap end of the market, whereas Tesla, which started out selling to western consumers, entered on the premium end.

    China has its own ICE carmakers, but they aren’t established enough (and politically connected enough) to really push back against the onslaught of EV firms. (China can hardly impose tariffs on itself…) And at this point, the smarter ones like Geely have decided to go with the flow.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 days ago

    I’m so done with American automakers. Politicians want a free and open market but pass protectionism and subsidies for their corrupt buddies in the industry. Chinese companies simply leveraged their assets and knowledge to make good EVs while their American counterparts only cared about using whatever cash infusions they received from the government for their own personal gain. If you disagree, just know that the upcoming administration is full of oligarchs who will try to regulate their way into monopolies through tariffs, legislation, judicial review, and the dismantling of important governmental agencies.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 days ago

    Saw a BYD advertisement here in Copenhagen the other day. Made all these claims of Chinese EVs in Europe a lot more real.

    Copenhagen is gonna be a difficult market, though. There are a lot of Teslas driving about.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    20 days ago

    It’s much easier to lower the overhead on your car prices by totally eliminating the R&D when you don’t care about intellectual property theft.