• Kalash@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve never seen an adolescents defend capitalism. They tend to be either apolitical or anarchists.

    • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The communists on Lemmy are cringe as fuck and have to make up these situations to justify their positions.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also they’re nearly all born into wealth lol

        Just drop by hexbear some time. It’s fucking hilarious to read their discussion thread, because they’re all children of software engineers and shit.

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This has to be a lie. I’ve never seen a single kid educated enough to even know what anarchy is. But they’re definitely dumb enough to parrot their parents.

      • Kalash@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’ve never seen a group of adolescents punks? Have ever been outside?

        • irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Adolescent punks have zero idea what anarchy is. They just hate their dads

          • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nobody has any idea what anarchy is. The one tenet of the philosophy is that any time someone tries to define it in any concrete way so that it can be discussed and criticized the anarchists all come out of the woodwork to say “no, that’s not it.” They never say what it is, though, because it isn’t anything.

            • irmoz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I can’t imagine the depths of arrogance and ignorance it requires to say that a political theory centuries in the making, with countless theorists writing lengthy tomes on the subject, has nothing to it.

              I can quite easily summarise what it is, though. People self organising with no hierarchy. If you want it even simpler, anarchy is not having a ruler or leader; you can glean that just from the construction of the word, “an” (without) ,“archy” (rule), literally, “without a ruler”. There you go! I very much doubt you’ve talked to any anarchists, if you’ve never heard any say that. If you have, you certainly didn’t listen.

              Mikhail Bakunin

              Noam Chomsky

              Pierre-Joseph Proudhon

              Emma Goldman

              Peter Kropotkin

              Just a few names for you to look into, in the field that has no consistent theory, because no one knows what it is.

          • Kalash@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Actually, they have a pretty good idea of the core principle of “rejecting authority”. That’s the natural state of the adolescent already.

            How you would get an adolescent to naturally align with capitalism though, is a mystery for me. Seems like shit lemmygrad would make up.

                  • irmoz@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Liberalism is the dominant ideology enforced by states of the world. It is the establishment, the status quo. Agreeing with it is agreeing with authority. More than that, though, liberalism requires authority to function. So to say you reject authority, yet are a liberal, makes no sense.

            • irmoz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Because we’re indoctrinated into it from birth. You have to put up active efforts to ignore or critically examine it, in order to believe differently.

              Also, hating your dad isn’t rejecting authority, and rejecting authority isn’t anarchism. It’s pretty close, though.

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It could be a regional thing. capitalism is practically a religion in the US that parents indoctrinate their kids into.

      We prime them from young ages to buy what the commercials show them

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I was in high school it was still popular for kids to be ‘libertarians’. Right-leaning area, naturally.