• TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    19 hours ago
    1. Misuse of meme format.
    2. Ungrammatical while insulting others’ intelligence.
    3. Additional relevant things happened in Ukraine 2014 than the annexation of Crimea. Do you know what they are?
          • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Fall for what? Correction on a meme and pointing to basic political history in Ukraine?

            • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Ah yes pointing to the completely organic resistance movements that cropped up simultaneously with Russian equipment and Russian soldiers contributing. But of course the US psyop’d 80% of the entire country to be in favor of EU membership. And the strong definitely not russian backed leader said no, I will carry on the true will of the Ukrainian people, which is to be subservient to Russia. And the people unjustly protested and got righteously shot for it. And then the totally not russian tanks rolled in.

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago
      1. There’s nothing wrong with insulting intelligence. As long as you don’t use it as a counter argument, it’s not even an ad hominem.
      2. Tankies are fucking idiots.
      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There’s nothing wrong with insulting intelligence.

        I was pointing out how it’s funny to make basic grammatical errors while doing so.

        Tankies are fucking idiots.

        Excellent contribution to the discourse.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          17 hours ago

          then please educate the masses.

          don’t be afraid to share knowledge. if they’re facts they are indisputable.

              • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                I’m curious as to what you think a reputable source is. One that agrees with you? I’m sure there are plenty of YouTube videos that do, are they disreputable and untrustworthy, simply because of the platform?

                • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 hours ago

                  a reputable source is one that provides the source of their information.

                  youtube content creators get their information from other Youtube content. It’s like a human centipede of misinformation.

                  in rare occasions youtube can be reputable if it’s content of the event as it happened, like when George Floyd was murdered and body cam footage was leaked online.

                  however, with better AI that can create archival footage like that, it’s harder to trust just any video.

                  point is, sources matter when you want to prove your dissertation.

            • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              took you long enough, and it was a shite of misinformation.

              how disappointing. expected, but disappointing.

              • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 hours ago

                It did not contain any misinformation, just basic facts about what was happening in Ukraine in 2014 - Euromaidan, separatist movements, far right consolidation, etc. Things reported on constantly by mainstream Western press for 8 years. There is at least one overzealous mod that is removing my comments, comments that contain no misinformation, and with no requests for clarification or any actual challenge to what I said.

                Feel free to ask me this question on a less censorious instance.