NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 11 days agoSurely we can learn from this?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up1609arrow-down1111
arrow-up1498arrow-down1imageSurely we can learn from this?lemmy.worldNoLifeGaming@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 11 days agomessage-square135fedilink
minus-squareKatana314@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·10 days agoThis statement implies popularity = good, universally. In the 1800s, slavery was popular. Hence, should a candidate have run on preserving slavery?
minus-squareworld_mods_are_scums@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-24 days agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareTinidril@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·edit-28 days agoNo it doesn’t. A candidate needs a lot of qualities to be “good”. One of those qualities is the ability to be popular on election day. An unpopular candidate isn’t a good candidate. A popular candidate might be.
This statement implies popularity = good, universally.
In the 1800s, slavery was popular. Hence, should a candidate have run on preserving slavery?
Removed by mod
No it doesn’t. A candidate needs a lot of qualities to be “good”. One of those qualities is the ability to be popular on election day. An unpopular candidate isn’t a good candidate. A popular candidate might be.